New Reply

A Conceptual Question on de Rham cohomology.

 
Share Thread Thread Tools
Jan1-12, 07:09 PM   #1
 

A Conceptual Question on de Rham cohomology.


Hi everybody,

Currently, I am studying cohomology on my own. I have a question:

Why H rD(M) = 0, when r > n

n is the dimension of manifold M
My book says it is obvious, but to me it is not obvious.

I wish someone could explain this question to me.
PhysOrg.com
PhysOrg
science news on PhysOrg.com

>> Galaxies fed by funnels of fuel
>> The better to see you with: Scientists build record-setting metamaterial flat lens
>> Google eyes emerging markets networks
Jan1-12, 07:12 PM   #2
 
Recognitions:
Gold Membership Gold Member
Science Advisor Science Advisor
Retired Staff Staff Emeritus
Well, how is the group defined?
Jan1-12, 07:22 PM   #3
 
Quote by Hurkyl View Post
Well, how is the group defined?
The group is defined as
HrD (M) = Ker(dr)/Im(dr-1)
Jan1-12, 07:51 PM   #4
 
Recognitions:
Gold Membership Gold Member
Science Advisor Science Advisor
Retired Staff Staff Emeritus

A Conceptual Question on de Rham cohomology.


Quote by T_Mart View Post
The group is defined as
HrD (M) = Ker(dr)/Im(dr-1)
And what groups is dr a homomorphism from and to?
Jan2-12, 10:53 PM   #5
 
Recognitions:
Homework Helper Homework Help
Science Advisor Science Advisor
it follows from properties of the wedge product, as is being suggested.
Jan12-12, 03:05 PM   #6
 
Recognitions:
Science Advisor Science Advisor
How do you define n-cocycles and n-coboundaries?
Jan12-12, 06:30 PM   #7
 
Recognitions:
Homework Helper Homework Help
Science Advisor Science Advisor
there aren't even any ≠0 cochains in dimensions above the dimension of the manifold.

the reason is essentially that an nbyn determinant is always zero if the matrix has rank < n.
Jan12-12, 10:36 PM   #8
 
Recognitions:
Science Advisor Science Advisor
Yes, that was the point I was trying to make. Look up the definition of n-cocycles and n-coboundaries to see what the cohomology groups are . Or, if you have the right conditions for Poincare Duality, see why you cannot have (n+k)-cycles; k>0, in an n-manifold.
New Reply

Tags
de rham
Thread Tools


Similar Threads for: A Conceptual Question on de Rham cohomology.
Thread Forum Replies
Confusion on de Rham cohomology of manifolds Differential Geometry 9
de Rham's first theorem Differential Geometry 2
group cohomology Linear & Abstract Algebra 0
de Rham theorem.... Differential Geometry 1
de Rham cohomology Differential Geometry 10