God's Greatness: Logic vs. Faith?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Xclckwrkorrangex
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Logic
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the nature of God, specifically questioning the implications of God's existence without creation. Participants explore whether a God who merely exists, without having created anything, can still be considered great. The conversation touches on definitions of greatness, the essence of divinity, and the relationship between creation and the concept of God, while avoiding religious interpretations.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant proposes that if God never created anything and merely existed, it raises questions about God's greatness and whether such a being would still be considered a God.
  • Another participant argues that by definition, a God must be a creator, suggesting that without creation, the concept of God loses significance.
  • A different viewpoint suggests that there is no universally accepted definition of God, challenging the assumptions made about what constitutes divinity.
  • One participant introduces a pantheistic perspective, describing God as a universal gestalt rather than a creator or puppet master, which diverges from traditional definitions of God.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the definition of God and the necessity of creation for divinity. There is no consensus on whether a non-creating God can be considered great, indicating ongoing disagreement.

Contextual Notes

Participants rely on varying definitions of God and greatness, which are not universally agreed upon. The discussion highlights the ambiguity surrounding these concepts and the implications of different philosophical perspectives.

Xclckwrkorrangex
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
God is great...?

OK. So let us suppose that god never "created" anything, that "he" made merely existed. Would god still be considered great? Would he be a lesser god than one who might have created the universe? Or maybe for god to be GOD he HAD to create the universe. and doesn't this play into determinism? any thoughts...? and i don't want this to be answered religiously, I'm not looking for that. it's all about logic, right.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
TYPO FYI: i ment to say that ... let us suppose that god never "created" anything, that "he" HAD merely existed.
 
Microsoft is great. Is microsoft God?

Depends in the end on your definition of greatness.
 
Originally posted by Xclckwrkorrangex
TYPO FYI: i ment to say that ... let us suppose that god never "created" anything, that "he" HAD merely existed.

duh! how would he be a god? by definition, god is the big kahuna, creator and master blaster.

if he didn't create, what good is s/he? down with the lazy bugger!

peace,
 
Originally posted by olde drunk
duh! how would he be a god? by definition, god is the big kahuna, creator and master blaster.

if he didn't create, what good is s/he? down with the lazy bugger!

peace,

There is no definition of god. If you claim to have one, I would like to know what source it is based on.
 
god

i prefer to think of a universal gestalt that is greater than the sum of it's parts.

pantheism in general terms, if you would.

not a creator or puppeteer.

peace,
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 184 ·
7
Replies
184
Views
34K
Replies
89
Views
17K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
5K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
4K