XRD limitation in detection of a second phase with low amount


by mah65
Tags: detection, limitation, phase
mah65
mah65 is offline
#1
Nov14-12, 01:54 PM
P: 22
I have performed heat treatment (aging) on my alloy. In this process fine precipitates form in the matrix of the alloy, which strengthen the alloy.

However, XRD spectrum could not show the peaks related to the fine precipitates.

1- Why the peaks are not detectable? Is it because of the very small size of the precipitates? Or, is it because of their low content? What is the X-Ray method limitation in detecting a phase?

(I would appreciate it if you also introduce a reference, because I need to mention it in my paper)

2- What solutions and especially what other X-ray methods can help in detecting the precipitates? Can "small step scan XRD" be helpful in this respect?

Thank you :)
Phys.Org News Partner Engineering news on Phys.org
SensaBubble: It's a bubble, but not as we know it (w/ video)
WSU innovation improves drowsy driver detection
Faster computation of electromagnetic interference on an electronic circuit board
chemisttree
chemisttree is offline
#2
Nov27-12, 10:20 PM
Sci Advisor
HW Helper
PF Gold
chemisttree's Avatar
P: 3,725
If the second phase is poorly crystallized or amorphous, you won't get much signal. What do you know, exactly, about the second phase.
mah65
mah65 is offline
#3
Nov28-12, 01:05 PM
P: 22
The second phase in totally crystalline. We know the approximate position of the peaks (= the related 2teta) in XRD spectrum. We detected no such peaks in those positions, however. What can we do?

uby
uby is offline
#4
Dec6-12, 02:19 PM
P: 176

XRD limitation in detection of a second phase with low amount


Signal to noise ratio will determine whether you see a peak (assuming the material is present). Signal will be proportional to the volume fraction of the phase present. If the domains are small (< ~300 nm), the signal will be diminished and broadened over a larger 2-theta range. The differential xray absorption behavior of the alloy and precipitate will also play a role in the relative signal.

XRD generally does not have robust lower detection limits. TEM would allow for direct characterization of the precipitates.
Alkim
Alkim is offline
#5
Dec24-12, 12:53 PM
P: 98
You can try performing slower measurements and if that does not help either, you can also try using synchrotron radiation.
zahirani
zahirani is offline
#6
Jan23-13, 12:41 AM
P: 1
XRD does not detect the presence of very small quantity of phase even though it is present in the materials.

Sometimes the peak is there, but get clouded with background radiation. This maybe due to the intensity of the peak is too low. In certain XRD software (X`pert Highscore Plus), you can remove/reduce the background radiation.

Alternatively, you can use SEM to identify the precipitate, but I never done that before.

My research involves the addition of MgO into Al2O3, the presence of Al2O3 only detected when the amount of MgO reach 0.9 wt %. The result is here - http://www.sciencedirect.com/science...25838810005347.

Hope it helps.


Register to reply

Related Discussions
First and Second modes of generations and limitation Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics 1
Optical phase detection Classical Physics 1
Limitation of ratios ? General Math 10
Current Limitation in a PN junction Advanced Physics Homework 0