# What technologies based on quantum mechanics affect our daily lives?

by Galteeth
Tags: affect, based, daily, lives, mechanics, quantum, technologies
 P: 320 I know MRIs. It seems that cell phone towers use superconductivity. What are some others?
 Sci Advisor P: 1,868 Define 'based on'? You can get extremely specific, as in devices that directly utilize a quantum-mechanical phenomenon in a central capacity, such as MRI. You can also be extremely broad, as in the fact that all the fundamental theories of chemical bonding and structure beyond the high school level are based directly on quantum mechanics. -It'd be impossible to say what the state of chemistry would be like in a world where Pauling's "The Nature of the Chemical Bond" and the theories presented would never have existed... As it turned out, the entire science of chemistry is just a specialized field of applied quantum mechanics. I don't know that cell phone transmitters use superconductors, though? Why would they need that?
 P: 416 Pretty much every piece of consumer electronics. Anything using permanent magnets, semiconductors or lasers (like CD/DVD players).
Mentor
P: 38,924

## What technologies based on quantum mechanics affect our daily lives?

 Quote by Galteeth I know MRIs. It seems that cell phone towers use superconductivity. What are some others?

There are lots of uses of QM in modern electronics, but your two lead-off examples make no sense to me. If you google electronics quantum tunneling, you will get a lot more real examples.
P: 320
 Quote by berkeman Your two examples are incorrect. Lordy. Please provide some links to what the heck you are talking about with them. There are lots of uses of QM in modern electronics, but your two lead-off examples make no sense to me. If you google electronics quantum tunneling, you will get a lot more real examples.
Perhaps I am wrong

http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/freea...rnumber=919285

 P: 480 Transistor which is the principal actor of ALL modern electronic devices. No exceptions. You probably own a a couple billion of those these days... Although the initial model proposed by Schokley did not include any quantum mechanical analysis, all the theory is based on some sort of a "band structure" , derived from quantum mechanics, and of course the effective mass theorem - another simplification from quantum mechanics.
Mentor
P: 38,924
 Quote by Galteeth
Weird. Cryogenic does not necessarily mean superconducting, first of all. But to be honest, those links a) look strange, and b) are beyond my experise to comment on. I'll report this thread to ask for help from the physicists here at the PF...
 P: 203 I'm guessing these are HTS (High Temp Superconducting) components used in mast head amplifiers. In designing the receiver subsystem at the cellular base station, you put some gain as close as possible to the antenna, by siting an amplifier at the top of the tower. This provides better overall signal to noise ratio since noise generated in the downstream components doesn't get amplified. The mast head amp uses a filter to provide some rejection of unwanted bands. It looks from the links as though HTS based filter components are being trialled in mast head amplifiers. As far as I know, they're not in widespread use yet....
P: 113
 Quote by berkeman Your two examples are incorrect. Lordy. Please provide some links to what the heck you are talking about with them. There are lots of uses of QM in modern electronics, but your two lead-off examples make no sense to me. If you google electronics quantum tunneling, you will get a lot more real examples.
Umm, MRIs use superconductors, which is a very quantum phase. That example holds. I don't know about antennae.
PF Gold
P: 2,176
 Quote by berkeman Weird. Cryogenic does not necessarily mean superconducting, first of all. But to be honest, those links a) look strange, and b) are beyond my experise to comment on. I'll report this thread to ask for help from the physicists here at the PF...
Superconducting filters have been used commercially in base stations for a few years, although they are not in widespread use yet (but as far as I understand we are still talking about thousands of installations in total). I'd say the main reason you don't hear much about them that the companies that sell them have learned the hard way NOT to use the fact that they use superconductors as their main "selling point". Note that I am not saying that they are hiding the fact that they use superconductors, but they've realized that performance is what counts.

The biggest seller of filters is STI

http://www.suptech.com/home.htm

There are also a few commercial installations of HTS components in the power grid (fault current limiters etc).
Mentor
P: 28,497
 Quote by Galteeth I know MRIs. It seems that cell phone towers use superconductivity. What are some others?
Your iPod, iPhones, computer chips, etc... etc.. Modern electronics was given birth by the invention of solid state transistors, and that's based on quantum mechanics. So look around you, and practically everything that you see is either a direct application of QM, or was manufactured using the capabilities made possible by QM.

Zz.
 P: 2,828 Physics Forums !
P: 1,868
 Quote by nnnm4 Umm, MRIs use superconductors, which is a very quantum phase. That example holds.
MRI is entirely quantum mechanical. It all works by flipping nuclear spins that've been Zeeman-split with a strong magnetic field, often using a sequence of pulses to manipulate the evolving mixed state.

The superconductors are somewhat incidental - they're just for creating the magnetic field. The first NMR experiments were done with ordinary magnets. The very first successful NMR experiment used a big magnet that'd previously been used to help discover the muon.
P: 590
 Quote by muppet Nuclear power would be a not-so-obvious application; nuclear decay is an intrinsically-quantum mechanical phenomenon, and you need to know about collision cross-sections etc. to control reaction rates. The next generation of nanotechnology, quantum computers, etc. might turn out to be quite fun too
 P: 463 “The budget request included $407.3 million in PE 61153N for defense research sciences programs. The committee recommends an increase of$1.5 million in PE 61153N for research on quantum computing and quantum mechanics that can support efforts to enhance Navy sensor and communications systems. The 2004 National Research Council study entitled Advanced Energetic Materials' characterized the U.S. effort on research and development of energetic materials as suboptimal,' but stated that the materials are a key component of the nation's defense strategies.' To help address this identified gap, the committee recommends an increase of $1.5 million in PE 61153N for basic research on energetic materials.” (Senate Report 110-335 - NATIONAL DEFENSE AUTHORIZATION ACT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2009) http://icreport.loc.gov/cgi-bin/cpqu...el=TOC_278710& I'm still thinking about the money that goes into 'defense research science programs' that are meant to protect me. P: 320  Quote by ViewsofMars “The budget request included$407.3 million in PE 61153N for defense research sciences programs. The committee recommends an increase of $1.5 million in PE 61153N for research on quantum computing and quantum mechanics that can support efforts to enhance Navy sensor and communications systems. The 2004 National Research Council study entitled Advanced Energetic Materials' characterized the U.S. effort on research and development of energetic materials as suboptimal,' but stated that the materials are a key component of the nation's defense strategies.' To help address this identified gap, the committee recommends an increase of$1.5 million in PE 61153N for basic research on energetic materials.” (Senate Report 110-335 - NATIONAL DEFENSE AUTHORIZATION ACT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2009) http://icreport.loc.gov/cgi-bin/cpqu...el=TOC_278710& I'm still thinking about the money that goes into 'defense research science programs' that are meant to protect me.