Optical Molasses

by Niles
Tags: molasses, optical
Niles is offline
May6-12, 04:54 PM
P: 1,863

When introducing optical molasses, the polarization of the counter-propagating beams are never taken into account. Is it really correct that the polarization of the beams are irrelevant, when trying to reach the Doppler-limited temperature?

Phys.Org News Partner Physics news on Phys.org
Chameleon crystals could enable active camouflage (w/ video)
Atomic switcheroo explains origins of thin-film solar cell mystery
X-ray laser experiment explores how specially shocked material gets stronger
KBT is offline
May7-12, 08:07 PM
P: 3
Yes. The Doppler limit can be derived by considering the interplay between the optical molasses cooling force and the heating effect of random spontaneous emission. The spontaneous emission can be modeled as a random walk in momentum space with steps of [itex]\hbar k[/itex]. Nowhere in this derivation is the polarization of the beams relevant.

However, the counter-propagating beams do have a polarization, and this polarization can be used in conjunction with the atoms' magnetic structure to realize sub-Doppler temperatures. In this case, the polarization of the beams is highly relevant.
Niles is offline
May8-12, 03:39 PM
P: 1,863
I see, thanks.


Register to reply

Related Discussions
Molasses Fermentation Chemistry 7
Outward force of molasses on a cylinder Introductory Physics Homework 3
Cylindrical Drum of Molasses Introductory Physics Homework 2
reason for optical activity(of optical isomers) Chemistry 1