| Thread Closed |
[spr] Re: dimensions |
Share Thread |
| Nov5-04, 08:20 AM | #1 |
|
|
[spr] Re: dimensions
<jabberwocky><div class="vbmenu_control"><a href="jabberwocky:;" onClick="newWindow=window.open('','usenetCode','toolbar=no,location=no, scrollbars=yes,resizable=yes,status=no,width=650,height=400'); newWindow.document.write('<HTML><HEAD><TITLE>Usenet ASCII</TITLE></HEAD><BODY topmargin=0 leftmargin=0 BGCOLOR=#F1F1F1><table border=0 width=625><td bgcolor=midnightblue><font color=#F1F1F1>This Usenet message\'s original ASCII form: </font></td></tr><tr><td width=449><br><br><font face=courier><UL><PRE>\nThomas Cuny <tec@highstream.net> wrote\n\n> Are dimensions fundamental?\n> Dimensions don\'t seem to exist when the universe is in the big bang\n> state,the big crunch state, or in black holes.\n> Perhaps dimensions don\'t really exist.\n\nDimension, like many other, is not an absolute concept, so whether it =\ndoes exist or not, depends on the perspective taken. Basically, given a =\nset, you introduce a dimension if you can factorize the labels assigned =\nto its elements. The deeper such factorization, the higher dimension can =\nbe ascribed to the set. If the procedure is based on some particular =\ndistance relation between the elements it is not guaranteed to succeed. =\nThis is well familiar to anybody having to do with a fractal, where it =\nis impossible to factorize the labels, and thence the \'dimension\' gauged =\nby embedding the set in a bigger one (for which a factorization is =\nknown), is \'found\', or rather defined non-integer.\n\nregards\npg\n\n\n----------------------------------------------------------------------\nStartuj z INTERIA.PL!!! >>> http://link.interia.pl/f1837\n</UL></PRE></font></td></tr></table></BODY><HTML>');"> <IMG SRC=/images/buttons/ip.gif BORDER=0 ALIGN=CENTER ALT="View this Usenet post in original ASCII form"> View this Usenet post in original ASCII form </a></div><P></jabberwocky>Thomas Cuny <tec@highstream.net> wrote
> Are dimensions fundamental? > Dimensions don't seem to exist when the universe is in the big bang > state,the big crunch state, or in black holes. > Perhaps dimensions don't really exist. Dimension, like many other, is not an absolute concept, so whether [itex]it =[/itex] does exist or not, depends on the perspective taken. Basically, given a = set, you introduce a dimension if you can factorize the labels assigned = to its elements. The deeper such factorization, the higher dimension can = be ascribed to the set. If the procedure is based on some particular = distance relation between the elements it is not guaranteed to succeed. = This is well familiar to anybody having to do with a fractal, where [itex]it =[/itex] is impossible to factorize the labels, and thence the 'dimension' gauged = by embedding the set in a bigger one (for which a factorization is = known), is 'found', or rather defined non-integer. regards pg ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Startuj z INTERIA.PL!!! >>> http://link.interia.pl/f1837 |
| Thread Closed |
Similar discussions for: [spr] Re: dimensions
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | ||
| how many dimensions are there, really? | Beyond the Standard Model | 28 | ||
| Dimensions | Classical Physics | 9 | ||
| dimensions | Beyond the Standard Model | 0 | ||
| Dimensions. | General Physics | 40 | ||
| 9 Space Dimensions 2 Time Dimensions | General Physics | 7 | ||
