Big trouble coming from Siberia

  • Thread starter Thread starter ludi_srbin
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the implications of thawing permafrost in Siberia, particularly concerning the release of methane as a greenhouse gas and its potential impact on global warming. Participants explore various aspects of this phenomenon, including extraction possibilities, historical climate data, and differing interpretations of the environmental risks involved.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants express concern that thawing permafrost could release significant amounts of methane, a potent greenhouse gas.
  • Others question the feasibility of extracting methane from the frozen surface, suggesting that the distribution of methane may vary and that large-scale extraction may not be practical.
  • One participant highlights the historical context of permafrost formation, noting that it developed after the last ice age and questioning the narrative surrounding climate change and its implications.
  • Some participants argue that claims of a looming environmental disaster are exaggerated, citing historical temperature data that suggest previous warmer periods in the region.
  • There is a suggestion that Russia might find economic value in extracting methane, despite potential environmental concerns.
  • Another viewpoint emphasizes that methane's greenhouse effect may be less significant than often portrayed, arguing for a more nuanced understanding of its impact.
  • A participant references a scientist's dismissal of the panic surrounding permafrost thawing, asserting that not all permafrost will melt and that claims of rapid thawing are overstated.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus; multiple competing views remain regarding the implications of thawing permafrost, the validity of climate data interpretations, and the potential for methane extraction.

Contextual Notes

Participants reference various historical temperature trends and data, but there are unresolved questions about the accuracy and interpretation of these data sets. The discussion reflects differing assumptions about the environmental consequences of methane release and the stability of permafrost.

ludi_srbin
Messages
137
Reaction score
0
Warming hits 'tipping point'

Siberia feels the heat It's a frozen peat bog the size of France and Germany combined, contains billions of tonnes of greenhouse gas and, for the first time since the ice age, it is melting

Ian Sample, science correspondent
Thursday August 11, 2005
The Guardian

A vast expanse of western Siberia is undergoing an unprecedented thaw that could dramatically increase the rate of global warming, climate scientists warn today.

Researchers who have recently returned from the region found that an area of permafrost spanning a million square kilometers - the size of France and Germany combined - has started to melt for the first time since it formed 11,000 years ago at the end of the last ice age.

Article continues
The area, which covers the entire sub-Arctic region of western Siberia, is the world's largest frozen peat bog and scientists fear that as it thaws, it will release billions of tonnes of methane, a greenhouse gas 20 times more potent than carbon dioxide, into the atmosphere.

It is a scenario climate scientists have feared since first identifying „tipping points” - delicate thresholds where a slight rise in the Earth's temperature can cause a dramatic change in the environment that itself triggers a far greater increase in global temperatures.

The discovery was made by Sergei Kirpotin at Tomsk State University in western Siberia and Judith Marquand at Oxford University and is reported in New Scientist today.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/climatechange/story/0,12374,1546824,00.html

 
Earth sciences news on Phys.org
Thanks for posting this. Methane seems to be such a large problem, be it in the sea or land.
 
Can it be extracted? The surface is frozen, not the methane, so couldn't you start making holes everywhere and catching what comes out?
 
rachmaninoff said:
Can it be extracted? The surface is frozen, not the methane, so couldn't you start making holes everywhere and catching what comes out?

Probalby not on the scale that you would need to prevent any decent amount of damage. Of course who knows how it is 'entombed' so to say. Is it just scattered around or are they in large pockets...
 
Isn’t it curious that the permafrost formed AFTER the ice age, in that area whilst herds of large grazers, (horses, aurochs, etc oh yes also mammoths) were flourishing on the large steppes DURING the ice age? It never stops to surprise me that nobody seems to find that strange and everybody seems to understand how the ice ages tells us about the runaway climate conditions, about which this article so lavishly scaremongers

Check this out:

http://sciborg.uwaterloo.ca/~twdedwar/reprints-pdf/2000-qr-macdonald.pdf

MacDonald et al (2000) Holocene Treeline History and Climate Change Across Northern Eurasia
Quaternary Research 53, 302–311

Boreal forest development in this region commenced by 10,000 yr B.P. Over most of Russia, forest advanced to or near the current arctic coastline between 9000 and 7000 yr B.P. and retreated to its present position by between 4000 and 3000 yr B.P.

For the record, 10,000 carbon years is about 11.500 calendar year, the species under investigation are Larix, Betula (birch) and Picea (Christmas tree). Do those grow on permafrost? This makes me wondering how “perma” the permafrost is.

3 degrees temp increase in west Russia?

http://data.giss.nasa.gov/gistemp/station_data/

Scroll down and click on the map to find weather stations in West Russia, follow the links to download data and play a little with Excel to find the following trends for the last 40 years (1965 – 2005)

Moscow 0.039 degrees per year or 1.6 degrees in 40 years
St Petersburg: 1.9 degrees in 40 years

Now the rural stations in the area in between Moscow and St Peterburg to the North warming in degrees C in 40 years:

Junsuu: 1.80

Reboly: 1.48

Vytegra: 1.97

Vologda: 0.83

Archangelsk: 1.41

So where is the 3 degrees? This is well over 50% exaggeration and this is an very good example how the slippery slope of the global warming myth works.

Incidentely, suppose that we were curious for the trend of Archangelsk for the whole record as of 1881 we find 0.075 degrees per decade. But if we were curious for the last say 68 years, we would find a cooling of 0.022! Why? Start point bias, starting with the hottest year on record 1937. See how you can manipulate data. And for that article: unfounded scaremongering. There may be some permafrost thawing but runaway things is gibberish.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
But even if they couldn't get all of the methane, youd think that Russia would want to acquire it for industry, they obviously have one of the largest concentrations of this hydrocarbon then anywhere else in the world. It seems to me that it would be economically plausible, even if it doesn't stop the environmental disaster. And any little bit extracted would probably help.
 
Probably not that easy to extract the clathrate from the sediment. Don't expect concentrations over 5%. You need a lot of frozen soil to process.

But perhaps its more important to understand that nothing is pointing towards an environmental disaster. First of all the particular area has been much warmer in the 1940ies, around the turn of the century 1000BC and especially during the Hypsithermal 4-9000 years ago. Furthermore methane is a much weaker greenhouse gas as CO2 and saturation of it's effect will occur much earlier. Moreover it's unstable and will oxidize in some decade.
 
Anyway, the real problem with this kind of article is the need for the state of fear.

Here is the real story:

http://en.rian.ru/analysis/20050822/41201605.html

...
Academician Vladimir Melnikov spoke to RIA Novosti about the problem. Melnikov is the director of the world's only Institute of the Earth's Cryosphere. The Russian Academy of Sciences' Institute is located in the Siberian city of Tyumen and investigates the ways in which ground water becomes ice and permafrost.

"This is just another scare story, this time about the Siberian swamps." This was Melnikov's first reaction when asked by RIA Novosti to comment on claims by The Daily Telegraph that thawing Siberian permafrost could cause an ecological crisis.

...

. There is simply no way that all the permafrost will melt," the scientist said.

He also refuted claims that the swamps are rapidly thawing and forming small lakes. etc.
 
ok, thanks for the link, I haven't heard of the issue until now, I was just stating what seemed like a good idea with the information I had.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
8K
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 99 ·
4
Replies
99
Views
37K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K