Register to reply

Laplace Equation Solved by Method of Separation of Variables

Share this thread:
6Stang7
#1
Nov12-12, 08:36 PM
P: 213
1. The problem statement, all variables and given/known data



2. Relevant equations
Assume the solution has a form of:


3. The attempt at a solution






It looks like a sine Fourier series except for the 2c5 term outside of the series, so I'm not sure how to go about solving for the coefficients c5 and c10. Any idea?
Phys.Org News Partner Science news on Phys.org
Experts defend operational earthquake forecasting, counter critiques
EU urged to convert TV frequencies to mobile broadband
Sierra Nevada freshwater runoff could drop 26 percent by 2100
voko
#2
Nov13-12, 06:56 AM
Thanks
P: 5,801
When lambda is zero, X(x) is identically zero, which means X(x)Y(y) is also zero. So there must be nothing in front of the series.
6Stang7
#3
Nov13-12, 08:45 PM
P: 213
Quote Quote by voko View Post
When lambda is zero, X(x) is identically zero, which means X(x)Y(y) is also zero. So there must be nothing in front of the series.
Ahhh, so for there to be a term outside the sum due to lambda=0, you must have non-zero values for both X(x) AND Y(y)? Makes sense! :D

LCKurtz
#4
Nov13-12, 09:24 PM
HW Helper
Thanks
PF Gold
LCKurtz's Avatar
P: 7,665
Laplace Equation Solved by Method of Separation of Variables

I am puzzled by the boundary condition$$
\left. \frac{\partial u}{\partial y}\right |_{y=0} = u(x,0)$$Is that supposed to be the same ##u## on both sides? Or is it just another way to say something like$$
u_y(x,0) = f(x)$$some arbitrary function ##f##?
6Stang7
#5
Nov14-12, 11:49 PM
P: 213
Quote Quote by LCKurtz View Post
I am puzzled by the boundary condition$$
\left. \frac{\partial u}{\partial y}\right |_{y=0} = u(x,0)$$Is that supposed to be the same ##u## on both sides? Or is it just another way to say something like$$
u_y(x,0) = f(x)$$some arbitrary function ##f##?
It is suppose to be u on both sides; that boundary condition is stating: Y'(0)X(x)=Y(0)X(x) since it was assumed the solution to u(x,y) had the form of X(x)Y(y).
LCKurtz
#6
Nov15-12, 11:17 AM
HW Helper
Thanks
PF Gold
LCKurtz's Avatar
P: 7,665
OK. With that clarification for me, I would just comment about the last three lines. You already know you should have no eigenfunction for ##\lambda = 0##. Your eigenvalues are ##\lambda_n = n\pi##. Your third line from the bottom should read for the eigenfunctions ##Y_n##$$
Y_n(y) = n\pi\cosh(n\pi y)+\sinh(n\pi y)$$You don't need a constant multiple in front of them and there shouldn't be an ##x## in front of the ##\cosh## term. Similarly your eigenfunctions for ##X## are$$
X_n(x) = \sin(n\pi x)$$ Then you write your potential solution as$$
u(x,y) =\sum_{n=1}^\infty c_nX_n(x)Y_n(y)=
\sum_{n=1}^\infty c_n\sin(n\pi x)(n\pi\cosh(n\pi y)+\sinh(n\pi y))$$Now you are ready for the Fourier Series solution to the last boundary condition.


Register to reply

Related Discussions
Separation of variables, laplace equation Advanced Physics Homework 0
Separation of variables - Laplace's Equation Calculus & Beyond Homework 1
Laplace DE separation of variables Calculus & Beyond Homework 3
About Separation of Variables for the Laplace Equation Advanced Physics Homework 3
Laplace Cylindrical Coordinates (Separation of variables) Differential Equations 2