Understanding the Limit of Recursive Sequence R_n for x = k^2 - k + 1

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter bomba923
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Root Sequence
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the limit of a recursive sequence defined as R_n = x + √(x - √(R_{n - 2})) with R_0 = x = k^2 - k + 1, where k is a natural number greater than 1. Participants explore the behavior of this sequence as n approaches infinity, considering both the original formulation and a redefined version of the sequence.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants question why the limit of the sequence R_n approaches k^2 as n approaches infinity, suggesting that setting R_n = R_{n-2} could provide a pathway to solve for the limit.
  • Others propose redefining the sequence to R_n = √(x + √(x - √(R_{n - 2}))) and explore how this affects the limit, suggesting it converges to (1 + √(4x - 3))/2.
  • There is a discussion about the conditions under which the limits are derived, with some participants noting the importance of starting values R_0 and R_1 and their respective intervals for convergence.
  • One participant expresses confusion about how to derive the limit of (1 + √(4x - 3))/2, particularly in relation to the presence of the number 3 in the expression.
  • Another participant points out that the original sequence may differ from a simpler nested radical limit, which could be causing confusion in understanding the limit behavior.
  • A participant shares their computational results from Mathematica, indicating a discrepancy between their findings and the proposed limit, prompting requests for clarification on their interpretation of the recursive relation.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the limit of the sequence, with multiple competing views on how to derive it and what the correct limit should be. There is ongoing debate about the implications of different formulations of the sequence.

Contextual Notes

Some participants note that the convergence behavior may depend on the specific starting values and the definitions used in the recursive relation, highlighting potential limitations in the assumptions made during the discussion.

bomba923
Messages
759
Reaction score
0
Short root sequence question

For the recursive sequence
[tex]R_n = x + \sqrt {x - \sqrt {R_{n - 2} } }[/tex]
[tex]R_0 = x = k^2 - k + 1[/tex]

[tex]\forall k \in \mathbb{N},\;k > 1[/tex] why does [tex]\mathop {\lim }\limits_{n \to \infty } R_n = k^2[/tex] ??
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Perhaps if I redefine the whole problem and open it to the reals ([tex]\mathbb{R}[/tex]),
it will become clearer and easier to solve :smile: .

First off, the sequence shall be defined recursively as
[tex]R_n = \sqrt {x + \sqrt {x - \sqrt {R_{n - 2} } } }[/tex]
(just takin' the root of what's in my original post! (It's a root sequence anyway))

So:
If we start with [tex]R_0[/tex], we will follow with [tex]\left\{ {R_2 ,R_4 , \ldots ,R_n } \right\}[/tex]
If we start with [tex]R_1[/tex], we will follow with [tex]\left\{ {R_3 ,R_5 , \ldots ,R_n } \right\}[/tex]

Such that:
[tex]R_0 \in \left\{ {x|x > \sqrt {x + \sqrt {x - \sqrt x } } > 1 ,x \in \mathbb{R}} \right\}[/tex] (numerically, x > 1.311 for [tex]R_0[/tex])
[tex]R_1 \in \left\{ {x|x > \sqrt {x + \sqrt x } > 1 ,x \in \mathbb{R}} \right\}[/tex] (numerically, x > 1.755 for [tex]R_1[/tex])

We will find that:
[tex]\mathop {\lim }\limits_{n \to \infty } R_n = \frac{{1 + \sqrt {4x - 3} }}{2}[/tex]
(doesn't matter which [tex]R_0[/tex] or [tex]R_1[/tex] you choose...
just as long as it's inside the appropriate interval!:biggrin:)
------------------------------------------------------------------
Now, why exactly does:
[tex]\mathop {\lim }\limits_{n \to \infty } R_n = \frac{{1 + \sqrt {4x - 3} }}{2}[/tex] ?
 
Last edited:
bomba923 said:
For the recursive sequence
[tex]R_n = x + \sqrt {x - \sqrt {R_{n - 2} } }[/tex]
[tex]R_0 = x = k^2 - k + 1[/tex]

[tex]\forall k \in \mathbb{N},\;k > 1[/tex] why does [tex]\mathop {\lim }\limits_{n \to \infty } R_n = k^2[/tex] ??

If the limit exists, you should just be able to set [tex]R_n=R_{n-2}[/tex] and solve. This gives

[tex]((R-k^2+k-1)^2-k^2+k-1)^2-R=0[/tex]

which has solutions

[tex](R-k^2)(R-(k^2-2k+1))(R^2+(-2k^2+2k-3)R+(k^4-2k^3+3k^2-2k+1))[/tex]

Why this is defined for all [tex]k\in\mathbb{Z}^+[/tex] and why it has the one particular solution out of the four possible ones I don't know offhand.
 
[tex] \lim_{n \rightarrow \infty} R_n =<br /> \lim_{n \rightarrow \infty} \sqrt{x + \sqrt{x - \sqrt{R_{n-2}}} }<br /> = \sqrt{ \lim_{n \rightarrow \infty}x + \sqrt{x - \sqrt{R_{n-2}}} }<br /> = \cdots[/tex]
 
Hurkyl said:
[tex] \lim_{n \rightarrow \infty} R_n =<br /> \lim_{n \rightarrow \infty} \sqrt{x + \sqrt{x - \sqrt{R_{n-2}}} }<br /> = \sqrt{ \lim_{n \rightarrow \infty}x + \sqrt{x - \sqrt{R_{n-2}}} }<br /> = \cdots[/tex]

But how does that simplify [tex]\mathop {\lim }\limits_{n \to \infty } R_n[/tex] down to '"[tex]\frac{{1 + \sqrt {4x - 3} }}{2}[/tex]"' ?
 
Last edited:
Continue through the dots. :-p It might help you visualize to use L to denote [itex]\lim_{x \rightarrow \infty} R_n[/itex].
 
Oh--ic now
!
 
You mind explaining this a little further?

I realize the limit of an infinitely nested radical:

[tex]\sqrt{x+\sqrt{x+\sqrt{x+...}}}[/tex]

is:

[tex]\frac{1+\sqrt{1+4x}}{2}[/tex]

but don't see how to get the 3 in there.
 
Last edited:
I think your problem is that you're considering a different sequence. :smile:
 
  • #10
saltydog said:
You mind explaining this a little further?

I realize the limit of an infinitely nested radical:

[tex]\sqrt{x+\sqrt{x+\sqrt{x+...}}}[/tex]

is:

[tex]\frac{1+\sqrt{1+4x}}{2}[/tex]

but don't see how to get the 3 in there.

My sequence alternates the signs of the square roots as I embed them, as
[tex]\sqrt{x+\sqrt{x-\sqrt{x+...}}}[/tex]
 
  • #11
Hello Bomba. Thanks for responding, you too Hurkyl. I know you're just telling me the minimum for my own good but you know what, I couldn't even get past the definition and I'd like to understand it. This is what I have:

If I start from [itex]R_0[/itex] and you say calculate R2, R4, R6,. . ., and the recursion relation is always in reference to R(n-2), then it's just like doing it for each N and set up the relation for R(n-1). Is that not correct? That is, if I start with [itex]R_0[/itex], then it seems to me, just ignore the odd members in the sequence. Perhaps that is not correct though. When I experiment with it though in Mathematica, say for R0=1.9, it doesn't seem to converge to the value you specify. This is how I set it up in Mathematica. Perhaps you can correct my interpretation:

[tex]f[x,xm1]=\sqrt{x+\sqrt{x-\sqrt{xm1}}}[/tex];

[tex]xstart=1.9[/tex]

[tex]ntotal=alargenumber[/tex]

[tex]valist=Table[{0},{ntotal}][/tex]

[tex]valist[[1]]=f[xstart,xstart][/tex]

[tex]For[n=2,n<ntotal,n++,[/tex]<br /> <br /> [tex]valist[[n]]=f[xstart,valist[[n-1]]];[/tex]<br /> <br /> When I do that, it seems to converge to 1.639 . . .<br /> <br /> But:<br /> <br /> [tex]\frac{1+\sqrt{4xstart-3}}{2}=1.572...[/tex]<br /> <br /> Would you (or Hurkyl or anyone else) tell me where my problem is?<br /> <br /> Thanks,<br /> Salty<br /> <br /> Edit: corrected to reflect relation of even members in terms of R0[/tex]
 
Last edited:
  • #12
Hrm. The problem is that I had assumed that what was posted as "the answer" was correct. 1.639... is, in fact, the correct limit. (Assuming that my calculuator is sufficiently smart and would tell me if there were additional real solutions to the fixed point equation)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K