Thoughts on a non-linear second order problem


by Someone2841
Tags: nonlinear, order
Someone2841
Someone2841 is offline
#1
Feb12-13, 05:59 PM
P: 29
[itex]h''(t)=-\frac{1}{h(t)^2}, h(0) = h_0, h'(0)=v_0[/itex]

The first step is to, I think, reduce this to a fist-order problem:

[itex]h'(t)h''(t)=-h'(t)\frac{1}{h(t)^2}[/itex] --- Multiply both sides by h'(t)
[itex]h'(t)^2=\frac{1}{h(t)}+c_1[/itex] --- Integrate both sides
[itex]1/h'(t) = \sqrt{\frac{h(t)}{c_1 h(t)+1}}[/itex] --- Rearrange

I haven't seen this explained anywhere, but I'm fairly certain that for f = f(x), [itex]\int \frac{1}{f'}df = x + c[/itex] (could someone outline a proof/disproof for this? Please no ad verecundiam.) Therefore, integrating both sides with respect to h(t) gets a messy explicit formula for t(h):

[itex]t(h) = \int \sqrt{\frac{h}{c_1 h+1}} dh[/itex]

I am looking for a non-recursive, explicit formula for h(t). Any ideas? Is there a better approach than this one?

Thanks in advance!


P.S., here's my thought process for [itex]\int \frac{1}{f'}df = x + C[/itex]:

[itex]\frac{dx}{dy} = \frac{1}{\frac{dx}{dy}}[/itex]
[itex]\int \frac{1}{\frac{dx}{dy}} dy = \int 1 dx = x + C[/itex]

Even if this isn't valid, is it true?
Phys.Org News Partner Science news on Phys.org
SensaBubble: It's a bubble, but not as we know it (w/ video)
The hemihelix: Scientists discover a new shape using rubber bands (w/ video)
Microbes provide insights into evolution of human language

Register to reply

Related Discussions
2nd Order Linear ODE Problem Calculus & Beyond Homework 3
First-Order Linear Differential Problem Calculus & Beyond Homework 5
A problem about reduction of the order of a linear ODE Calculus & Beyond Homework 5
first order, non linear ode problem Calculus & Beyond Homework 15
Linear First order ODE problem Calculus & Beyond Homework 2