| Thread Closed |
Why no beta-stable isotopes at N=19,21..? |
Share Thread | Thread Tools |
| Jul12-05, 10:32 PM | #1 |
|
|
Why no beta-stable isotopes at N=19,21..?
Hello to all,
I am new to this forum. I am webmaster for the Nucleon Cluster Model of the atomic nucleus of the late nuclear physicist Ronald Brightsen (MIT, 1950). You may view the site at this link: http://www.brightsenmodel.phoenixrising-web.net In his papers Mr. Brightsen asked the following question: Why are no beta-stable isotopes found at neutron numbers N = 19,21,35,39,45,61,71,89,112,123,147. Do any current "models" of nuclear physics provide an answer ? Thanks for any help you can provide. |
| PhysOrg.com |
physics news on PhysOrg.com >> Promising doped zirconia >> New X-ray method shows how frog embryos could help thwart disease >> Bringing life into focus |
| Thread Closed |
| Thread Tools | |
Similar Threads for: Why no beta-stable isotopes at N=19,21..?
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | ||
| Are there fissionable isotopes of any element with short-lived radioactive isotopes? | Nuclear Engineering | 48 | ||
| Isotopes | Biology, Chemistry & Other Homework | 3 | ||
| Isotopes | Chemistry | 20 | ||
| isotopes and radioisotopes | General Physics | 1 | ||
| Do isotopes lie? | Earth | 0 | ||