MaxS
- 38
- 0
The discussion revolves around the concept of trigonometry without the traditional functions of sine, cosine, and tangent, as proposed by Dr. Norman Wildberger. Participants explore the implications of this approach, its validity, and its comparison to classical trigonometry.
Participants generally disagree on the validity and novelty of the proposed trigonometric approach, with multiple competing views regarding its implications and correctness.
Some participants note that the discussion lacks clarity on the definitions and assumptions underlying the new approach, which may affect its acceptance.
How sneeky of him to sneek in sine, cosine, tanjent and not referencing them in his concept :DI just saw that. Here is a pdf explaining the technique:
http://web.maths.unsw.edu.au.nyud.n...rs/Chapter1.pdf
What irks me most is this quote. "Classical trigonometry" has been thoroughly proven correct, and he acts like it is wrong. What he's done is not a new thing: he's just using a few changes of variables.Once you learn the five main rules of rational trigonometry and how to simply apply them, you realize that classical trigonometry represents a misunderstanding of geometry.
I stand corrected; I should have called it "silly" instead.Hurkyl said:To be fair, the mathematics is not nonsense: it's the suggestions that this is a new thing, and that it's clearly superior to classical trigonometry.
Mathematics students have cause to celebrate. A University of New South Wales academic, Dr Norman Wildberger, has rewritten the arcane rules of trigonometry and eliminated sines, cosines and tangents from the trigonometric toolkit.