|Apr18-12, 11:58 AM||#1|
Covalent bonding in transition metals. Can someone help?
According to my book, for 1st row Transition Metals, the acidity of a aquo-complex is greater for those elements at the right of the periodic table. They justify this by saying that to the RHS, the cation is more polarizing and weakens the O-H bond to a greater extent.
I do get this, but for me, this is contradictory to the fact that towards the RHS, the d-orbital is more contracted and less available for bonding. THEREFORE, the degree of bonding between the metal and O is lower, and it does not "break" the O-H bond as much.
chemistry news on PhysOrg.com
>> Detecting mirror molecules: New technique reliably tells left-handed from right-handed variant of a compound
>> Chemists devise inexpensive, accurate way to detect prostate cancer
>> Overcoming resistance to anti-cancer drugs by targeting cell 'powerhouses'
|Similar Threads for: Covalent bonding in transition metals. Can someone help?|
|Is covalent bonding only between non metals?||Biology, Chemistry & Other Homework||1|
|Covalent Bonding and Bonding Order||Chemistry||2|
|Covalent Bonding||Biology, Chemistry & Other Homework||3|