|Apr27-12, 04:29 PM||#1|
CMB Peak Fregenucy (Planck's law vs. Wein's law)
"The CMBR has a thermal black body spectrum at a temperature of 2.725 K, which peaks at the microwave range frequency of 160.2 GHz, corresponding to a 1.873 mm wavelength. This holds if measured per unit frequency, as in Planck's law. If measured instead per unit wavelength, using Wien's law, the peak is at 1.06 mm corresponding to a frequency of 283 GHz."
How come there is a difference in the peak frequencies, between using Planck's law vs. Wein's law?
|Apr27-12, 04:43 PM||#2|
In short, the difference is because you have to transform the differential element [itex]d\lambda[/itex] to [itex] d \nu [/itex] (or vice-versa) rather than just substituting in the corresponding expression from the dispersion relation.
|Similar Threads for: CMB Peak Fregenucy (Planck's law vs. Wein's law)|
|Wein Bridge Oscillators, how do they work?||Engineering, Comp Sci, & Technology Homework||0|
|Wein Bridge Oscillator||Engineering, Comp Sci, & Technology Homework||0|
|wein bridge oscillator.||Electrical Engineering||2|
|the party's over: peak oil has distracted us from peak helium!||General Discussion||11|
|Question on the derivation of Wein's displacement law||Astrophysics||0|