| Thread Closed |
HARRP: What are the facts? |
Share Thread | Thread Tools |
| Feb29-04, 05:55 PM | #1 |
|
|
HARRP: What are the facts?
This is a link to a fairly run-of-the-mill fear mongering type article about the dangers of HAARP. Pretty much the kind of stuff you ear on Coast to Coast.
Is anyone up on the real capabilities and limitations of this installation? HAARP Address:http://www.pacentro.com/HARRP/harrp.htm -Zooby |
| Feb29-04, 11:21 PM | #2 |
|
|
|
| Mar1-04, 05:31 AM | #3 |
|
|
So much for being able to controll the weather and ability to destroy the mentally capabilites of my enemies [!:)] (back to the drawing boards [!:)]). Besides the carefully crafted explanations regarding the capabilities of HAARP I'm fairly certain we can sleep sound tonight. Interesting information on that site though. |
| Mar1-04, 12:36 PM | #4 |
|
|
HARRP: What are the facts?
Ivan,
Regards |
| Mar1-04, 02:25 PM | #5 |
|
|
Thanks, Ivan.
I think it's interesting that the data is (or was supposed to be) available on the web in near real time. I wonder who can get access to it and how? The stated purpose of this research facility, though, raises more questions in my mind: "...and these observations can provide new information about the dynamics of plasmas and new insight into the processes of solar-terrestrial interactions." It isn't at all clear to me what is so important about this kind of information that it would merit such a large, expensive information gathering set up. |
| Mar1-04, 02:37 PM | #6 |
|
|
This would be the perfect toy for that. ;) |
| Mar1-04, 02:40 PM | #7 |
|
|
|
| Mar1-04, 07:26 PM | #8 |
|
|
Hey Zoob, dlgoff also gave the answer.
Thats alot of signal power going skipping about to and fro. Wonder about resonating patterning and control, I do. |
| Mar1-04, 09:44 PM | #9 |
|
|
Didn't read all the hype on the link in the original post, but they mainly seemed to be "harping" on the environmental impact. But my favorite conspiracy theory about HAARP has always been that the government hopes to find ways to excite the plasma in the ionosphere to a superheated state and possibly even direct it, so that a concentration of superheated plasma can be focussed over a single area. This would be the "Strategic Missile Defense Shield" that the so-called Starwars program was striving towards. If we detect what appears to be an ICBM launch by a hostile country, we just microwave the ionosphere above their launch sites, and the missiles get incinerated while trying to climb out of the atmosphere. Debris falls back down on the agressor. |
| Mar1-04, 10:50 PM | #10 |
|
|
|
| Mar5-04, 02:12 AM | #11 |
|
|
|
| Mar5-04, 11:00 AM | #12 |
|
|
Ivan,
Oh, I don't think it would cause any kind of problem. I was just thinking that the signal might be able to be received around the world. Do you know what frequency they are going to use? Regards |
| Mar8-04, 08:11 PM | #13 |
|
|
Reflecting in the ionosphere:
Several misinfos have been stated here. Radio wave are not 'reflected' off of the ionosphere. They are refracted, like light in a lens. Yeah, I know it is a nitpicky, but relevant. A radio wave for example at 1 MHZ may not be refracted at all by the ionosphere. It can be absorbed. Also, the higher the frequency, the more difficult it is to refract the signal back to the earth. It is less bent than a lower frequency. Also, the steeper the angle, (straight up being the steepest) the more difficult it is to refract back to the earth. There are several layers in the ionosphere and they all have their own characteristics on different frequencies. There have been books written on the subject. If you are really curious about it, some books can be obtained from the American Radio Relay League. It is an Amateur Radio organization. You may find more info here: http://www.remote.arrl.org/ |
| Mar8-04, 08:23 PM | #14 |
|
|
Thanks A.S.
I didn't find that nitpicky at all. It seems an important distinction to me. What constitutes the different layers of the ionosphere? This is something I wasn't aware of, that there were different layers within it. What are your thoughts about HAARP? Have you been following what info they're gathering with it? -Zooby |
| Mar8-04, 08:31 PM | #15 |
|
|
I haven't followed it very closely for a few years. I have a book on it that I picked up about 5 years ago. I believe it is filled with a huge amount of misinformation and gloom and doom predictions. I am sure that there are military motives behind it, but not everything is the huge conspiracy that people seem to believe.
|
| Mar8-04, 09:55 PM | #16 |
|
|
Well, to be fair we get both a reflected and a refracted waves at any boundary layer [differing indices of refraction] where the incident angle is less than then critical angle - beyond which we see total reflection. Also, in the strictest sense there is only absorption [conversion to heat], and absorption followed by emission such that the average yields the familiar laws for reflections and refraction.
Since we are being picky. [:D] |
| Mar8-04, 10:10 PM | #17 |
|
|
I don't find this picky.
|
| Thread Closed |
| Thread Tools | |
Similar Threads for: HARRP: What are the facts?
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | ||
| The Facts Everyone Should Know Test | General Discussion | 64 | ||
| Al Gore's own facts? | Current Events | 43 | ||
| Fun facts | General Discussion | 47 | ||
| Facts About India | General Discussion | 98 | ||
| Fun Facts | General Discussion | 45 | ||