Register to reply 
Does trivial cotangent bundle implies trivial tangent bundle? 
Share this thread: 
#1
Mar210, 02:49 PM

Sci Advisor
HW Helper
PF Gold
P: 4,772

If the tangent bundle is trivial, then the cotangent bundle is trivial. To see this, consider (X_i) a global frame for TM. Then define a global frame (\alpha^i) for T*M by setting [itex]\alpha^i(X_j)=\delta_{ij}[/itex] and extend by linearity.
Does trivial cotangent bundle implies trivial tangent bundle? A similar argument based on global frames does not seem to work in this direction: given a global frame (\alpha^i) for T*M, how do you define a global frame for TM? It does not makse sense to say "Let X_i be the vector field such that [itex]\alpha^i(X_j)=\delta_{ij}[/itex]" because such a vector field might not exist. And if locally, [itex]\alpha^i=\sum_j\alpha^i_jdx^j[/itex], then defining a (global) vector field by setting [itex]X_i:=\sum_j\alpha^i_j\partial_j[/itex] is inconsistent because the coefficients [itex]\alpha^i_j[/itex] do no transform correctly. 


#2
Mar210, 03:43 PM

Sci Advisor
HW Helper
PF Gold
P: 4,772

I may have spoken too fast. It appears now that it does make sense to say "Let X_i be the vector field such that [itex]\alpha^i(X_j)=\delta_{ij}[/itex]".



#3
Mar210, 03:45 PM

Sci Advisor
P: 1,588

Yeah, if a matrix is invertible, then so is its inverse. :D
The subtlety only happens when things are infinitedimensional. 


#4
Mar210, 04:26 PM

Sci Advisor
HW Helper
PF Gold
P: 4,772

Does trivial cotangent bundle implies trivial tangent bundle?
What happens in that case?



#5
Mar210, 05:23 PM

Sci Advisor
P: 1,588

The dual space V* of an infinitedimensional vector space V can be strictly larger than V, and so they can't be isomorphic. For example, on a space of functions, the dual space includes distributions, which are not in the original space.
Also, on an infinitedimensional vector space, a linear operator might have a right inverse, but no left inverse (or vice versa). For example, on an L^2 function space in an interval [a,b], define the derivative operator D as [tex]Df = \frac{df}{dx}[/tex] and an integral operator J as [tex]Jf = \int_a^x f(x') \; dx'[/tex] Then D has a right inverse, given by J: [tex]DJf = f[/tex] but no left inverse, because [tex]JDf \neq f[/tex] for all possible f (specifically, all the constant functions are mapped to 0 by D, and J maps 0 to 0). 


#6
Mar1110, 11:26 AM

P: 491

In general, you can just use a metric to set up an isomorphism between them, i.e. any nondegenerate pairing < , > on a finite dimensional vector space gives an isomorphism with its dual. The problem of infinite dimensionality of course arises since we're using the equivalence of nondegeneracy and isomorphism.



Register to reply 
Related Discussions  
Is an associated bundle isomorphic to the principal bundle?  Differential Geometry  0  
Tangent bundle on the sphere  Differential Geometry  8  
Simple question about definition of tangent bundle  Differential Geometry  4  
Tangent bundle of a differentiable manifold M even if M isn't orientable  Calculus & Beyond Homework  1 