New Reply

transpose a matrix whose elements are themselves matrices

 
Share Thread
Nov21-12, 09:07 AM   #1
 

transpose a matrix whose elements are themselves matrices


If I have (for simplicity) a vector ( A, B) where A and B are matrices how does the transpose of this look, is it ( AT, BT) or

(AT
BT)
PhysOrg.com science news on PhysOrg.com

>> Leading 3-D printer firms to merge in $403M deal (Update)
>> LA to give every student an iPad; $30M order
>> CIA faulted for choosing Amazon over IBM on cloud contract
Nov21-12, 10:05 AM   #2
 
Think about what the dimension should be.
Nov21-12, 11:31 AM   #3
 
or

(A
B)
Nov21-12, 11:44 AM   #4
 

transpose a matrix whose elements are themselves matrices


Quote by Robert1986 View Post
Think about what the dimension should be.
Sorry, I don't really understand what you mean by "dimension" in this case;

I know that the transpose of a 1x2 matrix should be a 2x1 matrix but I don't know whether the elements actually inside the matrix should be transposed once I make the matrix a 2x1.

Thank you in advance for any help.
Nov21-12, 01:54 PM   #5
 
From wikipedia:
In linear algebra, the transpose of a matrix A is another matrix AT (also written A′, Atr or At) created by any one of the following equivalent actions:
reflect A over its main diagonal (which runs top-left to bottom-right) to obtain AT
write the rows of A as the columns of AT
write the columns of A as the rows of AT
It doesn't say that anything should be done to the elements of the matrix so I guess it would be just
A
B
(columns of A written as rows)
Nov21-12, 06:01 PM   #6
 
Mentor
Quote by robotsheep View Post
Sorry, I don't really understand what you mean by "dimension" in this case;
He meant that you should think about the number of rows and columns. However, this only helps is you interpret the notation in the first of the two ways I'm describing below.

Quote by robotsheep View Post
I know that the transpose of a 1x2 matrix should be a 2x1 matrix but I don't know whether the elements actually inside the matrix should be transposed once I make the matrix a 2x1.
If A and B are 2×2 matrices for example, then I would interpret a notation like (A B) not as a 1×2 matrix whose elements are are 2×2 matrices, but as a 2×4 matrix whose 11, 12, 21 and 22 elements are respectively the 11, 12, 21, 22 elements of A, and whose 13, 14, 23, 24 elements are respectively the 11, 12, 21, 22 elements of B. With this interpretation of the notation, it's obvious that the transpose of (A B) is
$$\begin{pmatrix}A^T\\ B^T\end{pmatrix}.$$ If you instead interpret it as a 1×2 matrix whose elements are are 2×2 matrices, then the standard definition of "transpose" would of course just give you
$$\begin{pmatrix}A\\ B\end{pmatrix}.$$ I think the former interpretation is far more useful, and I assume that to some authors, this is a reason to use a different definition of "transpose", so that you can think of (A B) as a 1×2 matrix, and still have its transpose be
$$\begin{pmatrix}A^T\\ B^T\end{pmatrix}.$$ I don't see any reason to use a definition that makes ##\begin{pmatrix}A & B\end{pmatrix}^T=\begin{pmatrix}A^T & B^T\end{pmatrix}##.
Nov21-12, 06:14 PM   #7
 
Quote by Fredrik View Post
He meant that you should think about the number of rows and columns. However, this only helps is you interpret the notation in the first of the two ways I'm describing below.


If A and B are 2×2 matrices for example, then I would interpret a notation like (A B) not as a 1×2 matrix whose elements are are 2×2 matrices, but as a 2×4 matrix whose 11, 12, 21 and 22 elements are respectively the 11, 12, 21, 22 elements of A, and whose 13, 14, 23, 24 elements are respectively the 11, 12, 21, 22 elements of B. With this interpretation of the notation, it's obvious that the transpose of (A B) is
$$\begin{pmatrix}A^T\\ B^T\end{pmatrix}.$$ If you instead interpret it as a 1×2 matrix whose elements are are 2×2 matrices, then the standard definition of "transpose" would of course just give you
$$\begin{pmatrix}A\\ B\end{pmatrix}.$$ I think the former interpretation is far more useful, and I assume that to some authors, this is a reason to use a different definition of "transpose", so that you can think of (A B) as a 1×2 matrix, and still have its transpose be
$$\begin{pmatrix}A^T\\ B^T\end{pmatrix}.$$ I don't see any reason to use a definition that makes ##\begin{pmatrix}A & B\end{pmatrix}^T=\begin{pmatrix}A^T & B^T\end{pmatrix}##.
Thank you, this really cleared it up for me.
New Reply

Tags
matrix, transpose

Similar discussions for: transpose a matrix whose elements are themselves matrices
Thread Forum Replies
Matrices: Transpose and Inverse Precalculus Mathematics Homework 5
Square of transpose of two matrices Precalculus Mathematics Homework 10
Transformation of A = transpose[A] for mxn Matrices Calculus & Beyond Homework 1
Linear algebra matrices multiplication (transpose) Precalculus Mathematics Homework 2
silly question about matrices with matrix elements Linear & Abstract Algebra 7