Eyepiece for refractor telescope


by PhysicoRaj
Tags: eyepiece, refractor, telescope
PhysicoRaj
PhysicoRaj is offline
#1
Feb13-13, 11:06 PM
PhysicoRaj's Avatar
P: 285
Hi, Iam thinking of making my own telescope and I have a magnifying glass lens, biconvex, about 10 cm in diameter and 27 cm focal length. I think it would be better as the objective. For the eyepiece, what type of lens, of what focal length and aperture diameter should I use? (I hope to identify the rings of Saturn.... I may not be able to .. but at least the craters of the moon are okay.)
Thanks.
Phys.Org News Partner Astronomy news on Phys.org
Quest for extraterrestrial life not over, experts say
Continents may be a key feature of Super-Earths
Astronomers discover first self-lensing binary star system
russ_watters
russ_watters is offline
#2
Feb13-13, 11:15 PM
Mentor
P: 21,999
The rings of Saturn are a piece of cake, but with that short focal length, you'll need a short focal length eyepiece and maybe a Barlow.
PhysicoRaj
PhysicoRaj is offline
#3
Feb13-13, 11:49 PM
PhysicoRaj's Avatar
P: 285
Then what type of a configuration you suggest(focal length combination and size)? May be I will try to get both new, the eyepiece and the objective.

Andy Resnick
Andy Resnick is offline
#4
Feb14-13, 08:24 AM
Sci Advisor
P: 5,468

Eyepiece for refractor telescope


Quote Quote by PhysicoRaj View Post
Hi, Iam thinking of making my own telescope and I have a magnifying glass lens, biconvex, about 10 cm in diameter and 27 cm focal length. I think it would be better as the objective. For the eyepiece, what type of lens, of what focal length and aperture diameter should I use? (I hope to identify the rings of Saturn.... I may not be able to .. but at least the craters of the moon are okay.)
Thanks.
The ratio of the objective and eyepiece focal lengths provides the (angular) magnification, so the shorter the focal length of the eyepiece, the greater the magnification. Using a negative (concave) lens for the eyepiece is worse than a positive lens when you are trying to look through the telescope (see Galilean vs. Keplerian telescopes).

http://depts.washington.edu/hssexec/...s_galileo.html

The f/# of your objective is 2.7, so the f-number of your eyepiece does not need to be much larger than 2.7 as well.

This simple analysis completely ignores aberrations, which are likely to be large.
glappkaeft
glappkaeft is offline
#5
Feb14-13, 08:30 AM
P: 82
A common simple refractor design is a 100 mm doublett lens with a focal length of 1000 mm. For maximum FoV you'd need a 50 mm eyepice. Together with a 2xbarlow lens and a second eyepiece around 12 mm. This way you'd get magnifications of 20, 40, 83 and 167.

I'd recommend that you start by getting your hands on a book on building telescopes and checking if there is an amateur astronomer club nearby. There are a lot of gotchas if you haven't built a telescope before.
PhysicoRaj
PhysicoRaj is offline
#6
Feb14-13, 09:32 AM
PhysicoRaj's Avatar
P: 285
Thanks a lot...


Register to reply

Related Discussions
focal length eyepiece for telescope Introductory Physics Homework 16
amateur telescope eyepiece filters General Astronomy 4
A simple refractor homemade telescope General Astronomy 6
Question on Refractor Telescope ! General Astronomy 6
Refractor Telescopes General Astronomy 8