| New Reply |
Disappearing Field |
Share Thread | Thread Tools |
| May4-12, 01:19 PM | #1 |
|
|
Disappearing Field
So say we have a uniform field of magnitude X. Let's say the force that the field exerts is dependent on a particle's mass, M.
Now say we move the particle D distance against the force of the field, XM. Our potential energy will be equal to XMD, because we exerted XM force over distance D, hence work was converted into potential energy. Now we suddenly turn off this field, like one would turn off an electric field by discharging a capacitor. What happens to the potential energy? |
| PhysOrg.com |
physics news on PhysOrg.com >> Promising doped zirconia >> New X-ray method shows how frog embryos could help thwart disease >> Bringing life into focus |
| May5-12, 01:50 AM | #2 |
|
|
The field you removed carried the energy that creates that potential. So when you remove the source of the field the potential energy will disappear because the energy that caused it was removed from the system. By whatever magic you accomplished that since Gauss wouldn't be happy you removed a source from the system...suddenly ; )
As an example think about the classic problem of what would happen if you could remove the sun from the solar system. Well, after the last gravitational waves from the sun passed the Earth it would no longer have any potential energy from the sun and it would fly off in a straight line at constant velocity having only kinetic energy. Hope that helps. |
| May5-12, 03:46 AM | #3 |
|
|
hi lluke9!
![]() ![]() you discharge a capacitor by connecting the two plates so that electrons flow from one towards the other that does not happen instantly, it happens very fast, but one electron at a time, and each electron goes through a voltage difference … also, if there's eg a positive charge on a spring between the plates, which was being pulled towards the electrons, each electron also has to overcome the attraction from that charge as it moves away! (so you don't get quite as much energy from discharging the capacitor as you thought you would) the potential energy "disappearing" between the plates equals the work done by moving the electrons
|
| May7-12, 06:41 PM | #4 |
|
|
Disappearing Field
Thanks for help-- you've restored my faith in classical mechanics xD
But another question... what if I moved that positive charge away from the capacitor so that it is no longer in the field? And I moved it in from the top, so it gets potential energy? Okay, I'm pretty sure I'm doing something wrong, now. |
| May7-12, 06:48 PM | #5 |
|
|
then you're moving it through a decreasing electric field |
| May9-12, 03:13 PM | #6 |
|
|
But I've done no work, right?
|
| May9-12, 03:37 PM | #7 |
|
|
hmm … yes, you're right, there's no work!
![]() i don't know the answer in that case |
| May9-12, 04:47 PM | #8 |
|
|
|
| New Reply |
| Thread Tools | |
Similar Threads for: Disappearing Field
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | ||
| Disappearing posts? | Forum Feedback & Announcements | 10 | ||
| Q: Disappearing photons? | General Physics | 1 | ||
| Q: Disappearing photons? | General Physics | 1 | ||
| 'Disappearing' | Introductory Physics Homework | 6 | ||