Thread Closed

equivalence relation

 
Share Thread Thread Tools
Nov12-09, 06:06 AM   #1
 

equivalence relation


Hey

I can't see how x~x+1 is an equivalence relation on the real numbers?

I don't understand what the relation is. Can anyone help?
PhysOrg.com
PhysOrg
mathematics news on PhysOrg.com

>> Mathematicians analyze social divisions using cell phone data
>> Can math models of gaming strategies be used to detect terrorism networks?
>> Mathematician proves there are infinitely many pairs of prime numbers less than 70 million units apart
Nov12-09, 08:00 AM   #2
 
Perhaps you want the equivalence relation generated by this...

x ~ x+1 ~ x+2 ~ ...

Or perhaps not. Without context, we can only guess.
Nov12-09, 08:30 AM   #3
 
A relation is a rule that relates elements of one set (in this case the real numbers) to elements of another set (in this case, ALSO the real numbers). An equivalence relation is one from a set to itself that has three properties:

The relation must be reflexive (x must be related to x)
The relation must be symmetric (if x is related to y, then y is related to x), and
The relation must be transitive (if x is related to y, and y is related to z, then x is related to z)

The relation you have, where x is related to x+1 is not an equivalence relation.
1 is not related to 1, since 1 is only related to 2 (not reflexive).
1 is related to 2, but 2 is not related to 1 (it's related to 3) (not symmetric).
1 is related to 2 and 2 is related to 3, but 1 is not related to 3 (not transitive).

It actually fails every single one of the properties.
Nov12-09, 08:43 AM   #4
 
Recognitions:
Homework Helper Homework Help
Science Advisor Science Advisor

equivalence relation


Quote by g_edgar View Post
Without context, we can only guess.
My guess: it's the real numbers mod 1.
Nov13-09, 07:07 AM   #5
 
Oops yeah should have been a lot more specific. Context:

Talking about the quotient space of r by the equivalence relation x ~ x+1.

Relating each point to the point +1 ?

1~2 and 2~3 but 1~3 is false...

This is an equivalence relation since states so in literature. So it is clear I don't understand how equivalence relations are working here. Any help? Thanks
Nov13-09, 08:37 AM   #6
 
Ah, then CRGreathouse was right; the quotient space on that relation is constructing the real numbers modulo 1. When it's flat out saying that that's an equivalence relation, then it's saying that it's reflexive, transitive and symmetric. Essentially, this is saying that the part of any real number before the decimal point doesn't matter, so the equivalence classes (all the things that are equivalent under this relation) are things like Z+{0.5} = {..., -3.5, -2.5, -1.5, -0.5, 0.5, 1.5, 2.5, 3.5, ...}, because all those things are related to each other.
Nov13-09, 08:57 AM   #7
 
ok so R / ~ = [0,1)?
Thread Closed

Tags
equivalence relation
Thread Tools


Similar Threads for: equivalence relation
Thread Forum Replies
equivalence relation Calculus & Beyond Homework 7
Equivalence Relation Calculus & Beyond Homework 4
Equivalence relation General Math 3
Prove that a relation is an equivalence relation Precalculus Mathematics Homework 4
Equivalence relation Precalculus Mathematics Homework 4