Register to reply

Order to Read Quantum Mechanics Books.

by n10Newton
Tags: books, mechanics, order, quantum
Share this thread:
n10Newton
#1
Dec27-12, 09:35 AM
P: 108
Please Suggest what will be the order as Elementry to Intermediate to Advanced.
Is this Correct Choice Griffith's"Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" to Shanker."Principles of Quantum Mechanics" to Sakurai."Modern Quantum Mechanics".And After Completing All "Principles of Quantum Mechanics" by PAM Dirac.
Phys.Org News Partner Science news on Phys.org
World's largest solar boat on Greek prehistoric mission
Google searches hold key to future market crashes
Mineral magic? Common mineral capable of making and breaking bonds
dextercioby
#2
Dec27-12, 02:27 PM
Sci Advisor
HW Helper
P: 11,895
I would replace Shankar's book with Leslie Ballentine's text as a parallel to Sakurai's.
n10Newton
#3
Dec27-12, 05:08 PM
P: 108
Well The book may be good but not available in my country.

dextercioby
#4
Dec28-12, 05:21 AM
Sci Advisor
HW Helper
P: 11,895
Order to Read Quantum Mechanics Books.

If those 4 are your only available texts, then yes, the order you have chosen is the right one.
n10Newton
#5
Dec28-12, 05:37 AM
P: 108
These also available.
1.Quantum Mechanics by B. H. Bransden, C. J. Joachain
2.Introductory Quantum Mechanics by Richard Liboff
3.Quantum Mechanics by Eugen Merzbacher
4.Quantum Mechanics by Aruldhas G
5.Advanced Quantum Mechanics by Sakurai.

My country has all Imprints of Pearson(Addison-Wesely), Prentice Hall, McGraw Hill & Wiley. Remaining all Imported Edition so Price is vey High.
dextercioby
#6
Dec28-12, 05:50 AM
Sci Advisor
HW Helper
P: 11,895
Then you can choose either Bransden or Liboff for the introductory text instead of Griffiths and Merzbacher as a supplimentary reading to Sakurai's MODERN (not Advanced) Quantum Mechanics and remove Shankar's text altogether.

The <Advanced Quantum Mechanics> text by Sakurai' is actually more QFT than QM, it's from the 1960's and uses an old fashioned relativistic notation (but has valuable insights nonetheless). You can use real and newer QFT texts instead of it.
n10Newton
#7
Dec28-12, 05:59 AM
P: 108
Thanks. I was thinking Griffith the Ultimate basic. but as elementry I choose Liboff now. so order will be Liboff to Griffith to Sakurai. to Dirac.
Jack21222
#8
Dec28-12, 06:44 AM
P: 772
You could throw in Modern Physics by Serway/Moses/Moyer before Griffith as a sophomore-level text.
Crake2
#9
Dec28-12, 06:53 AM
P: 7
What about zetilli's book? Quantum Mechanics: Concepts and Applications by Nouredine Zettili (http://www.amazon.com/Quantum-Mechan...ywords=zetilli)
MathematicalPhysicist
#10
Dec30-12, 02:12 AM
P: 3,220
One of the reasons that there are quite alot of textbooks on QM is that not everyone put the same emphasis on the same topics. I think it's a good idea to use several references.
For me it was a combination of Cohen-Tanoudji, Schwable, Messiah,Atkinson's. Also look for exercise with solutions textbooks.
radium
#11
Jan1-13, 12:20 AM
P: 73
When I started to learn quantum mechanics for research purposes last spring I think I started with a combination of Griffiths and a modern physics textbook I used for class (I used Tipler but I would not recommend it at all), then Shankar, then Sakurai. It helps to read chapters in Sakurai more than once though (for example read the first three chapters then go back and read them again while going on to the next chapter). It also helps to be familiar with Hamiltonian mechanics/formalism.
n10Newton
#12
Jan1-13, 11:46 PM
P: 108
Well, Modern Physics before Quantum Mechanics is very helpful but I already studied Modern Physics from Krane and some in Introductory Text "University Physics" so I directly started the Quantum.


Register to reply

Related Discussions
Quantum mechanics books Science & Math Textbooks 3
Do I need Classical mechanics and waves in order to understand Quantum mechanics? Academic Guidance 22
What to learn/read to understand quantum mechanics deeper? Academic Guidance 12
Which book to read after quantum mechanics Science & Math Textbooks 1
Good books on quantum mechanics? General Discussion 18