## Definition of the boundary map for chain complexes

I've been poking around, learning a little about homology theory. I had a question about the boundary operator. Namely, how it's defined.

There's two definitions I've seen floating around. The first is at:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Simplicial_homology

The second, at

http://www.math.wsu.edu/faculty/bkri...4_03062012.pdf

The only difference seems to be the inclusion of a factor of (-1)i inside the sums.

My guess is that the extra factor doesn't matter, since there is some choice in how you construct chain. In other words, the fact that you're working with a FREE abelian group over the p-simplexes of your complex, flipping the signs results in an isomorphic group.

(If that's not the case, my other guess would be that the latter only works in Z/2Z, where sign doesn't matter anyway).

Is my reasoning sound? Or am I missing something?

 PhysOrg.com science news on PhysOrg.com >> 'Whodunnit' of Irish potato famine solved>> The mammoth's lament: Study shows how cosmic impact sparked devastating climate change>> Curiosity Mars rover drills second rock target
 Recognitions: Science Advisor With Z2 coefficients signs don't matter since minus 1 and one are the same. The Wikipedia definition of boundary is correct in general. You can check this with examples.
 Ah. Thank you. Now that I think about it, you can' "choose" what group you want the coefficients to be in if your generating your groups freely anyway. (I'm guessing that would be some quotient of the free group, determined by the type of coefficient you're interested in, but I'll worry about that later).

Recognitions: