def'n of Limit Point? and limit.

calvino

I know that there are different definitions for a limit point .

"A number such that for all , there exists a member of the set different from such that .

The topological definition of limit point of is that is a point such that every open set around it contains at least one point of different from ."-MATHWORLD

Are they all equivalent, when defining "the limit of f"? Or, this may help too, does my definition of a limit sound correct?...(bold-faced variables are vectors)

Let f: U->R^n
Let a be an element of the reals such that for all delta' >0 there exists an x in U, different than a, such that ||x-a||<delta'.
We say that lim f(x)=L as x->a, if for every epsilon>0 there exists a delta''>0 so that if ||x-a||<delta'' then ||f(x)-L||<epsilon.

Also, Is it right that I used delta' and delta"?

calvino

Is it necessary that I write U to be an open set?

DeadWolfe

Limit point in this sense is not the same thing at all as the limit of a function as it aproaches a point.

They are two different things.

calvino

i know that, but you DO need to define a limit point in order to define the limit. It would really help if you could please look at my definition of a limit.

DeadWolfe

To be honest, I'm not sure I understand the question.

hypermorphism

In set form, the definition then reads that for every open set U about a in R, there exists an open set V in Rⁿ about L that contains f(U), the image of U under f.
If D is the domain of f, then we see that L is a limit point of f(D).

HallsofIvy

Except for one small point, since x and a are real numbers you mean |x-a|, not ||x-a||, Your definition of limit is correct. You really have 2 definitions:

"Let a be an element of the reals such that for all delta' >0 there exists an x in U, different than a, such that ||x-a||<delta'."
is saying that a is a limit point of the set (of real numbers) U.

"We say that lim f(x)=L as x->a, if for every epsilon>0 there exists a delta''>0 so that if ||x-a||<delta'' then ||f(x)-L||<epsilon."
is the definition of limit of the function (which only exists a a limit point of U).

No, U does not have to be an open set. Although in that case a would be member of U.

If you keep ||x-a|| then U can be a subset of any R[sup]m[/tex].

In fact, if you use a ||x-a|| to represent a general metric (distance) function, the definitions are correct for a function between any two metric spaces.

If you replace "||x-a||< delta" with "there exist an element of U in every open set containing a". Then your definitions work in any topological space.