Why is the Center of the Earth so Hot?

In summary: Energy obtained by a ‘growing’ inner core is limited by the known small size of the inner core. Energy available from this model has a maximum near the minimum 1011 W needed for a geodynamo. Precessional energy is obtained from Earth rotational kinetic energy and is limited by known estimates of secular deceleration by lunar and solar torques. Estimates of days/year from 850 Ma ago and 360 Ma ago of 435 (10,11) and 397 (12) , respectively, all compute to ~ 3.5x1012 W average continuous loss of rotational kinetic energy. Although this energy also powers other phenomena...
  • #36
DH;

There is more than 1 type of internal energy: Chemical, Nuclear, Latent and Thermal.
Most people understand thermal energy to be heat energy.
So, it's best to specify which type is being discussed to avoid confusion.
Anyhow, this is somewhat OT to the original posting topic.


Up to 90% of the heat in the core of the Earth is from radioactive decay.
Between 5 to 10% is from friction caused by gravity.
Between 5 to 10% is residual left over from the original formation of earth.
And a small amount is latent heat released when molten materials turn into solids.

Another reason why the center of the Earth is so hot, is that it takes a long time to conduct heat thru the crust simply because it is so thick.
 
Earth sciences news on Phys.org
  • #37
D H said:
Objects above absolute zero contain internal energy. Calling this internal energy "internal heat energy" is a misnomer. This phraseology recalls the long-falsified phlogiston and caloric theories of heat. Objects do not contain "heat".

I don't think of heat as phlogiston nor caloric. But I do think of objects containing heat, which is an energy, and a function of temperature for a given substance of a given density and phase.

What is wrong with this thinking?
 
  • #38
One of you fellows got the answer correct. Friction. It is well known that the Earth's axis has a wobble which shifts the entire mass of the Earth each day. In effect the wobble causes a shaking of the Earth's mass which keeps the crust flexing resulting in Earth quakes and volcanoes and the generation of heat. Ok?

One can speculate on changing of the poles, ancient shifting of Mars and Venus, pressure of all that weight, and one will grow old speculating, die and pass such speculation on the the next generation who will grow old and .....
 
  • #39
oliaison said:
One of you fellows got the answer correct. Friction. It is well known that the Earth's axis has a wobble which shifts the entire mass of the Earth each day. In effect the wobble causes a shaking of the Earth's mass which keeps the crust flexing resulting in Earth quakes and volcanoes and the generation of heat. Ok?

Nope. Not OK until you back up your claim, as someone already asked you to do when you posted the same thing earlier in this thread. Without evidence, you seem to be merely guessing. Gravitational heating sounds more plausible to me.
 
  • #40
oliaison said:
One of you fellows got the answer correct. Friction. It is well known that the Earth's axis has a wobble which shifts the entire mass of the Earth each day. In effect the wobble causes a shaking of the Earth's mass which keeps the crust flexing resulting in Earth quakes and volcanoes and the generation of heat. Ok?

One can speculate on changing of the poles, ancient shifting of Mars and Venus, pressure of all that weight, and one will grow old speculating, die and pass such speculation on the the next generation who will grow old and .....

You've made 2 posts in 2 years, both identical and neither with evidence to back up your claims.
 
  • #41
If we go with the theory that the Earth is cooling, then why couldn't the book Journey to the Centre of the Earth be real? Most people will say it's impossible, but since the discovery of other galaxies, who is to say that anything is impossible?
 
  • #42
a2d4r6o8 said:
If we go with the theory that the Earth is cooling, then why couldn't the book Journey to the Centre of the Earth be real? Most people will say it's impossible, but since the discovery of other galaxies, who is to say that anything is impossible?

Getting to the center of the Earth is not theoretically impossible, it is simply impossible to do given todays technology. The vast majority of the details in the book are simply fiction for a good story and have no relevance to real life.
 
  • #43
Thank you, but then again, with todays technology shouldn't it be easier to get to the centre of the earth. If we could we could actually have proof of why the centre of the Earth is so hot and who's to say there isn't a granite shaft that may block out the central heating of the world, making it possible to enter the centre of the earth?
 
  • #44
a2d4r6o8 said:
Thank you, but then again, with todays technology shouldn't it be easier to get to the centre of the earth. If we could we could actually have proof of why the centre of the Earth is so hot and who's to say there isn't a granite shaft that may block out the central heating of the world, making it possible to enter the centre of the earth?

Granite is formed from magma, which is molten rock. The shaft would melt long before it got close to the center of the Earth. Not only that, there is immense pressure building up as you get further underground, so the shaft would never be able to hold up.
 
  • #45
a2d4r6o8 said:
Thank you, but then again, with todays technology shouldn't it be easier to get to the centre of the earth. If we could we could actually have proof of why the centre of the Earth is so hot and who's to say there isn't a granite shaft that may block out the central heating of the world, making it possible to enter the centre of the earth?
This is absolute nonsense.
 

Similar threads

  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • Earth Sciences
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • Classical Physics
Replies
5
Views
761
  • General Engineering
2
Replies
67
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
7K
  • Science Fiction and Fantasy Media
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
8K
  • Electrical Engineering
2
Replies
48
Views
8K
  • Materials and Chemical Engineering
Replies
12
Views
2K
Back
Top