Confusing velocity distribution result

by zn5252
Tags: confusing, distribution, result, velocity
zn5252 is offline
Dec2-12, 05:17 AM
P: 73
Please see attached excerpt of a solution to a problem. I do not understand why the result obtained is to second order ? (this is a diffusion equation they say)
Please let me know if you would need more info.
Attached Thumbnails
Phys.Org News Partner Science news on
Going nuts? Turkey looks to pistachios to heat new eco-city
Space-tested fluid flow concept advances infectious disease diagnoses
SpaceX launches supplies to space station (Update)
HallsofIvy is online now
Dec2-12, 07:46 AM
Sci Advisor
PF Gold
P: 38,882
What does "at n- 1" mean?
zn5252 is offline
Dec2-12, 09:13 AM
P: 73
n-1 means at the step which is prior to step n where n is the number of boosts . I have attached the first paragraph for more details.
Attached Thumbnails

haruspex is offline
Dec2-12, 09:32 PM
Sci Advisor
HW Helper
Thanks ∞
P: 9,161

Confusing velocity distribution result

It's because the first order differences will cancel out: f(x+dx) + f(x-dx) ≈ f(x) + f'(x)dx + f''(x)dx2/2 + f(x) - f'(x)dx + f''(x)dx2/2 = 2f(x) + f''(x)dx2
zn5252 is offline
Dec3-12, 01:18 PM
P: 73
I see. Thanks a lot !

Register to reply

Related Discussions
integration result ln || - confusing and apparent contradictions! Calculus 4
Why am I getting the wrong result for the expected value of an F-distribution? Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics 1
Integrability, basic measure theory: seeking help with confusing result Calculus 7
Confusing result about the spectrum of compact operators Calculus 1
Radial distribution function -- weird result Atomic, Solid State, Comp. Physics 1