Register to reply 
The student's acceptance or rejection of 0.999...=1 
Share this thread: 
#37
Dec1112, 01:29 PM

Mentor
P: 18,346

But first you need to say what you mean with "decimal expansion" in the first place? 


#38
Dec1112, 02:09 PM

Mentor
P: 21,397

Besides 1.0 being equal to 0.9999..., there are also 0.5 = 0.49999 ... 0.6 = 0.59999... and on and on. 


#39
Dec1112, 03:49 PM

P: 234




#40
Dec1112, 10:29 PM

Mentor
P: 18,346




#41
Dec1212, 12:18 AM

Mentor
P: 21,397

Consider the sequence {a_{n}} = ##\{1  10^{n}\}_{n = 1}^{\infty}## a_{1} = 0.9 a_{2} = 0.99 a_{3} = 0.999 . . . a_{n} = 0.999...9 (terminates after the nth 9) Each number in the sequence has a finite number of 9's following the decimal point, but it should be clear that the limit of the sequence is 1. 


#42
Dec1212, 08:29 AM

P: 234




#43
Dec1212, 08:53 AM

P: 82

From experience in another physics forum, this has the ring of a similar problem often encountered in physics: that of definitions. (Lay)People (like myself) often get confused about a topic by assigning it undue complexity/special stature when at its core it is a definition rather than a revelation.
If I'm understanding right, then this idea of 0.999... equaling 1 is a language definition, not a hint at some deeper property of real numbers. It's boring, but on the other hand, it saves one time from looking for meaning in something that was never defined to have any deeper meaning about numbers or infinitesimals. 


#44
Dec1212, 08:58 AM

Emeritus
Sci Advisor
PF Gold
P: 16,091

[tex] \begin{matrix} \tiny{ 1} & . & \tiny{ 9} & \tiny{ 9} & \tiny{ 9} & \cdots \\ \not2 & . & \not 0 & \not 0 &\not 0 &\cdots \\ 1 & . & 0 & 0 & 0 & \cdots \\\hline 0 & . & 9 & 9 & 9 & \cdots \end{matrix} [/tex] 0.9999....98 = 9999....98 / 10000....00, where all of the ellipses represent the same number of digits. 


#45
Dec1212, 09:11 AM

HW Helper
P: 2,264

You must be trolling 1=1/1=0.9999...
Decimal expansions are real numbers by definition. The sequence of digits is not equal, but they represent the same real number. In binary we have 1=.111111111... In trinary 1=.22222222222... 


#46
Dec1212, 07:39 PM

Math
Emeritus
Sci Advisor
Thanks
PF Gold
P: 39,682

In my opinion, the simplest, most straightforward, proof that 0.9999... = 1 is in terms of "geometric series". 0.9999...= .9+ .09+ .009+ .0009+ ...= .9+ .9(1/10)+ .9(1/100)+ .9(1/1000)+ ...= .9(1+ 1/10+ 1/100+ 1/1000+ ...)= .9(1+ (1/10)+ (1/10)^2+ (1/10)^3+ .... That is, it is a geometric series [tex]\sum ar^n[/tex] with a= .9 and r= 1/10. The sum of that is [tex]\frac{.9}{1 1/10}= \frac{.9}{.9}= 1[/tex].
If you protest that you want an explanation that does not require infinite series, I would counter that you can't understand nonterminating decimal expanasions without using infinite series. 


#47
Dec1212, 08:24 PM

Emeritus
Sci Advisor
PF Gold
P: 9,533

A "proof of 0.999...=1" only tells us that the series ##\sum_{n=1}^\infty 9\cdot 10^{n}## is convergent and has the sum 1. This is interpreted as a proof of 0.999...=1, because the standard definition of 0.999... says that the string of text "0.999..." represents the sum of that series.
I think that a person who struggles with the equality 0.999...=1 would benefit as much or more from hearing an explanation of why that definition is standard, as from seeing a proof of ##\sum_{n=1}^\infty 9\cdot 10^{n}=1##. They probably think that this is an entirely different problem. 


#48
Dec1212, 09:12 PM

P: 234

[itex]\frac{10^{n}  1}{10^{n}}[/itex] = 0.999... = 1 [itex]\frac{10^{n}}{10^{n}}  \frac{1}{10^{n}}[/itex] = 1 [itex]1  \frac{1}{10^{n}}[/itex] = 1 [itex]1  (1) \frac{1}{10^{n}}[/itex] = 1 (1) [itex] \frac{1}{10^{n}}[/itex] = 0 Houston we have a problem! That is why we cannot equate infinities to rational numbers without bending the rules. (I know the next post is the limit of [itex] \frac{1}{10^{n}}[/itex] = 0) 


#49
Dec1212, 09:25 PM

P: 166

Your step 2 needs some explaining. [itex]\frac{10^n}{10^n}  \frac{1}{10^n} = 1[/itex] only holds when n = 0. Unless you'd like to claim that [itex]\frac{1}{1}  \frac{1}{10^5} = 1[/itex] where n=5.
The limit expresses what happens as n approaches infinity. For any n < infinity, you don't have [itex].\overline{999}[/itex], you have .999...90. 


#50
Dec1212, 09:50 PM

Mentor
P: 21,397

Since you don't include any indication that you are taking the limit, then none of the equations below follow. 


#51
Dec1212, 09:56 PM

Emeritus
Sci Advisor
PF Gold
P: 16,091

One learns how to do arithmetic with terminating decimals early; if you learn the variations that work left to right, then those same elementary school algorithms for doing arithmetic can be used for nonterminating decimals too. I've even seen people define the real numbers in this manner: numbers are strings of digits (modulo relations like 0.999... = 1.000...), and the arithmetic operations are given as explicit algorithms that operate on strings of digits. The algorithms for addition and subtraction give yet another reason why 0.999... = 1.000...; for example, when subtracting 1 from 2, you can either have no borrows, or you can have a borrow in every place. Of course, one could resolve the ambiguity by disallowing decimals ending in all 9's Interestingly, in the text I saw use this approach, I believe it did exactly the opposite: it disallowed terminating decimals! So "0.999..." was a legal decimal, but "1" was not. 


#52
Dec1212, 11:20 PM

Mentor
P: 18,346

What is n anyway? 


#54
Dec1312, 07:20 AM

P: 166




Register to reply 
Related Discussions  
Can I create 'rejection'?  General Discussion  4  
Acceptance/rejection dates for Perimeter Scholars Institute (Canada)?  Academic Guidance  10  
Reason of rejection  Quantum Physics  2  
Heat rejection.  General Physics  7  
Acceptance & Rejection  General Discussion  48 