Register to reply 
AxKochen paper 
Share this thread: 
#1
Mar412, 07:04 AM

P: 355

Has anyone read this paper?
http://arxiv.org/abs/quantph/9905077 I am just curious what people think about it. 


#2
Mar512, 11:11 AM

Sci Advisor
PF Gold
P: 5,388

Here is the abstract:
"The Copenhagen Interpretation describes individual systems, using the same Hilbert space formalism as does the statistical ensemble interpretation (SQM). This leads to the wellknown paradoxes surrounding the Measurement Problem. We extend this common mathematical structure to encompass certain natural bundles with connections over the Hilbert sphere S. This permits a consistent extension of the statistical interpretation to interacting individual systems, thereby resolving these paradoxes. Suppose V is a physical system in interaction with another system W. The state vector of V+W has a set of polar decompositions with a vector q of complex coefficients. These are parameterized by the right toroid T of amplitudes q, and comprise a singular toroidal bundle over S, which comprises the enlarged state space of V+W. We prove that each T has a unique natural convex partition yielding the correct SQM probabilities. In the extended theory V and W synchronously assume pure spectral states according to which member of the partition contains q. The apparent indeterminism of SQM is thus attributable to the effectively random distribution of initial phases. " This has a date on the paper of 2008, which is confusing because the submission history does not list a revision after 1999. I see that occasionally, not sure what it signifies exactly. 


#3
Mar612, 02:20 AM

Sci Advisor
P: 4,612




Register to reply 
Related Discussions  
KochenSpecker As Simple Corollary Of Gleasons Theroem  Quantum Physics  4  
The GRW Flash Theory and the ConwayKochen ‘Free Will’ Theorem  Quantum Physics  1  
KochenSpecker for two particles  Quantum Physics  0  
Conway and Kochen FW theorem  Quantum Physics  4  
The first scientific proof of free will (based on Conway & Kochen)  General Discussion  22 