Register to reply

Time as self-adjoint operator?

by arivero
Tags: operator, selfadjoint, time
Share this thread:
arivero
#1
Apr21-03, 03:39 PM
PF Gold
arivero's Avatar
P: 2,901
It has been asked if there exists an operator representing time. I remember some negative answers, but I do not remember the arguments.

In relativistic QM this relates to the non-existence of position operators; we are working with an (t,x,1,x2,x3) vector there. Also I believe to remember some provlem with velocity operators -its eigenvectors been only +c and -c, or so- but I am unsure about if both questions are related.

also, Energy-time indetermination is usedto estimate decay rates of particles. But there an operator is not invoked.
Phys.Org News Partner Physics news on Phys.org
Researchers demonstrate ultra low-field nuclear magnetic resonance using Earth's magnetic field
Bubbling down: Discovery suggests surprising uses for common bubbles
New non-metallic metamaterial enables team to 'compress' and contain light
damgo
#2
Apr21-03, 05:44 PM
P: n/a
See http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/uncertainty.html

There is a discussion of the time/energy UP, and a sketch of why there can be no true time operator.


Register to reply

Related Discussions
Adjoint of a linear operator Calculus & Beyond Homework 7
Self-adjoint operator General Math 3
Adjoint of an operator Linear & Abstract Algebra 8
Adjoint of an operator? Calculus & Beyond Homework 14
Adjoint of an operator Introductory Physics Homework 11