New Reply

I found out new proof of Pythagorean theorem , how can I publish it ?

 
Share Thread Thread Tools
Nov14-12, 05:39 PM   #35
 
Blog Entries: 1
Recognitions:
Gold Membership Gold Member

I found out new proof of Pythagorean theorem , how can I publish it ?


Quote by Maths Lover View Post
first , I wonder about a abbrevitation all of you had used ! what does " OP " denote to ?!
Original poster, or original post according to context.
Nov14-12, 05:46 PM   #36
 
Quote by micromass View Post
Sorry for hijacking your thread here anyway
I didn't understand what you really want to say !

how can you Hijack my thread ?! is it a puzzle ?

explain please ?!
Nov14-12, 05:47 PM   #37
 
Quote by Jimmy Snyder View Post
Original poster, or original post according to context.
thank you , you made it obviousto me :)
Nov14-12, 05:49 PM   #38
 
Blog Entries: 8
Recognitions:
Gold Membership Gold Member
Science Advisor Science Advisor
Retired Staff Staff Emeritus
Quote by Maths Lover View Post
I didn't understand what you really want to say !

how can you Hijack my thread ?! is it a puzzle ?

explain please ?!
Hijacking a thread is when you start a pedantic argument about something useless that is not really what the OP wants to talk about.
Nov14-12, 05:49 PM   #39
 
@Micromass

so , any new proof for any theorem will be treated with the same way ?

or some theorems is diffrent from others ?


what about main theorms in calculus ?
Nov14-12, 05:52 PM   #40
 
Quote by micromass View Post
Hijacking a thread is when you start a pedantic argument about something useless that is not really what the OP wants to talk about.


ok :)

it's not a problem , I think that your speech wasn't " pedantic argument " , but it made somethings obvious

thank you :)
Nov14-12, 05:59 PM   #41
 
Blog Entries: 8
Recognitions:
Gold Membership Gold Member
Science Advisor Science Advisor
Retired Staff Staff Emeritus
Quote by Maths Lover View Post
@Micromass

so , any new proof for any theorem will be treated with the same way ?

or some theorems is diffrent from others ?


what about main theorms in calculus ?
No, I wouldn't say that they will all be treated the same way. I guess it depends on the proof itself. If the proof is really novel and provides some kind of idea that can be generalized, then it might be interesting to professionals. Or when the proof illustrates some kind of abstract theory.

A famous example is the insolvability of the quintic. This was originally proven by Abel and Ruffini. But later, Galois proved it using the methods of (what is now called) Galois theory. From a certain point of view, the theorem was already proven. But the proof Galois gave is very intricate and beautiful. Furthermore, it gives exactly a criterium of when a polynomial can be solved or not. And the same method can be generalized to other settings as well (such as integration theory). Finally, Galois theory is one of the most elegant mathematics known to man! Despite Galois theory not really proving anything novel, it is still one of the most important theories in mathematics out there.

If you are interested in Abel's theorem, then I highly recommend the following book: http://www.amazon.com/Abels-Theorem-.../dp/1402021860
It is suitable for high school students who are interested in higher level math. It introduces elegant theories such as groups and Riemann surfaces and it culminates with Abel's theorem.
Nov14-12, 06:04 PM   #42
 
Blog Entries: 1
Recognitions:
Gold Membership Gold Member
I was told that the original proof of the Riesz Representation theorem was 300 pages long. I don't know if it's true.
Nov14-12, 06:10 PM   #43
 
Quote by micromass View Post
No, I wouldn't say that they will all be treated the same way. I guess it depends on the proof itself. If the proof is really novel and provides some kind of idea that can be generalized, then it might be interesting to professionals. Or when the proof illustrates some kind of abstract theory.

A famous example is the insolvability of the quintic. This was originally proven by Abel and Ruffini. But later, Galois proved it using the methods of (what is now called) Galois theory. From a certain point of view, the theorem was already proven. But the proof Galois gave is very intricate and beautiful. Furthermore, it gives exactly a criterium of when a polynomial can be solved or not. And the same method can be generalized to other settings as well (such as integration theory). Finally, Galois theory is one of the most elegant mathematics known to man! Despite Galois theory not really proving anything novel, it is still one of the most important theories in mathematics out there.

If you are interested in Abel's theorem, then I highly recommend the following book: http://www.amazon.com/Abels-Theorem-.../dp/1402021860
It is suitable for high school students who are interested in higher level math. It introduces elegant theories such as groups and Riemann surfaces and it culminates with Abel's theorem.
I heared about Galois theory for 2 years .
as you know " I think that you know " that I study Abstract Algebra nowdays from Dummit and foote , and Galois theory is the topic of 14th chapter , and I'm very excited to reach this chapter but I still in the second one ,

:))
Nov14-12, 06:17 PM   #44
 
Blog Entries: 8
Recognitions:
Gold Membership Gold Member
Science Advisor Science Advisor
Retired Staff Staff Emeritus
Quote by Maths Lover View Post
I heared about Galois theory for 2 years .
as you know " I think that you know " that I study Abstract Algebra nowdays from Dummit and foote , and Galois theory is the topic of 14th chapter , and I'm very excited to reach this chapter but I still in the second one ,

:))
Ah, yes, I should have remembered!! But yes, Galois theory is very exciting. I just hope Dummit and Foote cover it the right way and don't try to obfusciate things. A lot of textbooks on Galois theory seem to have this problem.
Nov14-12, 06:18 PM   #45
 
Quote by Jimmy Snyder View Post
I was told that the original proof of the Riesz Representation theorem was 300 pages long. I don't know if it's true.
300 pages ! that's great ! and very comblicated too !!

I know the fermat last theorems needed 100 page from prof wiles to be writen !

the funny thing that I tried to find new proof to this Big theorem ! of course I failed " until now at least ! "
Nov14-12, 06:20 PM   #46
 
Quote by micromass View Post
Ah, yes, I should have remembered!! But yes, Galois theory is very exciting. I just hope Dummit and Foote cover it the right way and don't try to obfusciate things. A lot of textbooks on Galois theory seem to have this problem.
I hope the same :)

if he did , does artin cover it well ? or he obfuscated it !! ?
Nov14-12, 06:28 PM   #47
 
Speaking of proofs dont forget the book: Proofs from The Book

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proofs_from_THE_BOOK
Nov14-12, 06:30 PM   #48
 
Blog Entries: 8
Recognitions:
Gold Membership Gold Member
Science Advisor Science Advisor
Retired Staff Staff Emeritus
Quote by Maths Lover View Post
I hope the same :)

if he did , does artin cover it well ? or he obfuscated it !! ?
I don't really remember his treatment well. But I really like Artin, so I guess he did a good job.

If you're looking for beautiful treatments of Galois theory, then the following books are exellent:

http://www.amazon.com/Galois-Theory-...+galois+theory (this is not the same Artin as the one who wrote the algebra book)

http://www.amazon.com/Abels-Theorem-...ds=Arnold+Abel
Nov14-12, 06:31 PM   #49
 
Blog Entries: 8
Recognitions:
Gold Membership Gold Member
Science Advisor Science Advisor
Retired Staff Staff Emeritus
Quote by jedishrfu View Post
Speaking of proofs dont forget the book: Proofs from The Book

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proofs_from_THE_BOOK
Ah yes! One of the most beautiful math books out there!
Nov14-12, 06:33 PM   #50
 
Quote by micromass View Post
I don't really remember his treatment well. But I really like Artin, so I guess he did a good job.

If you're looking for beautiful treatments of Galois theory, then the following books are exellent:

http://www.amazon.com/Galois-Theory-...+galois+theory (this is not the same Artin as the one who wrote the algebra book)

http://www.amazon.com/Abels-Theorem-...ds=Arnold+Abel
that's great :)
but as you know , I have to study Group theory and Field theory first :)
I think that it's not easy job , is it ?
Nov17-12, 02:43 AM   #51
 
Hey Maths lover, just out of curiosity what is your native language?
New Reply
Thread Tools


Similar Threads for: I found out new proof of Pythagorean theorem , how can I publish it ?
Thread Forum Replies
proof of the Pythagorean theorem using Dimensional analysis General Math 1
Proof of Pythagorean Theorem... General Math 14
My proof involving Pythagorean’s Theorem Calculus & Beyond Homework 4
My proof involving Pythagorean’s Theorem Calculus & Beyond Homework 0
Pythagorean Theorem proof Vector Calc. Due tomorrow 9am. PLEASE HELP!! Calculus & Beyond Homework 2