Thread Closed

Britain aims to lead on nuclear energy

 
Share Thread Thread Tools
Jun15-12, 07:17 AM   #1
 

Britain aims to lead on nuclear energy


What do you think?

Britain aims to lead on nuclear energy
PhysOrg.com
PhysOrg
science news on PhysOrg.com

>> Galaxies fed by funnels of fuel
>> The better to see you with: Scientists build record-setting metamaterial flat lens
>> Google eyes emerging markets networks
Jun15-12, 09:03 AM   #2
 
Mentor
Blog Entries: 1
As a Briton I'm skeptical. We've had decades of dithering over our nuclear policy with endless NIMBY arguments and AFAIK we've been dimishing our nuclear power over the last decade or so. Only recently I thought I heard that a series of deals for energy firms bidding to construct nuclear reactors collapsed.

Coupled with the fact that in France nuclear accounts for 3-4 times more of their energy budget and the phrase "lead the way" begins to look like so much spin.

Having said that I do support increasing nuclear power in the UK, especially next generation designs. I'm hopeful that the UK can move away from fossil fuels over the next several decades as we have ample capacity for renewable and nuclear energy.
Jun16-12, 11:45 AM   #3
 
Recognitions:
Gold Membership Gold Member
Just remind planners not to put nuclear power plants at sea level....not a good idea.

After Japan's experience, I was surprised when I passed oneby boat in the Chesapeake Bay.....right at the water's edge...although not geologically active, still not a good idea!!
Jun16-12, 12:06 PM   #4
 
Recognitions:
Gold Membership Gold Member

Britain aims to lead on nuclear energy


Quote by Ryan_m_b View Post
in the UK, ... we have ample capacity for renewable ...
Ample? Apparently the UK has an average electric load of ~40 GWe, and a total, all uses, primary energy consumption rate of ~300 GW. Current the UK has about 6 GWe (peak) of wind installed. Are their some figures to show how the UK gets there on just renewables?
Jun16-12, 12:15 PM   #5
 
Quote by Naty1 View Post
Just remind planners not to put nuclear power plants at sea level....not a good idea.

After Japan's experience, I was surprised when I passed oneby boat in the Chesapeake Bay.....right at the water's edge...although not geologically active, still not a good idea!!
Not if it is adequately planned for. Some generators in a hardened shelter (tsunami proof) with underground power transmission lines might have averted the total power loss.



Ample? Apparently the UK has an average electric load of ~40 GW, and a total, all uses, primary energy consumption rate of 302 GW. Are their some figures to show how the UK gets there on just renewables?
According to this, you would need to blanket all of Wales in wind farms in order to get 1/6 of the UK's energy needs.
Jun16-12, 12:24 PM   #6
 
Recognitions:
Gold Membership Gold Member
Quote by aquitaine View Post
Not if it is adequately planned for. Some generators in a hardened shelter (tsunami proof) with underground power transmission lines might have averted the total power loss.





According to this, you would need to blanket all of Wales in wind farms in order to get 1/6 of the UK's energy needs.
McCay's referring to supplying *all* energy needs there, including air travel, heating, food, etc and not just the electric load. Electric powered air travel is a bit in the future yet.

Clearly much future wind installation will be off shore in the UK. Still, a minimum of 60,000 2MW offshore wind turbines would be needed to supply the UK electric load, and that's without addressing the backup needed for wind outages.
Jun28-12, 01:28 PM   #7
 
Recognitions:
Gold Membership Gold Member
Science Advisor Science Advisor
Retired Staff Staff Emeritus
Quote by mheslep View Post
McCay's referring to supplying *all* energy needs there, including air travel, heating, food, etc and not just the electric load. Electric powered air travel is a bit in the future yet.
Yeah. We are still working on the extension cord problem!

Clearly much future wind installation will be off shore in the UK. Still, a minimum of 60,000 2MW offshore wind turbines would be needed to supply the UK electric load, and that's without addressing the backup needed for wind outages.
Jun28-12, 08:56 PM   #8
 
Mentor
OT posts deleted. Please keep it on topic, guys. The title of the article is a somewhat clumsy paraphrase/truncation. The quote it was based on is about the UK leading in nuclear investment. In other words, to be building more than anyone else -- not to have more capacity (either absolute or in %).
Thread Closed

Tags
britain, nuclear
Thread Tools


Similar Threads for: Britain aims to lead on nuclear energy
Thread Forum Replies
Using multimeter, why do we hold its red lead to -ve and black lead to +ve terminal? Classical Physics 5
Recapture Pb (lead) from hydrocerussite (powered white lead) - HOW ? Materials & Chemical Engineering 1
Lead/Lag compensator - lead and lag time to pole and zero locations Engineering Systems & Design 2
Lead acid Batteries and UPS in nuclear power plants Electrical Engineering 2
Russia carrying out mock nuclear attack on US, Britain Current Events 10