Register to reply

Nordheim-Fuchs Model

by doublemint
Tags: model, nordheimfuchs
Share this thread:
doublemint
#1
Jan1-13, 12:08 PM
P: 142
I am looking at the equations for maximum flux/power and energy deposited from the power pulse with reactivity increase >1$ in the Nordheim-Fuchs Model:
P=[itex]\frac{\Lambda \omega^{2}}{2\alpha_{FT}K}[/itex]

E=[itex]\frac{2(\rho-\beta)}{K\alpha_{FT}}[/itex]

With a negative temperature coefficient (\alpha_{FT}), shouldn't the above equations be negative? I've looked at other examples that include reactors with a negative temp coefficient, and they all produce a positive value (they don't show the calculations, just the graphs).

It seems like that just ignore the negative sign, but I want to know why.
Phys.Org News Partner Science news on Phys.org
Experts defend operational earthquake forecasting, counter critiques
EU urged to convert TV frequencies to mobile broadband
Sierra Nevada freshwater runoff could drop 26 percent by 2100

Register to reply

Related Discussions
Fowler-nordheim tunneling Quantum Physics 1
Probability of specular reflection in Fuchs theory for copper Atomic, Solid State, Comp. Physics 0
Range of Nordheim parameter y Atomic, Solid State, Comp. Physics 0
Fowler Nordheim Tunnelling - Plz Help Quantum Physics 6
Chris Fuchs Comments on Quantum Crypto Quantum Physics 3