Register to reply

Confusing velocity distribution result

Share this thread:
zn5252
#1
Dec2-12, 05:17 AM
P: 73
hello,
Please see attached excerpt of a solution to a problem. I do not understand why the result obtained is to second order ? (this is a diffusion equation they say)
Please let me know if you would need more info.
Thanks,
Attached Thumbnails
Screenshot.png  
Phys.Org News Partner Science news on Phys.org
Experts defend operational earthquake forecasting, counter critiques
EU urged to convert TV frequencies to mobile broadband
Sierra Nevada freshwater runoff could drop 26 percent by 2100
HallsofIvy
#2
Dec2-12, 07:46 AM
Math
Emeritus
Sci Advisor
Thanks
PF Gold
P: 39,568
What does "at n- 1" mean?
zn5252
#3
Dec2-12, 09:13 AM
P: 73
n-1 means at the step which is prior to step n where n is the number of boosts . I have attached the first paragraph for more details.
Attached Thumbnails
Screenshot-1.png  

haruspex
#4
Dec2-12, 09:32 PM
Homework
Sci Advisor
HW Helper
Thanks
P: 9,874
Confusing velocity distribution result

It's because the first order differences will cancel out: f(x+dx) + f(x-dx) ≈ f(x) + f'(x)dx + f''(x)dx2/2 + f(x) - f'(x)dx + f''(x)dx2/2 = 2f(x) + f''(x)dx2
zn5252
#5
Dec3-12, 01:18 PM
P: 73
I see. Thanks a lot !


Register to reply

Related Discussions
Integration result ln || - confusing and apparent contradictions! Calculus 4
Why am I getting the wrong result for the expected value of an F-distribution? Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics 1
Integrability, basic measure theory: seeking help with confusing result Calculus 7
Confusing result about the spectrum of compact operators Calculus 1
Radial distribution function - weird result Atomic, Solid State, Comp. Physics 1