
#1
Dec2012, 09:31 PM

P: 183

In physics class today, our teacher wanted to demonstrate that mass doesn't have an effect on fall speed. (The class was about gravitational potential energy becoming kinetic, mgh = 1/2 *mv^2 and all that)
Here was the set up: He had a small rail (two parallel thin metal poles) sloping down, becoming completely horizontal at the end, then leading off of a table. He would roll a dense metal spherical ball bearing down the rail, it would roll down the slope, roll off with a horizontal velocity and roll off of the table onto the floor. Where the ball would land, he had a piece of carbon paper over a piece of copy paper, such that the ball would leave an imprint right where it landed. He rolled a small ball bearing and a larger metal ball (3 or 4 times the radius). But each time he tried, the metal ball would always travel 4 or 5 inches further than the small ball. He tried lining up the middles and being careful in general, but the large ball always travelled farther. The teacher was a little bit disturbed. Air resistance and friction should be negligible in this example. So... Why should the large ball go significantly farther? I thought about this for a bit. I thought that maybe some of the energy in the larger ball was going into rotational kinetic energy. But as the velocity of the center of mass is equal to the tangential velocity of rotation, the kinetic energy lost to rotational kinetic energy should be proportional for both the large and small balls. In other words, I don't see how the radius would affect the velocity. So what gives!? Thanks. 



#2
Dec2012, 10:03 PM

P: 208

Clearly it must be friction somewhere in the system, because the velocity at the bottom is independent of mass as are the equations describing horizontal and vertical positions with respect to time.




#3
Dec2012, 10:04 PM

PF Gold
P: 10,992

I'd guess that the larger ball has more mass and takes longer to lose its energy to friction.




#4
Dec2012, 10:05 PM

P: 183

Radius of ball matters in fall speed! 



#5
Dec2012, 10:09 PM

Sci Advisor
P: 2,470

Rotational KE actually does reduce speed off the ramp.
PE > KE ##\small mgh = \frac{1}{2}mv^2 + \frac{1}{2}I\omega^2## Now, for a solid sphere of uniform density, ##\small I = \frac{2}{5}mR^2##. And for any rolling object ##\small v = \omega R##. ##\small mgh = \frac{1}{2}mv^2 + \frac{1}{2}\left(\frac{2}{5}mR^2\right)\left(\frac{v}{R}\right)^2 = (\frac{1}{2} + \frac{1}{5})mv^2## In other words, instead of ##\small v=\sqrt{2gh}## for point mass, for a solid sphere you get ##\small v=\sqrt{\frac{10}{7}gh}##, which is significantly smaller. So now that we've established that rotation does matter, it should be clear that varying moment of inertia will result in different speed off the ramp. A cylinder, for example, will roll off the ramp traveling slower than a sphere. If the larger sphere had a heavier core and a lighter shell, it would readily explain the situation. If both spheres were perfectly uniform, then friction is all you have left. How large was the ball bearing? Of course, with distances involved, the small bearing would have to be pretty tiny to make a difference that significant. That's why I ask you how big it actually is. 



#6
Dec2012, 10:24 PM

P: 183

I don't have very accurate measurements of this ball. I was only observing the teacher handle the ball in the front of the class 16 hours ago. But from my memory I'd say it was about... 1.5 to 2 inches in diameter. Would a ball of that size typically be made out of different material? 



#7
Dec2012, 11:06 PM

Sci Advisor
Thanks
P: 2,938





#8
Dec2012, 11:20 PM

P: 183

However, the space between the poles might have an effect on the balls. The large ball is essentially on a flat surface, while small ball has the two poles touching very close to the ball's axis. Now, the rotational kinetic energy of ball is dependent on the tangential velocity of the outermost rotating particles. When the ball is rolling on the ground, this tangential velocity is equal to the velocity at the center of mass. However, in this rail case, what might be happening is that the tangential velocity is equal to the much more than the center of mass velocity, because the tangential velocity that is equal to the center of mass velocity is the velocity of the particles closer to the center. In this way, the rotational energy will sap more energy from the kinetic energy when the ball is smaller on this ramp. I will talk to the teacher tomorrow and perhaps we will conduct the experiment with a flat board instead of the rails and see what happens. 



#9
Dec2112, 07:06 AM

Sci Advisor
P: 2,470

I can't believe I didn't think of this right away. I was even picturing it correctly in my head with the two wires, and the ball rolling close to axis... Guh. Mystery solved, people. Move along. 


Register to reply 
Related Discussions  
Ball in freefall  Introductory Physics Homework  3  
Ball in free fall  Introductory Physics Homework  4  
Where the ball will fall?  Introductory Physics Homework  12  
Matters of GravityFall issue out today  Beyond the Standard Model  0  
when will ball fall off?  Introductory Physics Homework  20 