New View Of The Universe


by hawaiidude
Tags: universe, view
hawaiidude
hawaiidude is offline
#1
Oct9-03, 09:55 PM
P: 45
Hey check this out



http://us.rd.yahoo.com/dailynews/fc/..._universe_dc_2

What do you think?
Phys.Org News Partner Astronomy news on Phys.org
Astronomers: 'Tilt-a-worlds' could harbor life
Pushy neighbors force stellar twins to diverge
Image: Multiple protostars within IRAS 20324+4057
quartodeciman
quartodeciman is offline
#2
Oct10-03, 01:14 AM
P: 383
Just wait until next month and it will be a hotdog (or something else).

:)
hawaiidude
hawaiidude is offline
#3
Oct10-03, 04:28 AM
P: 45
lol

Phobos
Phobos is offline
#4
Oct10-03, 11:21 AM
Emeritus
Sci Advisor
PF Gold
P: 2,018

New View Of The Universe


more here...
http://www.newscientist.com/news/news.jsp?id=ns99994250
Labguy
Labguy is offline
#5
Oct10-03, 12:55 PM
Sci Advisor
Labguy's Avatar
P: 734
From the article:
"Spergel and his team are now working with Weeks to see if they might somehow have missed the circles. And there is a further test of the dodecahedron model. It predicts that a key measure of the density of matter in the Universe, which governs its curvature, is equal to 1.013.

Completely flat space corresponds to 1, while values greater than or less than 1 would create a curved Universe. Observations of the microwave background radiation so far suggest the value lies somewhere between 1.00 and 1.04. Further observations by WMAP and other instruments should give a more accurate answer within the next few months."

From this, and other observations, I'll go with Weeks and not Spergel. I just don't buy the "six matching circles" requirement.
Eh
Eh is offline
#6
Oct11-03, 12:05 PM
P: 683
This has some implications for other cosmological models. If this finite model is correct, then several others are ruled. An eternal, inflationary universe is in the toilet, and the brane collision model also comes to mind.
hawaiidude
hawaiidude is offline
#7
Oct11-03, 01:58 PM
P: 45
how did they figure this out? radio signal?
wolram
wolram is offline
#8
Oct11-03, 02:12 PM
PF Gold
wolram's Avatar
P: 3,669
as i understand the the universe would have to have
2/3 more mass to be "closed", do these observations
override predicted criticle mass?
Eh
Eh is offline
#9
Oct11-03, 03:03 PM
P: 683
WMAP findings among others suggest omega is close to 1. However, the observable matter in the universe is only a third of that number. Hence the notion of matter that does not produce EM radiation.
Jug
#10
Oct30-03, 05:06 PM
P: n/a
>>....value lies somewhere between 1.00 and 1.04.>>

I suspect it will be shown as closer to 1.0535. And another thought....how to configure a finite universe by an infinite pi value?


Register to reply

Related Discussions
Doughnut-shaped Universe: Astronomers say Universe is small and finite Cosmology 5
If the observable universe were the entire universe, would the mass make it expand? Cosmology 7
Origin of the Universe: Created Universe vs Cyclical Universe General Astronomy 9