| New Reply |
Re{} and Im{} operators under the integral sign |
Share Thread | Thread Tools |
| Jun24-12, 08:41 AM | #1 |
|
|
Re{} and Im{} operators under the integral sign
Hello, I'm trying to figure out what hypothesis I need to swap the Re{} (or Im) operator and the integral sign, but I can't find anything on the matter. I guess either it's a trivial question or a rare one. Can someone help me?
Thanks in advance. |
| Jun24-12, 08:44 AM | #2 |
|
|
is the dummy variable real or complex?
|
| Jun24-12, 04:13 PM | #3 |
|
|
If your complex function is f(t)+ g(t)i where t is a real variable, and the integral is, say, [itex]\int Re(f)dt= \int f(t)dt[/itex], then, yes, that is the same as [itex]Re \int f(t)+ g(t)i dt[/itex] because that last integer is [itex]\int f(t)dt+ i\int g(t)dt[/itex].
If, however, f is a complex function of a complex variable that is not necessarily true. |
| Jun25-12, 02:59 PM | #4 |
|
|
Re{} and Im{} operators under the integral sign
thanks a lot!
|
| New Reply |
| Thread Tools | |
Similar Threads for: Re{} and Im{} operators under the integral sign
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | ||
| Sign Convention For Momentum Operators | Quantum Physics | 4 | ||
| Differentiation under the Integral Sign | Calculus & Beyond Homework | 1 | ||
| Integral sign in Latex | Math & Science Software | 1 | ||
| The sign of the integral | Calculus & Beyond Homework | 7 | ||
| Differentiation under the integral sign | Calculus | 4 | ||