Is this idea of time travel consistent with relativity?

In summary: But again, this is only if you go through the wormhole after he's born, not before.That is only given relativity, if we throw quantum mechanics into the mix things get messy. Anyway, let us consider an alien civilization that is highly advanced and exists a few billion years ago that have all this technology. Say they leave one wormhole at their home and take the other one on a similar ride but 2 billion light years away and back. So they end up in our time and they decide to check out Earth. According to strict relativity, if we go through their wormhole we end up 4 billion years in the past and we can go to Earth and just go through
  • #1
superpaul3000
62
1
This is the explanation I give people when they ask about time travel. I am only an undergrad so I just want to ask the more experienced people here if this is correct. Thanks...


Time travel in the context of Einstein's relativity: So we all know that time travel into the future is easy (well given a very fast spaceship anyway). You don't even need a wormhole. The acceleration (not the velocity) causes time dilation so you can accelerate to near the speed of light and travel 10 light years away and come back. The end result is you end up 20 years in Earth's future even though it only took seconds or minutes for you. So given a wormhole, you could keep one end on Earth and take the other end with you for that same ride. Now you have gates A and B next to each other. There is no cosmic censorship keeping this from happening since it does not violate causality. If I go through wormhole B, I find myself 20 years in the past but there is only the one gate A there and I am at the same time I started. So you can't keep going back in time to kill your grandfather or something. You can keep going through wormhole A though and traveling into the future at 20 year increments.

That is only given relativity, if we throw quantum mechanics into the mix things get messy. Anyway, let us consider an alien civilization that is highly advanced and exists a few billion years ago that have all this technology. Say they leave one wormhole at their home and take the other one on a similar ride but 2 billion light years away and back. So they end up in our time and they decide to check out Earth. If we go through their wormhole we end up 4 billion years in the past and we can go to Earth and just go through our entire history right? (Using the easy form of future time travel in increments) Well according to strict relativity yes, but in order to maintain causality the time traveling versions of ourselves would have existed in our past and we should see evidence of this in the fossil record right now. But if we consider quantum mechanics, then we (the time travelers) won’t see our history as it really happened, we will see a completely different series of events since each event is just a random outcome of some number of wave function collapses (however you define that collapse, Copenhagen or MWI). So after 4 billion years you might not even end up with an Earth with life. The only way we can see what happened in our past is to go through wormholes that were made at different times in our past. But as soon as you go through it that universe starts differentiating so you only have a small amount of time to check out your past (this depends on the event you are looking at, the age of dinosaurs is a long age but the time to assassinate Hitler is much shorter). Again none of this violates causality. Even if you travel to see your grandfather before you were born and kill him. This is because as soon as you go through the wormhole that person is not exactly the same person as your grandfather, even though he looks and sounds the same.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Hello, can anyone verify this?
 
  • #3
What? Verify what happens when you go through a wormhole? No. :p
 
  • #4
superpaul3000 said:
Time travel in the context of Einstein's relativity: So we all know that time travel into the future is easy (well given a very fast spaceship anyway). You don't even need a wormhole. The acceleration (not the velocity) causes time dilation
Time dilation in special relativity is a function of velocity, not acceleration. It is true that if two observers cross paths twice at different points in spacetime, and one has moved inertially between the two meetings while the other accelerated at some point during the journey, than the one who accelerated will always have aged less.
superpaul3000 said:
So given a wormhole, you could keep one end on Earth and take the other end with you for that same ride. Now you have gates A and B next to each other. There is no cosmic censorship keeping this from happening since it does not violate causality.
Cosmic censorship deals with naked singularities, maybe you're thinking of the chronology protection conjecture?
superpaul3000 said:
If I go through wormhole B, I find myself 20 years in the past but there is only the one gate A there and I am at the same time I started. So you can't keep going back in time to kill your grandfather or something.
If your grandfather didn't have your parents until after the date wormholes were taken on the relativistic trip and brought back together with a time difference between them, then you certainly could meet your grandfather before your parents were born. Even if this type of time travel were possible, it doesn't necessarily mean you could succeed in killing him, perhaps the Novikov self-consistency principle would apply and it would be impossible to change the past. But grandfathers aside, this type of time travel is certainly the kind that would "violate causality" in the sense meant by physicists, where it is no longer true that we can assign a temporal order to events in such a way that causes always precede effects...for example, you could wait until the results of a lottery drawing were announced, then travel back one day before that and tell your younger self to buy a ticket with those numbers...even if there is no paradox created here, the cause of your younger self buying the ticket with those numbers lies in his own future, so this is a causality violation. And this form of time travel would definitely contradict the "chronology protection conjecture" (the most common idea about how chronology protection would be enforced in the case of wormholes involves virtual particles which build up in a feedback loop as you try to move the two ends close enough to allow for backwards time travel, either destroying the mouths before they can be moved close enough or causing a repulsive effect...see here and here for a discussion, and for a more detailed discussion read the last chapter of Kip Thorne's book https://www.amazon.com/dp/0393312763/?tag=pfamazon01-20).
superpaul3000 said:
That is only given relativity, if we throw quantum mechanics into the mix things get messy. Anyway, let us consider an alien civilization that is highly advanced and exists a few billion years ago that have all this technology. Say they leave one wormhole at their home and take the other one on a similar ride but 2 billion light years away and back. So they end up in our time and they decide to check out Earth. If we go through their wormhole we end up 4 billion years in the past and we can go to Earth and just go through our entire history right? (Using the easy form of future time travel in increments) Well according to strict relativity yes, but in order to maintain causality the time traveling versions of ourselves would have existed in our past and we should see evidence of this in the fossil record right now.
Again, you misunderstand what "causality" means, time travelers from Earth today going back to Earth 4 billion years ago would automatically be a causality violation, even if something like the Novikov self-consistency principle held sway and this trip did not lead to any "changes" to history.
superpaul3000 said:
But if we consider quantum mechanics, then we (the time travelers) won’t see our history as it really happened, we will see a completely different series of events since each event is just a random outcome of some number of wave function collapses (however you define that collapse, Copenhagen or MWI).
Since we don't have a theory that combines general relativity with quantum mechanics it's not at all clear what such a theory would say about the GR solutions that seem to allow backwards time travel, like spacetimes involving wormholes. Probably the most popular hypothesis is that quantum gravity will rule out these loopholes and chronology protection will hold true. But if backwards time travel is possible in quantum gravity, there's no reason to think it would necessarily lead to the possibility of changing the past, it might be that even though there are multiple possible histories as in the MWI, the Novikov principle applies to each individual history so time travel does not allow anyone to visit a different history than their own.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

1. What is relativity and how does it relate to time travel?

Relativity is a scientific theory proposed by Albert Einstein that explains the relationship between space and time. It states that the laws of physics are the same for all observers, regardless of their relative motion. This theory is important in understanding time travel because it explains how time is affected by gravity and velocity.

2. Can time travel be consistent with the principles of relativity?

Yes, it is possible for time travel to be consistent with the principles of relativity. According to the theory, time can be slowed down or sped up based on the gravitational pull or velocity of an object. This means that if the conditions are right, time could theoretically be manipulated to allow for time travel.

3. What are the different types of time travel theories that are consistent with relativity?

There are two main types of time travel theories that are consistent with relativity: the "block universe" theory and the "many worlds" theory. The "block universe" theory suggests that past, present, and future all exist simultaneously and time travel is simply the act of moving through this 4-dimensional block. The "many worlds" theory proposes that every decision we make creates a new parallel universe, allowing for the possibility of traveling to different points in time.

4. Are there any paradoxes that arise from time travel being consistent with relativity?

Yes, there are several paradoxes that can arise from time travel being consistent with relativity. One of the most well-known is the grandfather paradox, which questions what would happen if someone were to go back in time and prevent their own birth. This would create a paradox because if they were never born, they wouldn't have been able to go back in time in the first place.

5. Are there any real-life examples of time travel being consistent with relativity?

While time travel has not been proven to be possible, there are some real-life examples that support the idea of time travel being consistent with relativity. For example, astronauts who spend extended periods of time in space have been found to age slightly slower than those on Earth, due to their increased velocity. This is known as time dilation and is a key concept in relativity and time travel theories.

Similar threads

  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
21
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
3
Views
787
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
11
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
2
Replies
65
Views
4K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
23
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
415
  • Special and General Relativity
3
Replies
98
Views
2K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
4
Views
549
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
12
Views
837
Back
Top