Register to reply

Linear Transformation from R^2 to R^3

by JG89
Tags: linear, transformation
Share this thread:
JG89
#1
Dec29-08, 10:06 AM
P: 726
Suppose a linear transformation [tex] T: R^2 \rightarrow R^3 [/tex] was defined by [tex] T(a_1,a_2) = (2a_1, a_2 + a_1, 2a_2)[/tex]. Now, for example, would I be allowed to evaluate [tex]T(3,8,0)[/tex] by rewriting (3,8,0) as (3,8)?
Phys.Org News Partner Science news on Phys.org
Bees able to spot which flowers offer best rewards before landing
Classic Lewis Carroll character inspires new ecological model
When cooperation counts: Researchers find sperm benefit from grouping together in mice
Defennder
#2
Dec29-08, 10:22 AM
HW Helper
P: 2,616
Quote Quote by JG89 View Post
Suppose a linear transformation [tex] T: R^2 \rightarrow R^3 [/tex] was defined by [tex] T(a_1,a_2) = (2a_1, a_2 + a_1, 2a_2)[/tex]. Now, for example, would I be allowed to evaluate [tex]T(3,8,0)[/tex] by rewriting (3,8,0) as (3,8)?
Not allowed. It's R^2 to begin with. In some cases, it might seem as though such practice were allowed, for example when you're working over the vector space of polynomial functions and have to add some polynomials which are not of the same degree, so the coefficients of the "missing" powers of x are treated as 0. However in such a case it's already implicitly understood that we usually omit writing 0x^3, 0x^4 for example even though they are there.

In your case, how ever, it is not clear cut as to why we should interpret (3,8,0) as (3,8). Why couldn't it be seen as (8,0) instead?
JG89
#3
Dec29-08, 10:42 AM
P: 726
It seems to me that (3,8,0) and (3,8) represent the same location, if you interpret the coordinates geometrically. My highschool math teacher said that this practice was allowed when evaluating cross products, so I thought it might have been okay here. For example, the cross product isn't defined in R^2. So if you wanted to find the cross product of (3,4) and (4,6), you would simply rewrite it as (3,4,0) and (4,6,0).

Defennder
#4
Dec29-08, 11:09 AM
HW Helper
P: 2,616
Linear Transformation from R^2 to R^3

Well it depends on the context. If you're an engineering student of course it makes sense to do so. But from a mathematical perspective it's not. It's only ok if it's understood to be intentionally omitted.

By the way you posted this in the Linear Algebra forums. Posting it elsewhere might net you a different answer. Don't try it though, since duplicate threads across different forums are frowned upon.
JG89
#5
Dec29-08, 03:04 PM
P: 726
Thanks for the help (I was only concerned with the mathematical viewpoint).


Register to reply

Related Discussions
Linear Algebra: Linear Transformation Problem Calculus & Beyond Homework 3
Linear algebra - inner product and linear transformation question Calculus & Beyond Homework 0
Linear Transformation - Linear Algebra Calculus & Beyond Homework 3
Linear Algebra: Linear Transformation and Linear Independence Calculus & Beyond Homework 8
LINEAR ALGEBRA - Describe the kernel of a linear transformation GEOMETRICALLY Calculus & Beyond Homework 6