What does it mean by a Riemannian metric on a vector bundle?


by petergreat
Tags: riemannian metric, vector bundle
petergreat
petergreat is offline
#1
Mar18-11, 05:32 PM
P: 270
It's really a question about convention. Does such a metric have to be linear on each fiber?
Phys.Org News Partner Science news on Phys.org
SensaBubble: It's a bubble, but not as we know it (w/ video)
The hemihelix: Scientists discover a new shape using rubber bands (w/ video)
Microbes provide insights into evolution of human language
lavinia
lavinia is offline
#2
Mar18-11, 06:18 PM
Sci Advisor
P: 1,716
Quote Quote by petergreat View Post
It's really a question about convention. Does such a metric have to be linear on each fiber?
symmetric bilinear form on each fiber
petergreat
petergreat is offline
#3
Mar18-11, 06:33 PM
P: 270
Quote Quote by lavinia View Post
symmetric bilinear form on each fiber
Does it have to preserve the natural Euclidean metric up to a constant factor in each fiber (which is a vector space)?

petergreat
petergreat is offline
#4
Mar18-11, 06:38 PM
P: 270

What does it mean by a Riemannian metric on a vector bundle?


In other words, are we allowed to "curve" the base space only or the entire space?
lavinia
lavinia is offline
#5
Mar18-11, 06:41 PM
Sci Advisor
P: 1,716
Quote Quote by petergreat View Post
Does it have to preserve the natural Euclidean metric up to a constant factor in each fiber (which is a vector space)?
not sure what you mean but each fiber is a vector space with a metric defined on it. Different fibers have there own separate metric and there is generally no way to compare them among different fibers.

There is generally no natural Euclidean metric on a fiber.

If you have a submanifold of another manifold then its tangent and normal bundles inherit a metric from the metric on the tangent space of the ambient manifold.
petergreat
petergreat is offline
#6
Mar18-11, 06:44 PM
P: 270
Quote Quote by lavinia View Post
not sure what you mean but each fiber is a vector space with a metric defined on it. Different fibers have there own separate metric and there is generally no way to compare them among different fibers.

There is generally no natural Euclidean metric on a fiber.

If you have a submanifold of another manifold then its tangent and normal bundles inherit a metric from the ambient manifold.
I'm talking about a vector bundle, so each fiber has a natural metric up to constant factor.
lavinia
lavinia is offline
#7
Mar18-11, 06:51 PM
Sci Advisor
P: 1,716
Quote Quote by petergreat View Post
I'm talking about a vector bundle, so each fiber has a natural metric up to constant factor.
no. There is no natural metric. Why do you think that? Can you give me a proof?
petergreat
petergreat is offline
#8
Mar18-11, 06:57 PM
P: 270
Quote Quote by lavinia View Post
no. There is no natural metric. Why do you think that? Can you give me a proof?
Oops... You're right. But still, does it have to be a constant 2-tensor on each fiber?
lavinia
lavinia is offline
#9
Mar18-11, 07:00 PM
Sci Advisor
P: 1,716
Quote Quote by petergreat View Post
Oops... You're right. But still, does it have to be a constant 2-tensor on each fiber?
On each fiber ,it is just a metric on the fiber viewed as a vector space.

Different fibers are different vector spaces and generally have different metrics - which means there is no natural way to compare these vector spaces or their metrics.
petergreat
petergreat is offline
#10
Mar18-11, 07:02 PM
P: 270
Thanks! That's clear now.


Register to reply

Related Discussions
GR with Riemannian (++++) metric? Special & General Relativity 4
Information content of the metric, Riemannian and Ricci tensors Special & General Relativity 6
Complete riemannian metric Differential Geometry 1
Lie group, Riemannian metric, and connection Differential Geometry 2