Radioactive capture of proton and neutron


by mitch_1211
Tags: capture, emission, neutron, photon, proton
mitch_1211
mitch_1211 is offline
#1
Nov11-12, 05:32 PM
P: 99
Hi,

I'm considering the following process

n+p→d+[itex]\gamma[/itex] where d is the deuteron and [itex]\gamma[/itex] a photon.

I want to find out the energy of the photon. I know it will be much less than the rest mass of the deuteron (1875.666 MeV/c2). Can I simply use conservation of energy here?

i.e E[itex]\gamma[/itex] = Ei - Ef?

Thanks :)
Phys.Org News Partner Physics news on Phys.org
The hemihelix: Scientists discover a new shape using rubber bands (w/ video)
Mapping the road to quantum gravity
Chameleon crystals could enable active camouflage (w/ video)
Simon Bridge
Simon Bridge is offline
#2
Nov11-12, 05:57 PM
Homework
Sci Advisor
HW Helper
Thanks ∞
PF Gold
Simon Bridge's Avatar
P: 11,095
Energy is certainly conserved - yep.
Momentum is also conserved and photons carry momentum.
mitch_1211
mitch_1211 is offline
#3
Nov11-12, 06:57 PM
P: 99
So is it really as simple as E[itex]\gamma[/itex] = (En+Ep) - Ed?

Simon Bridge
Simon Bridge is offline
#4
Nov11-12, 09:17 PM
Homework
Sci Advisor
HW Helper
Thanks ∞
PF Gold
Simon Bridge's Avatar
P: 11,095

Radioactive capture of proton and neutron


Pretty much. On the scale of nuceons physics gets real simple ... and then it gets weird.
Anyway, the deuteron mass-deficit is termed it's "nuclear binding energy". This energy is released in fusion and you have to supply this energy for fission.
mitch_1211
mitch_1211 is offline
#5
Nov11-12, 09:21 PM
P: 99
thanks for clearing that up :)
mitch_1211
mitch_1211 is offline
#6
Nov12-12, 09:58 PM
P: 99
just one more thing, if considering the particles to be relativistic, is it still sufficient to apply simple energy conservation?

Or should the 4-vector formalism be used?
Simon Bridge
Simon Bridge is offline
#7
Nov12-12, 10:26 PM
Homework
Sci Advisor
HW Helper
Thanks ∞
PF Gold
Simon Bridge's Avatar
P: 11,095
It is usual to go right for the conservation laws - the math is normally done in center-of-mass coordinates. You use ##E_{tot}=\gamma mc^2## etc. It will be a linear transformation to the lab frame to get what your equipment is supposed to see.

In your example, if the proton and neutron are effectively at rest, then the photon and deuteron will have to go in opposite directions (to conserve momentum) ... so you do have a kinetic energy term to consider.

In general, the energy of the interaction can do all kinds of things ... for instance, there need not be only one photon. High energy photons can pair-produce ... all sorts of things. That's why when you look at the CERN stuff, the detectors are always shown with a shower of tracks inside them.


Register to reply

Related Discussions
Why do different nuclei need different neutron speed for neutron capture? High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics 5
neutron capture High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics 1
Is neutron-neutron fusion easier to facilitate than proton-proton General Physics 5
Induce radioactive decay via electron capture? High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics 2
Help with neutron capture High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics 5