Question about nucleosynthesis

In summary, when stars form and join the main-sequence, they burn hydrogen to make helium. As they evolve, they can also produce heavier elements like carbon, neon, silicon, and up to iron through various fusion reactions. However, if the star is massive enough, it can end its life in a supernova and produce even heavier elements through the rapid process or r-process. The s-process, which occurs in red giant stars, can also produce elements up to bismuth. While Fe is often referred to as the heaviest element formed in stars, this is due to its stability, but supernovae can produce elements up to and past uranium.
  • #1
manenbu
103
0
I've been reading lately about the origin of the elements and their production in stars and I have a few questions. Let's start by the simple stuff, and correct me if I'm wrong.

When stars form and join the main-sequence they burn hydrogen to make helium.
At a certain stage when the hydrogen in the core is exhausted, depends on their mass, they turn into red giants and begin burning helium and make the heavier elements by carbon burning, neon burning, silicon burning. Elements up to iron can be produced like that.
If the star is massive enough, it will end its life in a supernova and form heavier (actinids, etc) elements in the r-process.
So far so good? I hope so.

I've also read that certain stars can make elements up to Bi by the s-process. Is this occurring in a supernova? If not, then why is it widely cited that Fe is the heaviest element to form in stars when in fact heavier up-tp-Bi elements can form?

Thanks for clearing up my confusion.
 
Space news on Phys.org
  • #2
You are right about the s-process producing the Bi element. As for the reason concerning the statements you mention having read, I don't know.

The S-process

The net result of this cycle therefore is that 4 neutrons are converted into one alpha particle, two electrons, two anti-electron neutrinos and gamma radiation:
The process thus terminates in bismuth, the heaviest "stable" element. (Bismuth is actually slightly radioactive, but with a half-life so long—a billion times the present age of the universe—that it is effectively stable over the lifetime of any existing star.)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/S-process


Bismuth-209

In the red giant stars of the asymptotic giant branch, the s-process (slow process) is ongoing to produce bismuth-209 by neutron capture as the heaviest element to be formed. All elements heavier than it [Bismuth-209] are formed in the r-process, or rapid process, which occurs during the first fifteen minutes of supernovae.[4]
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bismuth-209


Brackets mine.
 
Last edited:
  • #3
Fe is the limit of elements produced during the lifetime of a star undergoing a series of fusion reactions, H -> He -> C, O -> ... -> Fe.

Heavier elements are produced in Supernova explosions. It doesn't stop at Bi. Everything up to and maybe past U are also formed. Supernovae impart so much energy to their constituents that high energy fusion reactions occur.
 
  • #4
Saying that the heaviest element that a star can produce is Fe is simply referring to the generation of elements by the fusion reactions in the core. (Which in itself is just simplifying things as isotopes of iron, nickel, zinc, and cobalt are all produced at the same time) The S-Process occurs under a different set of circumstances and depends on the initial content of iron in the star when it is initially formed, as iron is the starting material for the S-process.
 
  • #5
All of the previous comments seem totally right on; but one thing I think is important, is the stability argument. My understanding is that, the primary determining factor is stability. Fe is (approximately) the most stable element (binding energy per nucleon). All elements below Fe tend to undergo fusion to grow towards Fe; elements higher than Fe tend to undergo fission to decay towards Fe.

Nucleosynthesis is a thermodynamic (i.e. stochastic) process, and thus all sorts of crazy stuff is going on. The more stable something is, the more it will be produced and survive. The 's' in 's-process' is for slow (neutron capture), which means that unstable elements/isotopes will have time to decay before capturing further neutrons. S-Process elements do exist, but in low quantities relative to iron.

The 'r' in 'r-process', on the other hand, is for rapid (neutron capture) which can cram neutrons onto nuclei fast enough to reach higher A/Z stable states. This only happens during supernovae (as said above), but is much more effective at producing heavier elements, especially nickel (which ends up being the primary source of optical emission in SN light curves).

In summary: you've got the right picture. Fe is referred to as the highest element produced in stars because its the highest element produced in significant quantities, but up to ~Bi occurs. Supernovae can produce elements up to and past U; but still Fe, and near-Fe elements are the most stable, and thus preferred.
 

1. What is nucleosynthesis?

Nucleosynthesis is the process by which elements are formed in the universe. This includes the formation of hydrogen and helium in the early stages of the universe, and the creation of heavier elements through nuclear fusion in the cores of stars.

2. What are the different types of nucleosynthesis?

There are several types of nucleosynthesis, including primordial nucleosynthesis, stellar nucleosynthesis, explosive nucleosynthesis in supernovae, and cosmic ray nucleosynthesis. Each of these processes plays a role in the production of different elements in the universe.

3. How does nucleosynthesis occur?

Nucleosynthesis occurs through nuclear reactions, specifically fusion, in which lighter elements are combined to form heavier elements. These reactions require extreme temperatures and pressures, such as those found in the cores of stars.

4. What role does nucleosynthesis play in the evolution of the universe?

Nucleosynthesis is fundamental to the evolution of the universe as it is responsible for the creation of all the elements we see around us. Without nucleosynthesis, the universe would consist of only hydrogen and helium, and life as we know it would not be possible.

5. How do scientists study nucleosynthesis?

Scientists study nucleosynthesis through a combination of theoretical models and observations. They use telescopes and other instruments to observe the elements present in stars and other celestial bodies, and then compare these observations with predictions from theoretical models to better understand the process of nucleosynthesis.

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
941
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
10
Views
477
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
11
Views
551
  • Cosmology
Replies
1
Views
812
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
5
Views
1K
Back
Top