What is the Correct Calculation for the Pressure at the Center of a Planet?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Bill Wells
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Center Planet Pressure
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the pressure at the center of a planet, specifically Earth. Participants explore various equations and assumptions related to constant and variable density, as well as the implications of gravitational forces on pressure calculations. The scope includes theoretical approaches and mathematical reasoning.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants reference a pressure value at the center of Earth around 3 x 10^11 Pa, while others calculate a lower value using a constant density assumption.
  • One participant suggests integrating the gravitational constant given the mass of the Earth to refine calculations.
  • Another participant proposes an equation for pressure based on mass, volume, and radius, yielding a pressure of 3.47 x 10^11 Pa.
  • A different equation for uniform density central pressure is presented, showing similarities to previously mentioned formulas.
  • Some participants discuss the need to account for varying density and gravitational effects, noting that pressure calculations may differ based on assumptions about mass distribution.
  • One participant emphasizes the importance of integrating gravitational acceleration over depth when calculating pressure in a planet's interior.
  • Concerns are raised about the applicability of certain formulas to celestial bodies with non-uniform density distributions.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the appropriate methods for calculating central pressure, with no consensus reached on a single correct approach. Multiple competing models and equations are presented, reflecting ongoing debate and exploration of the topic.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include assumptions about constant density versus variable density, the impact of gravitational forces, and the influence of external layers like the atmosphere on pressure calculations. These factors contribute to the uncertainty in the derived pressure values.

Bill Wells
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Posted this on the homework page, got no replyies so thought I'd try here. It's no longer "homework", already sent in my work!

I have seen several references which give the pressure at the center of the Earth at about 3 x 10^11 Pa. (I've seen 3.0 - 3.6). An earlier post on this forum gives the equation for the pressure at the center of a planet as
2*(pi*G/3)*(R^2)*(rho)^2. When I crunch the numbers, I get 1.73 x 10^11, which is about half what most references give. I'm using rho = 5515 kg/m^3.
Where am I going wrong.
The above assumes constant density (rho). If you like the above problem, is there an equation which would give central pressure if the density increases with depth?

Thanks Much
Bill
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Integrate the gravitational constant given the mass of the earth.
 
Bill Wells said:
I have seen several references which give the pressure at the center of the Earth at about 3 x 10^11 Pa. (I've seen 3.0 - 3.6). An earlier post on this forum gives the equation for the pressure at the center of a planet as
2*(pi*G/3)*(R^2)*(rho)^2. When I crunch the numbers, I get 1.73 x 10^11, which is about half what most references give. I'm using rho = 5515 kg/m^3.
Where am I going wrong.
The above assumes constant density (rho).

You're surprised that assuming a constant density gives you an answer that's off by a factor of 2? There is no simple formula to calculate the central pressure of the earth, but you can probably get it to a good approximation with an [tex]n \simeq 0.5[/tex] polytrope. If you don't know what polytropes are, I suggest looking it up.
 
Bill, here is an equation which will work for almost all celestial bodies:

Pressure = (Mass^2 * G) / (Volume * Radius)

Earth Mass is: 5.98E10^24 [kg]
Earth Radius is: 6.37E10^6 [m]
Newton's Constant G is: 6.67E10^-11 [m^3/kg*s^2]

V = (4 * pi * R^3) / 3 = 1.08E10^21 [m^3]

M^2 * G = (5.98E10^24 [kg])^2 * 6.67E10^-11 [m^3/kg*s^2) = 2.39E10^39 [kg*m^3/s^2]
V * R = 1.08E10^21 [m^3] * 6.37E10^6 [m] = 6.90E10^27 [m^4]

Earth Pressure = 2.39E10^39 [kg*m^3/s^2] / 6.90E10^27 [m^4] = 3.47E10^11 [kg/m*s^2]
which is: 347 giga Pascals of pressure at the center of the earth!
 
Hi xArcturus

Where did you get that one from? It's quite a good approximation, though more by chance than design. In terms of mass and radius here's the uniform density central pressure equation...

P= (3/8π)*(GM²/R⁴)

...so you can see the likeness.

xArcturus said:
Bill, here is an equation which will work for almost all celestial bodies:

Pressure = (Mass^2 * G) / (Volume * Radius)

Earth Mass is: 5.98E10^24 [kg]
Earth Radius is: 6.37E10^6 [m]
Newton's Constant G is: 6.67E10^-11 [m^3/kg*s^2]

V = (4 * pi * R^3) / 3 = 1.08E10^21 [m^3]

M^2 * G = (5.98E10^24 [kg])^2 * 6.67E10^-11 [m^3/kg*s^2) = 2.39E10^39 [kg*m^3/s^2]
V * R = 1.08E10^21 [m^3] * 6.37E10^6 [m] = 6.90E10^27 [m^4]

Earth Pressure = 2.39E10^39 [kg*m^3/s^2] / 6.90E10^27 [m^4] = 3.47E10^11 [kg/m*s^2]
which is: 347 giga Pascals of pressure at the center of the earth!
 
Since this forum has been so helpful to me, I'd like to give back! Here's my first post. Thanks for all the help, everyone.

@ qraal

Pascal's Principle states that P = ρgz where ρ is density, g is gravitational acceleration and z is depth.

If ρ=mass/volume, g=(G*mass)/(radius^2) then
P = [(G*mass^2)*z]/(volume*radius^2)

Then our equation transforms:
P = [(Gm^2)z]/(vr^2)
= (Gm^2r)/(vr^2)
= (G*mass^2)/(volume*radius)

Using the constants...
G = 6.674(10^-11) m^3*kg^-1*s^-2
m(earth) = 5.974(10^24) kg
v(earth) = 1.083(10^21) m^3
r(earth) = 6.371(10^6) m
z = depth = r, if we're thinking about the center.

P = 347(10^9) Pa at the center.

And there it is :)
 
travboat said:
Since this forum has been so helpful to me, I'd like to give back! Here's my first post. Thanks for all the help, everyone.

@ qraal

Pascal's Principle states that P = ρgz where ρ is density, g is gravitational acceleration and z is depth.

If ρ=mass/volume, g=(G*mass)/(radius^2) then
P = [(G*mass^2)*z]/(volume*radius^2)

Then our equation transforms:
P = [(Gm^2)z]/(vr^2)
= (Gm^2r)/(vr^2)
= (G*mass^2)/(volume*radius)

Using the constants...
G = 6.674(10^-11) m^3*kg^-1*s^-2
m(earth) = 5.974(10^24) kg
v(earth) = 1.083(10^21) m^3
r(earth) = 6.371(10^6) m
z = depth = r, if we're thinking about the center.

P = 347(10^9) Pa at the center.

And there it is :)

Yes - but what you forget is integrating the g over z.

In the interior of planet, only part of the interior is gravitating - so unless the mass is concentrated enough in center, g decreases.

If the density is uniform through interior then g is simply proportional to r (distance from centre). Then the central pressure P=ρgR/2. Which is never exactly true, but there are 2 components of mass concentration. Compositional segregation and pressure compression. If both are negligible, e. g. in Moon, then the pressure should be close to what was stated above.

Also note that g itself is proportional to ρr: V=4/3πrˇ3; m=Vρ=4/3πρrˇ3; g=Gm/rˇ2=(4/3πG)ρr.
It follows that the central pressure is proportional only to the square of surface gravitational acceleration and independent of radius and density (because these cancel out). Earth and Saturn have the same core pressure - provided that the distribution of internal density were the same.
 
xArcturus said:
Bill, here is an equation which will work for almost all celestial bodies:

Pressure = (Mass^2 * G) / (Volume * Radius)
This has to be an effective formula which assumes something about the composition of the object. Consider earth: If you use the radius of the solid masses, you get a good approximation. But Earth also has another low-density layer outside: The atmosphere. It increases the radius (~1/60) and the volume (~1/20), but its mass and influence on pressure is negligible.
While the formula might be good with constant density (I think it is the same as the formula for that case), it cannot describe objects where the density varies a lot as function of radius.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K