| Thread Closed |
Why is ET such a magnet for loonatics? |
Share Thread |
| Mar8-12, 01:25 PM | #52 |
|
|
Why is ET such a magnet for loonatics?It took more than 1/3 of the age of the universe just to get to our level of sophistication. And there's no reason to believe that evolution happens at outrageously faster rates elsewhere, even with a sampling of 10^23. So there are definitely some rate-limiting factors on how god-like any alien can get. |
| Mar8-12, 01:44 PM | #53 |
|
|
The point we are at now is an example. Will technology soon make forms of immortality possible? It already allows us to fly, clone creatures, harness electricity, travel to the moon etc. Certainly, ancient man might have considered this god like. How about the possibility that genetic engineering, nano technology, etc, make it possible for us to artificially evolve ourselves? But I don't think we will ever be able to make ecosystems out of clay in seven days. |
| Mar8-12, 06:59 PM | #54 |
|
|
wouldn't there be alot of compounds of the same as humans if there were? aliens are just living things. If so they exist.
|
| Mar8-12, 07:06 PM | #55 |
|
|
Advanced as they are, with 10^23 possible chances at godliness, none of them brought the universe into existence with a flick of their mind. |
| Mar9-12, 07:28 AM | #56 |
|
|
Nor am I saying a ET of God. I am simply saying that in an infinite universe (I believe it's infinite) if you allow the possibility of ET and also overcome anthropic bias, then you have to also allow the possibility of such an ET existing, that might be so vastly different to us, in scale, phase, intelligence, etc, as to be considered God, or at least 'god like' by our standards. |
| Mar9-12, 07:47 AM | #57 |
|
|
Assume a race of ET's developed similar to us, but were, say, 100,000 years ahead (still, not even a blink in the eye of Buddha) - quite possible according to your above numbers. Also assume that they had managed not to blow themselves up, and had continued a steady (if not exponential) rate of technological progress. Where would you say they'd be in the scale of 'godliness' according to our perceptions ? I must continue to state here, that I don't believe this to be the case - I don't believe in ET at all, and am at most, ambivalent about the big G question. I am merely following your logic, and still believe if one is possible, so is the other. |
| Mar9-12, 07:53 AM | #58 |
|
|
(please see above posts) |
| Mar9-12, 08:18 AM | #59 |
|
|
Yes, I think it is safe to say that, considering the breadth of the universe, and accepting the possibility of ET, one must allow for the possibility of god-like creatures.
But note: It is also safe to say that, considering the breadth of the universe, and not believing in ET, one must still allow for the possibility of god-like creatures. i.e. Alt, you must allow for the possibility too, despite your beliefs to the contrary. Because, frankly your argument that there are no ETs (and therefore no possibility that any might be god-like) is indefensible. It's the diff between what you think is probably true, and what you must still allow the possibility for. |
| Mar9-12, 12:47 PM | #60 |
|
|
It would be wrong to claim with certainty that there is no life elsewhere in the universe considering how vast the universe is. There is a good possibility that life exists elsewhere, but it likely is very different from anything we have here on earth. It is entirely feasible that there exist advanced intelligent lifeforms out there, but they would still be constrained by the same physical laws that apply to us. People often forget this crucial limitation. Technological advancement can only get you so far so to speak...
|
| Mar9-12, 12:59 PM | #61 |
|
|
|
| Mar10-12, 12:58 AM | #62 |
|
|
(DaveC, thank you for your as always, enlightening and considered reply, #59. Hope to post a brief response soon) |
| Mar10-12, 07:21 AM | #63 |
|
|
|
| Mar10-12, 01:48 PM | #64 |
|
|
|
| Mar10-12, 02:26 PM | #65 |
|
|
|
| Mar29-12, 03:06 PM | #66 |
|
|
to the op..there are loons everywhere into everything |
| Thread Closed |
Similar discussions for: Why is ET such a magnet for loonatics?
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | ||
| Why is the permament magnet not completely attracted to the superconducting magnet? | General Physics | 2 | ||
| Why does elecricity kill? What causes a magnet to be a magnet? | Classical Physics | 9 | ||
| ur in a room with a magnet and an iron bar how do u know which one is the magnet | Introductory Physics Homework | 23 | ||
| Would running an electrical current through a magnet destroy the magnet? | General Physics | 4 | ||
| what make the magnet to be magnet with magnetic field? | General Physics | 23 | ||