New Reply

First Order Differential Equation with Reflected Argument

 
Share Thread Thread Tools
Sep7-12, 01:05 PM   #1
 

First Order Differential Equation with Reflected Argument


I am trying to solve:

(x + 1 + f(-x) )(1 - f ' (x) ) = x+1
f(0) = x_0
x in (-1,1)

I approximated it numerically but any analytic method I try fails. Any ideas?
PhysOrg.com
PhysOrg
science news on PhysOrg.com

>> Bird's playlist could signal mental strengths and weaknesses
>> Minus environment, patterns still emerge: Computational study tracks E. coli cells' regulatory mechanisms
>> Bacterium uses natural 'thermometer' to trigger diarrheal disease, scientists find
Sep7-12, 08:09 PM   #2
 
Recognitions:
Homework Helper Homework Help
Science Advisor Science Advisor
Hint: What do you get if you differentiate (x + 1 + f(-x) )? It should make you think of the chain rule.
Sep7-12, 11:57 PM   #3
 
Ok, so I can make a substitution:

y(x) = x + 1 + f(-x). Then

y ' (x) = 1 - f ' (-x).

I don't see where to go from there, since y ' (x) does not appear in the original equation. However

y ' (-x) = 1 - f ' (x) does appear in the original equation. If i make that substitution I get

y(x) * y ' (-x) = x+1

But I still do now know how to solve that. Is my reasoning correct so far?
Sep8-12, 12:06 AM   #4
 
Recognitions:
Homework Helper Homework Help
Science Advisor Science Advisor

First Order Differential Equation with Reflected Argument


Hmm.. yes I was too quick - I thought the minus sign would not be a problem.
However, you can at least try making an assumption about y(-x) and see if it produces a solution consistent with the assumption. I.e., try y(-x) = - y(x), then try y(-x) = y(x).
Sep8-12, 05:24 AM   #5
 
Judging from the numeric approximation, neither of those seem to be the case. I will try it and see what happens though.

I have tried many things. One thing I was considering was to use the cross correlation of f(x) with a conveniently chosen function, make a substitution, and use the Laplace transform to force the negative sign inside, then hope the inverse Laplace transform works out. That sounds really horribly complicated though.

I have tried a series solution but it did not seem to result in anything worthwhile.

Perhaps a solution does not exist.
Sep15-12, 11:54 PM   #6
 
Recognitions:
Homework Helper Homework Help
Science Advisor Science Advisor
I finaly realised that f(x) might as well be separate functions for x> 0 and x < 0. so write g( x) = f(-x). obtain (1-x+f(x))(-g'(x)) = 1-x by swapping sign of x. Write orig equation as g(x) = expression in x and f'(x), then differentiate that to obtain expression for g'(x) and substitute in above. Now have 2nd ord (nasty) equation in only f and x. Not sure it helps much though.
New Reply

Tags
argument, differential, equation, reflected, reflection
Thread Tools


Similar Threads for: First Order Differential Equation with Reflected Argument
Thread Forum Replies
Solution of two first order differential equation with one algebraic equation. Differential Equations 2
First order fringes being reflected back to the 0 order Classical Physics 3
2nd order differential equation using reduction of order Calculus & Beyond Homework 7
differential equation - 2nd order diff equation Calculus & Beyond Homework 5