| New Reply |
Is the product of P actually wug and what about |
Share Thread | Thread Tools |
| May4-12, 04:57 PM | #1 |
|
|
Is the product of P actually wug and what about
P = mv so do this mean that the product of v is μg and the product of m is weight?
So it could be written P = wμg How is this formula derived Vf = √(Vi^2 + (2ad)) |
| PhysOrg.com |
physics news on PhysOrg.com >> Promising doped zirconia >> New X-ray method shows how frog embryos could help thwart disease >> Bringing life into focus |
| May4-12, 05:41 PM | #2 |
|
|
Hi Probie1!
![]() …what is the context (and what do you mean by "product")? |
| May4-12, 06:45 PM | #3 |
|
|
Does product not mean... umm the make up... it is part of or makes up?
I guess the context of all this is I am trying to undertand how formula's come about. P = mv so do this mean that the product of v is μg and the product of m is weight? So it could be written P = wμg This is another question. How is this formula derived Vf = √(Vi^2 + (2ad)) |
| May4-12, 07:03 PM | #4 |
|
|
Is the product of P actually wug and what about
Mathematically "product" means the result of multiplying numbers. It simply doesn't make sense to talk about the "product" of a single number as in "product of v is μg" or "the product of m is weight". Perhaps you mean it the other way- weight is the product of mg. That is "mass times the acceleration due to gravity of an object is the force on that object due to gravity"- by definition its "weight". I'm not sure what you could mean by "v is the product μg", if that is what you intend, because you have not told us what μ is and it is not a standard symbol. Sometimes μ is used for the "coefficient of drag" but that doesn't make sense here. Assuming g is the acceleration due to gravity and v is velocity, their standard meanings, since v would have units of "meters per second" and g "meters per seconds squared", μ would have to have units of "seconds"- it would have to be a "time". Is that correct?
|
| May4-12, 07:22 PM | #5 |
|
Mentor
|
|
| May5-12, 01:54 AM | #6 |
|
|
Hi Probie1!
![]() (try using the X2 and X2 buttons just above the Reply box )So we start with a = constant. Then, integrating, v = at + vi. And integrating again, d = 1/2 at2 + vit. Can you finish the proof? What did you mean by P m v m and g ?
|
| May5-12, 04:53 PM | #7 |
|
|
D= at + vi2 Alright... stop laughing. m=mass v=velocity g = gravity μ = friction w= weight I thought that if P=mv then v = a = μg but then I remembered where I left my brain because a = change in velocity over a change in time. So it can't possibly be the way I was thinking. So just forget I was so stupid to write that down. |
| New Reply |
| Thread Tools | |
Similar Threads for: Is the product of P actually wug and what about
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | ||
| Show the product of convergent sequences converge to the product of their limits | Calculus & Beyond Homework | 2 | ||
| Deriving cross product and dot product, stuck at beginning. | Calculus & Beyond Homework | 8 | ||
| Angle between 2 vectors using 1) Dot product and 2) cross product gives diff. answer? | Calculus & Beyond Homework | 8 | ||
| Why some functional integral(in QTF theo)of a product equal product of two the integr | Quantum Physics | 2 | ||
| cross product and dot product of forces expressed as complex numbers | Introductory Physics Homework | 4 | ||