Register to reply

Drell Yan process

by JoePhysicsNut
Tags: drell yan
Share this thread:
JoePhysicsNut
#1
Jan29-13, 10:41 AM
P: 34


The Feynman diagram for Drell Yan has a gamma-star or a Z as the mediator.

Does gamma-star simply mean a photon with a sizeable amount of energy?
Is there a well-defined point in the energy of the mediator when it's a Z instead of a gamma-star? The peak of the Z resonance on an invariant mass plot is 91 GeV, but as a wide resonance it could also have less energy than that.
If a W acts as the mediator, is it still classified as Drell Yan?
Phys.Org News Partner Physics news on Phys.org
On-chip topological light: First measurements of transmission and delay
A two-stage trap for single protons leads to measurement of their magnetic properties
Unexpected phenomenon discovered at the surface of a transition metal oxide material
Bill_K
#2
Jan29-13, 11:06 AM
Sci Advisor
Thanks
Bill_K's Avatar
P: 4,160
Is there a well-defined point in the energy of the mediator when it's a Z instead of a gamma-star? The peak of the Z resonance on an invariant mass plot is 91 GeV, but as a wide resonance it could also have less energy than that.
Fig 4 in this paper shows a nice peak at the Z mass.
mfb
#3
Jan29-13, 11:08 AM
Mentor
P: 11,631
It highlights the fact that the photon is virtual (and therefore off-shell).

Is there a well-defined point in the energy of the mediator when it's a Z instead of a gamma-star?
Both are possible, and their relative contribution depends on the energy of the process.

With a W, you need ##q \bar{q'}## (one up-type and one down-type quark). I don't know how this process is called.

JoePhysicsNut
#4
Jan29-13, 04:57 PM
P: 34
Drell Yan process

Quote Quote by mfb View Post
It highlights the fact that the photon is virtual (and therefore off-shell).
Thank you for your replies!

For massive particles, a real particle is one which lies on mass shell i.e. E^2-p^2*c^2=m^2*c^4. For a virtual particle the equals sign doesn't apply and one can get different values for m other than the true value of m.

However, a photon is massless, so what does it mean for a photon to be off-shell?
mfb
#5
Jan29-13, 05:00 PM
Mentor
P: 11,631
##E \neq p## (or ##E\neq pc## if you don't like c=1) - something which is satisfied for real photons.

Real Photons have the same equation like massive particles, they just have m=0 there.
Hepth
#6
Jan29-13, 05:47 PM
PF Gold
Hepth's Avatar
P: 466
Quote Quote by JoePhysicsNut View Post
Thank you for your replies!

For massive particles, a real particle is one which lies on mass shell i.e. E^2-p^2*c^2=m^2*c^4. For a virtual particle the equals sign doesn't apply and one can get different values for m other than the true value of m.

However, a photon is massless, so what does it mean for a photon to be off-shell?
It also means that for a photon with 4-momentum K, K^2 is NOT 0 as it would be if "on shell".
andrien
#7
Jan30-13, 12:08 AM
P: 1,020
If a W acts as the mediator, is it still classified as Drell Yan?
it can not be,can you see why.
Bill_K
#8
Jan30-13, 04:56 AM
Sci Advisor
Thanks
Bill_K's Avatar
P: 4,160
If a W acts as the mediator, is it still classified as Drell Yan?
it can not be,can you see why.
This talk on the observation of Drell-Yan processes at the LHC includes in the discussion those in which W is the intermediate particle. Other references use the term "Drell-Yan-like."

EDIT: Especially see the third slide, "The Drell-Yan processes", in which the diagram given has an intermediate W.
andrien
#9
Jan30-13, 07:56 AM
P: 1,020
So a u quark and d(bar) quark annihilate each other.
Vanadium 50
#10
Jan30-13, 10:35 AM
Mentor
Vanadium 50's Avatar
P: 16,204
Technically, Drell-Yan is only virtual photon exchange. However, especially at high mass, it is indistinguishable from Z exchange, so that is often included. The LHC experiments, by analogy, have called q-qbar annihilation through a virtual W "Drell-Yan", but it is strictly speaking not correct.
jtbell
#11
Jan30-13, 10:46 AM
Mentor
jtbell's Avatar
P: 11,632
I see from Wikipedia that Drell and Yan described this process in 1970. Electroweak theory (including the Z and W) was just getting off the ground at that time, so it seems natural that (a) they considered only photons, and (b) people later tended to generalize to similar processes involving the other gauge bosons.


Register to reply

Related Discussions
Drell Yan process and divergencies High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics 0
Bjorken's and Drell's classics. Science & Math Textbooks 1
Drell-Yan at LHC High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics 2
Proof that a stochastic process isn't a Markov Process Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics 4