| New Reply |
Dipole interaction |
Share Thread | Thread Tools |
| Feb25-13, 01:02 PM | #1 |
|
|
Dipole interaction
1. The problem statement, all variables and given/known data
See attachment 2. Relevant equations 3. The attempt at a solution Thus far I believe I am supposed to use calculate the interaction with kQq/Δr? I have tried summing over interactions so that 1/4∏ε*[(-Q)(-q)/(r-d/2+D/2) + (-Q)(q)/(r+d/2+D/2) + (Q)(-q)/(r-d/2-D/2) + (Q)(q)/(r+d/2-D/2)] , but this doesn't work, could someone point me in the right direction. |
| Feb25-13, 05:05 PM | #2 |
|
Mentor
|
With taylor series for those factors of 1/(r+d/2) and similar (and assuming d/2 << r), you should get the correct result.
|
| Feb25-13, 06:23 PM | #3 |
|
|
|
| Feb26-13, 07:10 AM | #4 |
|
Mentor
|
Dipole interaction
This is correct.
And right, you do not get "exactly" 1/(r+d/2), but you get similar expressions. |
| Feb26-13, 11:51 AM | #5 |
|
|
Ok thanks for the help, I can't seem to figure out what point i'm supposed to be taylor expanding about? For instance for the interaction between -Q and -q, 1/4∏ε*[(-Q)(-q)/(r-d/2+D/2)] take r = 1/(r-d/2+D/2) and that r >> D & d, d/2 vanish & D/2 vanish? Then I am just left with 1/r, bit confused, even if i try to expand that without making the approximation mentioned I still am not quite sure about what point I am expanding about.
|
| Feb26-13, 12:32 PM | #6 |
|
Mentor
|
The difference between 1/r and your terms is the point of the expansion.
$$\frac{1}{r+x} = \frac{1}{r} \cdot \frac{1}{1+\frac{x}{r}} \approx \frac{1}{r} (1 \pm \dots)$$ |
| Feb26-13, 12:55 PM | #7 |
|
|
|
| Feb26-13, 01:04 PM | #8 |
|
Mentor
|
That is the point where you develop your taylor expansion. It depends on the definition of the f you choose, but I would expect 1 there.
|
| Feb26-13, 01:38 PM | #9 |
|
|
|
| Feb26-13, 02:46 PM | #10 |
|
|
You're expanding about x/r = 0. To be a bit more explicit, the function you're expanding is ##f(z) = \frac{1}{1-z}## about ##z=0## and then plugging in ##z=x/r##.
|
| Feb26-13, 02:47 PM | #11 |
|
|
|
| Feb26-13, 03:15 PM | #12 |
|
|
|
| Feb26-13, 03:19 PM | #13 |
|
|
Nope, that's fine. If you look at the result you're trying to arrive at, you should notice it has r3 on the bottom, so you want the 1/r and 1/r2 terms to cancel out.
|
| Feb26-13, 03:22 PM | #14 |
|
|
|
| New Reply |
| Thread Tools | |
Similar Threads for: Dipole interaction
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | ||
| Why is there no constant magnetic dipole-dipole interaction? | Quantum Physics | 4 | ||
| Dipole-Induced Dipole Interaction | Advanced Physics Homework | 6 | ||
| Dipole-dipole interaction | Classical Physics | 6 | ||
| Nuclear magnetic resonance dipole dipole interaction | Quantum Physics | 0 | ||
| Derivation of dipole-dipole interaction energy | Advanced Physics Homework | 2 | ||