Register to reply

The birther movement: racist? total crap?

by KingNothing
Tags: birther, crap, movement, racist
Share this thread:
KingNothing
#1
Apr26-11, 09:02 PM
P: 949
There exists a group of people who seek to cast doubt on the legitimacy of Barack Obama's citizenship and his birth certificate. I have searched very diligently and still have not found a single quantum of credibility to this theory.

Sure, any document can, in theory, be faked. People can be manipulated and evidence can be tampered with. The same could be said about the documents of every other president, congressperson, or senator. Certainly when the quality of the allegedly fake document exceeds the limitations of your ability to detect it's falsehood, one must concede.

Though it is undoubtedly just a political maneuver, I cannot help thinking that it is also an appeal to racism. I am rarely one to blow the racism whistle, but come on: we all know that if Barack was white and had a more traditional American name, none of this would have come up.
Phys.Org News Partner Science news on Phys.org
Fungus deadly to AIDS patients found to grow on trees
Canola genome sequence reveals evolutionary 'love triangle'
Scientists uncover clues to role of magnetism in iron-based superconductors
Insanity
#2
Apr26-11, 09:13 PM
P: 60
A Certification of Live Birth from Hawaii was made available many years ago, which is a short form birth certificate, and is evidence of birth in any court.

Barack Obama was born in Hawaii.
Office_Shredder
#3
Apr26-11, 09:30 PM
Emeritus
Sci Advisor
PF Gold
P: 4,500
Quote Quote by Insanity View Post
A Certification of Live Birth from Hawaii was made available many years ago, which is a short form birth certificate, and is evidence of birth in any court.

Barack Obama was born in Hawaii.
Ah yes, this completely clears up the OP's questions.

I think it's one of those things where people say they believe it, but they really just like the idea that it could be believed by someone, which will help them gain political power/support

russ_watters
#4
Apr26-11, 09:41 PM
Mentor
P: 22,287
The birther movement: racist? total crap?

Quote Quote by KingNothing View Post
I am rarely one to blow the racism whistle, but come on: we all know that if Barack was white and had a more traditional American name, none of this would have come up.
Really? So you don't remember almost the exact same issue being raised about McCain?
Quote Quote by MSNBC
Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., and his advisers are doing their best to brush aside questions — raised in the liberal blogosphere — about whether he is qualified under the Constitution to be president. But many legal scholars and government lawyers say it's a serious question with no clear answer.
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/23415028/ns/nightly_news/

That's MSNBC!, the liberal answer to Fox, forwarding the anti-McCain crackpottery as if it could possibly have had some merit. I suppose they could just be a bunch of black racists, but I'm thinking no...just run-of-the-mill crackpots.
Pengwuino
#5
Apr26-11, 09:43 PM
PF Gold
Pengwuino's Avatar
P: 7,120
Yah this is the same ol political BS. People hear stuff like that and think "oh yah that sounds good, i believe it!". Hell, I personally thought the guy was born on a military base. Sounded good, why not, go for it.

There's nothing racist about it, some people just want SOMETHING to pick up on to claim he's illegitimate. Same stuff that happened during Bush's tenure.
Al68
#6
Apr26-11, 09:53 PM
P: 801
Quote Quote by KingNothing View Post
There exists a group of people who seek to cast doubt on the legitimacy of Barack Obama's citizenship and his birth certificate. I have searched very diligently and still have not found a single quantum of credibility to this theory.

Sure, any document can, in theory, be faked. People can be manipulated and evidence can be tampered with. The same could be said about the documents of every other president, congressperson, or senator. Certainly when the quality of the allegedly fake document exceeds the limitations of your ability to detect it's falsehood, one must concede.

Though it is undoubtedly just a political maneuver, I cannot help thinking that it is also an appeal to racism. I am rarely one to blow the racism whistle, but come on: we all know that if Barack was white and had a more traditional American name, none of this would have come up.
Yeah, the fact that "birthers" are mostly the same people who have always opposed Democrats of all races is a total coincidence. Must be because he's black.

As far as his original long form birth certificate, I always thought he probably had one, but the recent shenanigans of Hawaii officials, including the Governor, changing their stories and left wing pundits trying to say "there is no issue" does have me wondering. Especially the claim that it exists but the President isn't allowed to have a copy for himself, even though I've seen no link to any Hawaii law that says that, instead of the opposite.

I'm not claiming there isn't such a law specific to original birth records, just that I haven't seen it quoted or linked anywhere. Perhaps someone could provide a link?

My guess is that the President has it in his possession, but it's in his best political interest not to release it now. Just a wild guess.
KingNothing
#7
Apr26-11, 09:53 PM
P: 949
Quote Quote by russ_watters View Post
Really? So you don't remember almost the exact same issue being raised about McCain?
Nope...I don't. I honestly make zero effort to listen to MSNBC or Fox, and I hadn't heard that.
lisab
#8
Apr26-11, 09:54 PM
Mentor
lisab's Avatar
P: 2,985
Quote Quote by russ_watters View Post
Really? So you don't remember the exact same issue being raised about McCain?
It didn't have the same level of hostility, IMO.

Besides, it's widely accepted that being born on an overseas military base is the same as being born in the US. The thousands of US citizens born on foreign bases have *exactly* the same rights as everyone else - no one would ever think to deny them their rights.

I think the issue around McCain's birth was largely a media-manufactured "story du jour" - they come and go all through election season. This one didn't stick - it was a non-issue from the get-go.
russ_watters
#9
Apr26-11, 09:58 PM
Mentor
P: 22,287
Quote Quote by KingNothing View Post
Nope...I don't. I honestly make zero effort to listen to MSNBC or Fox, and I hadn't heard that.
It's not like MSNBC was the only place you could have seen it. How 'bout USA Today?
http://www.usatoday.com/news/politic...ral-born_N.htm

New York Times?
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/02/28/us.../28mccain.html

Washington Post?
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv...nkie070998.htm

CNN?
http://articles.cnn.com/2011-04-20/o...?_s=PM:OPINION

This got quite a bit of airtime during the campaign.
russ_watters
#10
Apr26-11, 10:00 PM
Mentor
P: 22,287
Quote Quote by lisab View Post
It didn't have the same level of hostility, IMO..... [snip] I think the issue around McCain's birth was largely a media-manufactured "story du jour" - they come and go all through election season. This one didn't stick - it was a non-issue from the get-go.
Well sure: he didn't win, so it died!

Anyway, I'm not going to start linking crackpot liberal sites to prove hostility (nor do I think it should be necessary). My point is simply that it had quite a bit of traction and I don't think it is reasonable to use the fact that it died to show it was less serious than Obama's.
Besides, it's widely accepted that being born on an overseas military base is the same as being born in the US. The thousands of US citizens born on foreign bases have *exactly* the same rights as everyone else - no one would ever think to deny them their rights.
Not according to MSNBC....

Just to be clear, I'm not saying it had any legitimacy, I'm just saying it happened and it was picked-up and debated in mainstream media. A lot.
Pengwuino
#11
Apr26-11, 10:01 PM
PF Gold
Pengwuino's Avatar
P: 7,120
OH it was McCain who was born on a military base? God I'm out of it
Al68
#12
Apr26-11, 10:01 PM
P: 801
Quote Quote by lisab View Post
It didn't have the same level of hostility, IMO.
That's because no one objected to discussing the issue. No one was screaming incessantly "there's nothing to see here, no issue at all, the debate is over, etc."

McCain provided all info and documents, and the issue was only whether being born on U.S. territory qualified as being a "natural born" citizen.
The thousands of US citizens born on foreign bases have *exactly* the same rights as everyone else - no one would ever think to deny them their rights.
That's not really relevant. Arnold Schwarzenegger, and any naturalized citizen, has the rights of a citizen, too. But there are qualifications to be eligible for President in addition to citizenship, like being born in the U.S. Not meeting the requirements for the office isn't a violation of rights.
jtbell
#13
Apr26-11, 10:04 PM
Mentor
jtbell's Avatar
P: 11,748
Quote Quote by russ_watters View Post
Really? So you don't remember almost the exact same issue being raised about McCain?
But did 40 percent of Democrats believe that McCain was ineligible to be President?
Office_Shredder
#14
Apr26-11, 10:09 PM
Emeritus
Sci Advisor
PF Gold
P: 4,500
Quote Quote by Al68 View Post
McCain provided all info and documents, and the issue was only whether being born on U.S. territory qualified as being born in the U.S.
I don't even know if he provided any documents. Certainly few people believed he wasn't born on US territory and the issue of whether that qualifies as being a natural born citizen was never settled beyond people deciding it was a boring one and not paying attention to it/bringing it up in the media
lisab
#15
Apr26-11, 10:11 PM
Mentor
lisab's Avatar
P: 2,985
Quote Quote by Al68 View Post
That's because no one objected to discussing the issue. No one was screaming incessantly "there's nothing to see here, no issue at all, the debate is over, etc."

McCain provided all info and documents, and the issue was only whether being born on U.S. territory qualified as being born in the U.S.
They "screamed incessantly" that there was "nothing to see", "no issue", and "the debate is over"....because there was, in fact, nothing to see, no issue, and the debate was over.

http://www.cnn.com/2011/POLITICS/04/....html?iref=NS1

Look, there is *no* comparison between the McCain birth "controversy" and the crazy Obama-is-a-Kenyan birthers. Not even close!
russ_watters
#16
Apr26-11, 10:19 PM
Mentor
P: 22,287
Quote Quote by jtbell View Post
But did 40 percent of Democrats believe that McCain was ineligible to be President?
1. So you're saying that 40% of Republicans don't believe Obama was eligible? Do you have a reliable source for that? All I can find is links to a single poll that even typically irresponsibly liberal news outlets like Huffington Post couple with a disclaimer about reliability: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/0..._n_248470.html

2. The McCain conspiracy theory didn't have time to fester like Obama's did. Again, he lost.
3. We're getting pretty far from a racist motivation here....
Al68
#17
Apr26-11, 10:20 PM
P: 801
Quote Quote by lisab View Post
They "screamed incessantly" that there was "nothing to see", "no issue", and "the debate is over"....because there was, in fact, nothing to see, no issue, and the debate was over.
That's a very odd thing to do, which was my point. Are you aware that one can get a "certification of live birth" even if there was never an original birth certificate?

I think Obama was most likely born in Hawaii, but claiming "the debate is over" despite unresolved issues, unanswered questions, and ever-changing stories by officials is suspicious at best.

Plus, Democrats typically use terms like "crazy" and "crackpot" for other people whenever they are trying to obfuscate the truth themselves. That's what has me wondering about this issue.
Al68
#18
Apr26-11, 10:23 PM
P: 801
Quote Quote by Office_Shredder View Post
I don't even know if he provided any documents. Certainly few people believed he wasn't born on US territory and the issue of whether that qualifies as being a natural born citizen was never settled beyond people deciding it was a boring one and not paying attention to it/bringing it up in the media
Yep, that was the conclusion of the Senate hearing on it: it's too boring to pay attention to.


Register to reply

Related Discussions
In binary can we have a value with deci centi mili or more lower valued prefix? Computers 14
The Grassroots movement , and the Tea Party Current Events 1056
Help needed with the effect of no time / time freeze on bullet movement Introductory Physics Homework 13
Does quantum mechanical definition of momentum require movement ? Quantum Physics 21
Yup another oh crap I don't have the book issue. EM Fields, Wangsness Advanced Physics Homework 4