Solving Hard Limits: Find the Limits or Say Why They Don't Exist

In summary: What you are forgetting to do is cancel the factors from the numerator and the denominator...once you cancel an (x-2) , the limits are no longer undefined... so cancel it in both cases, and compare the 2 answers, and if they are the same, the limit existsAre we allowed to cancel out?We haven't studied L'Hôpital's rule but I don't know what to do with that one
  • #1
powerless
26
0
I started learning limits and I have some difficulties qith this question;
Find the limits or say why they do not exist.

a)[tex]lim_{x\rightarrow2}\frac{\left|x^2 + x -6\right|}{x-2}[/tex]

b) [tex]lim_{x\rightarrow0}\frac{\sqrt{4-x}-2}{\sqrt{x+1}-1}[/tex]




3. The Attempt at a Solution

a)we have an absolute value on the numerator but we can factorise it:
[tex]lim_{x\rightarrow2}\frac{\left|x^2 + x -6\right|}{x-2}[/tex]
[tex]lim_{x\rightarrow2}\frac{(x-2)(x+3)}{x-2}[/tex]

Now we have two cases:

(x approaching 2 from the positive side)
[tex]lim_{x\rightarrow2+}\frac{(x-2)(x+3)}{x-2}[/tex]

[tex]lim_{x\rightarrow2+}\frac{(2-2)(2+3)}{2-2}[/tex] = undefined (?)

(x approaching 2 from the negative side)
[tex]lim_{x\rightarrow2-}\frac{(-x+2)(x+3)}{x-2}[/tex]

[tex]lim_{x\rightarrow2-}\frac{(-2+2)(2+3)}{2-2}[/tex] = undefined

Why do I always get devision by zero and undefined, did I do somethin wrong?


b) [tex]lim_{x\rightarrow0}\frac{\sqrt{4-x}-2}{\sqrt{x+1}-1}[/tex]

Because we have a sqrt on the denominator we mulitply top & bottom by the conjugate and we rationalize the denominator,

[tex]lim_{x\rightarrow0}\frac{(\sqrt{4-x}-2)(\sqrt{x+1}+1)}{(\sqrt{x+1}-1)\sqrt{x+1}+1)}[/tex]

The denominator expands and simplifies to:

[tex]lim_{x\rightarrow0}\frac{(\sqrt{4-x}-2)(\sqrt{x+1}+1)}{x+1-1}[/tex]

What can i do next? should I expand the numerator too? ( it would become
[tex]\sqrt{4-x.x+1}+\sqrt{4-x}-2\sqrt{x+1}-2[/tex])
But I don't know how to do this one.

 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
1st question :
you are right to split the limit into 2 cases
it's easier if in the second case you factor out the -1from the brackets and keep the factors the same as in the first case (x-2)
What you are forgetting to do is cancel the factors from the numerator and the denominator...once you cancel an (x-2) , the limits are no longer undefined... so cancel it in both cases, and compare the 2 answers, and if they are the same, the limit exists
 
  • #3
For part a), you would have two cases as you stated above. The (x-2) term on the top and bottom should "cancel" each other out leaving you with an exact value. You must check if the limit approaching from the right matches the limit approaching from the left to see if the limit exists. You're on the right track.

Now for part b), you are almost there. You managed to rationalize the denominator but there is still work to be done with the numerator. No expansion is required. Think about what else can be done! The (sqrt(4-x) - 2) term is giving you a problem right ( 0/0 )?
 
  • #5
theneedtoknow said:
1st question :
you are right to split the limit into 2 cases
it's easier if in the second case you factor out the -1from the brackets and keep the factors the same as in the first case (x-2)
What you are forgetting to do is cancel the factors from the numerator and the denominator...once you cancel an (x-2) , the limits are no longer undefined... so cancel it in both cases, and compare the 2 answers, and if they are the same, the limit exists

Are we allowed to cancel out?


We haven't studied L'Hôpital's rule but I don't know what to do with that one..
 
  • #6
btw, did i use the correct expression in a, in the numerator, when x approaching 2 from the negative side?

[tex]lim_{x\rightarrow2}\frac{\left|x^2 + x -6\right|}{x-2}[/tex]
...

(x approaching 2 from the negative side)

[tex]lim_{x\rightarrow2-}\frac{(-x+2)(x+3)}{x-2}[/tex]
 
  • #7
powerless said:
3. The Attempt at a Solution

a)we have an absolute value on the numerator but we can factorise it:
[tex]lim_{x\rightarrow2}\frac{\left|x^2 + x -6\right|}{x-2}[/tex]
[tex]lim_{x\rightarrow2}\frac{(x-2)(x+3)}{x-2}[/tex]

Now we have two cases:

(x approaching 2 from the positive side)
[tex]lim_{x\rightarrow2+}\frac{(x-2)(x+3)}{x-2}[/tex]

[tex]lim_{x\rightarrow2+}\frac{(2-2)(2+3)}{2-2}[/tex] = undefined (?)

(x approaching 2 from the negative side)
[tex]lim_{x\rightarrow2-}\frac{(-x+2)(x+3)}{x-2}[/tex]

[tex]lim_{x\rightarrow2-}\frac{(-2+2)(2+3)}{2-2}[/tex] = undefined

Why do I always get devision by zero and undefined, did I do somethin wrong?
[/b]

No, you're right. You're able to cancel. If the numerator and denominator has two common terms (in this case, (x-2)), it is legitimate to cancel out.

Case 1.) Positive Limit (lim x->2+)

[tex]lim_{x\rightarrow2+}\frac{(x-2)(x+3)}{x-2}[/tex]

Since (x-2) is a common factor... you can cancel it out. Remember, this makes a 1:

[tex]lim_{x\rightarrow2+}\frac{(1)(x+3)}{1}[/tex]

Substitute x = 2 into the above case, and this is your right hand limit.

Case 2.)

[tex]lim_{x\rightarrow2-}\frac{(-x+2)(x+3)}{x-2}[/tex]

I'm not holding your hand on this one. Do the same thing but hint: factor out a -1 to have a common term.
 
  • #8
One "limit rule" that doesn't get as much notice as it deserves is this:

"If g(x)= f(x) for all x except x= a, then [itex]\lim_{x\rightarrow a} f(x)= \lim_{\rightarrow a} g(x)[/itex]."

In this particular case,
[tex]\frac{x^2+ x- 6}{x-2}= \frac{(x-2)(x+3)}{x-2}[/tex]
and
[tex]\frac{(x-2)(x+3)}{x-2}= x+3[/tex]
as long as x is not equal to 2. Therefore, they have the same limit. Yes, in a limit situation such as this you can "cancel" the 0s.

As for
[tex]lim_{x\rightarrow 0}\frac{\sqrt{4-x}-2}{\sqrt{x+1}-1}[/tex]
While you can use L'Hopital's rule, often that is "over kill". With a problem like this you should think first of "rationalizing" both the numerator and the denominator: Multiply both numerator and denominator by [itex](\sqrt{x+1}+ 1)(\sqrt{4-x}+2)[/itex]:
[tex]\frac{\sqrt{4- x}- 2}{\sqrt{x+1}-1}= \frac{(\sqrt{4-x}-2)(\sqrt{4-x}+2)(\sqrt{x+1}+1)}{(\sqrt{x+1}-1)(\sqrt{x+1}+1)(\sqrt{4- x}+ 2)}[/tex]
[tex]= \frac{(4-x-4)(\sqrt{x+1}+1)}{\sqrt{4-x}+ 2)(x+ 1- 1)}= \frac{x(\sqrt{x+1}+1)}{x(\sqrt{4-x}+ 2)}= \frac{\sqrt{x+1}+1}{\sqrt{4-x}+ 2}[/tex]
Now, what is the limit of that as x goes to 0?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #9
powerless said:
b) [tex]lim_{x\rightarrow0}\frac{\sqrt{4-x}-2}{\sqrt{x+1}-1}[/tex]

Because we have a sqrt on the denominator we mulitply top & bottom by the conjugate and we rationalize the denominator,

[tex]lim_{x\rightarrow0}\frac{(\sqrt{4-x}-2)(\sqrt{x+1}+1)}{(\sqrt{x+1}-1)\sqrt{x+1}+1)}[/tex]

The denominator expands and simplifies to:

[tex]lim_{x\rightarrow0}\frac{(\sqrt{4-x}-2)(\sqrt{x+1}+1)}{x+1-1}[/tex]

What can i do next? should I expand the numerator too? ( it would become
[tex]\sqrt{4-x.x+1}+\sqrt{4-x}-2\sqrt{x+1}-2[/tex])
But I don't know how to do this one.

[/b]

Leave it as:

[tex]lim_{x\rightarrow0}\frac{(\sqrt{4-x}-2)(\sqrt{x+1}+1)}{x+1-1}[/tex]

But simply it so the denominator is just x.


So we still can't substitute, because it will still yield an indeterminate form (0 / 0). I worked it out a few minutes ago, and you can solve this WITHOUT L'Hopital's Rule (Anyway...assuming this is Calc 1... you haven't even learned Derivatives yet).

The fundamental problem in most hard limit problems is: "How can I remove that pesky x so we're not dividing by zero?"

Here's a hint: ( sqrt{4-x}-2 ) * ( sqrt{4-x} + 2 ) = 4 - x - 4 = -x . That looks real delicious.
Multiply by the conjugate... again. This time with the numerator. Tell me what you get. (The answer is not zero FYI)
 
  • #10
I once taught a "Calculus for Economics and Business Administration Majors" course that use an awful book!

On one page they listed the laws of limits:
If lim f= A and lim g= B then lim f+ g= A+ B.
If lim f= A and lim g= B then lim fg= AB
If lim f= A and lim g= B and [itex]B\ne 0[/itex], then lim f/g= A/B.

On the very next page they introduced the integral- completely ignoring the fact that in that very important case, those laws don't apply! The derivative is the limit of the fraction f(x+h)- f(x)/h as h goes to 0 and so the "B" above must be 0. What was missing was precisely the rule I mention above.
 
  • #11
HallsofIvy said:
One "limit rule" that doesn't get as much notice as it deserves is this:

"If g(x)= f(x) for all x except x= a, then [itex]\lim_{x\rightarrow a} f(x)= \lim\rightarrow a} g(x)[/itex]."

In this particular case,
[tex]\frac{x^2+ x- 6}{x-2}= \frac{(x-2)(x+3)}{x-2}[/tex]
and
[tex]\frac{(x-2)(x+3)}{x-2}= x+3[/tex]
as long as x is not equal to 2. Therefore, they have the same limit. Yes, in a limit situation such as this you can "cancel" the 0s.

As for
[tex]lim_{x\rightarrow 0}\frac{\sqrt{4-x}-2}{\sqrt{x+1}-1}[/tex]
While you can use L'Hopital's rule, often that is "over kill". With a problem like this you should think first of "rationalizing" both the numerator and the denominator: Multiply both numerator and denominator by [itex](\sqrt{x+1}+ 1)(\sqrt{4-x}+2)[/itex]:
[tex]\frac{\sqrt{4- x}- 2}{\sqrt{x+1}-1}= \frac{(\sqrt{4-x}-2)(\sqrt{4-x}+2)(\sqrt{x+1}+1)}{(\sqrt{x+1}-1)(\sqrt{x+1}+1)(\sqrt{4- x}+ 2)}[/tex]
[tex]= \frac{(4-x-4)(\sqrt{x+1}+1)}{\sqrt{4-x}+ 2)(x+ 1- 1)}= \frac{x(\sqrt{x+1}+1)}{x(\sqrt{4-x}+ 2)}= \frac{\sqrt{x+1}+1}{\sqrt{4-x}+ 2}[/tex]
Now, what is the limit of that as x goes to 0?


HallsOfIvy,

I do not quite understand this limit rule (something that I haven't turned upon on my studies). Is there an external source where I can study this?

Also, in your explanation for Question #1...are you saying that the limits are the same?

Carlo
 
Last edited:
  • #12
HallsofIvy said:
As for
[tex]lim_{x\rightarrow 0}\frac{\sqrt{4-x}-2}{\sqrt{x+1}-1}[/tex]
While you can use L'Hopital's rule, often that is "over kill". With a problem like this you should think first of "rationalizing" both the numerator and the denominator: Multiply both numerator and denominator by [itex](\sqrt{x+1}+ 1)(\sqrt{4-x}+2)[/itex]:
[tex]\frac{\sqrt{4- x}- 2}{\sqrt{x+1}-1}= \frac{(\sqrt{4-x}-2)(\sqrt{4-x}+2)(\sqrt{x+1}+1)}{(\sqrt{x+1}-1)(\sqrt{x+1}+1)(\sqrt{4- x}+ 2)}[/tex]
[tex]= \frac{(4-x-4)(\sqrt{x+1}+1)}{\sqrt{4-x}+ 2)(x+ 1- 1)}= \frac{x(\sqrt{x+1}+1)}{x(\sqrt{4-x}+ 2)}= \frac{\sqrt{x+1}+1}{\sqrt{4-x}+ 2}[/tex]
Now, what is the limit of that as x goes to 0?

The limit is 1. Am I right?
 
  • #13
powerless said:
The limit is 1. Am I right?

Uh, check your arithmetic.
 
  • #14
HallsofIvy said:
As for
[tex]lim_{x\rightarrow 0}\frac{\sqrt{4-x}-2}{\sqrt{x+1}-1}[/tex]
While you can use L'Hopital's rule, often that is "over kill". With a problem like this you should think first of "rationalizing" both the numerator and the denominator: Multiply both numerator and denominator by [itex](\sqrt{x+1}+ 1)(\sqrt{4-x}+2)[/itex]:
[tex]\frac{\sqrt{4- x}- 2}{\sqrt{x+1}-1}= \frac{(\sqrt{4-x}-2)(\sqrt{4-x}+2)(\sqrt{x+1}+1)}{(\sqrt{x+1}-1)(\sqrt{x+1}+1)(\sqrt{4- x}+ 2)}[/tex]
[tex]= \frac{(4-x-4)(\sqrt{x+1}+1)}{\sqrt{4-x}+ 2)(x+ 1- 1)}= \frac{x(\sqrt{x+1}+1)}{x(\sqrt{4-x}+ 2)}= \frac{\sqrt{x+1}+1}{\sqrt{4-x}+ 2}[/tex]
Now, what is the limit of that as x goes to 0?


By the way: the end product should be -(sqrt(x+1) + 1) / (sqrt(4-x) + 2).

The negative sign of x was forgotten when the numerator was 4 - x - 4.

Carlo
 
  • #15
carlodelmundo said:
HallsOfIvy,

I do not quite understand this limit rule (something that I haven't turned upon on my studies). Is there an external source where I can study this?

Also, in your explanation for Question #1...are you saying that the limits are the same?

Carlo
Do you mean:
HallsofIvy said:
One "limit rule" that doesn't get as much notice as it deserves is this:
"If g(x)= f(x) for all x except x= a, then [itex]\lim_{x\rightarrow a} f(x)= \lim\rightarrow a} g(x)[/itex]."

You should have learned that along with the definition of limit- but, as I said, students often don't notice it.

The Definition of "limit" is this:
"The [itex]\lim_{x\rightarrow a} f(x)= L[/itex]" means that, given any [itex]\epsilon> 0[/itex], there exist [itex]\delta> 0[/itex] such that if [itex]0< |x- a|< \delta[/itex] then [itex]|f(x)- L|< \epsilon[/itex].

Notice that "0< |x-a|"? What happens at x= a is irrelevant to the limit! That means that we can change the value of the function in any way we want at x= a and not change the limit there.

Here's a cute problem: Define f(x) by
f(x)= 1000 if x< -0.001
f(x)= 3x2+ 6x if [itex]-0.001\le x< 0
f(x)= 1000 if x= 0
f(x)= sin(x) if [itex]0< x\le 0.001
f(x)= 1000 if x> 0.001

What is [itex]\lim_{x\rightarrrow 0} f(x)[/itex]?
 
  • #16
HallsOfIvy,

Yes, I've learned the formal definition of a limit (Epsilon-Delta), and I understand that even though there might be discontinuities at x = a (as the limit of x approaches a), there is no bearing on the actual limit. (that is... the limit as x approaches a still exists even if there is still a point discontinuity).

1.) The "one limit rule that students mostly overlook," as you've stated, is kind of a blur. Perhaps the latex was mistyped on the last part of the section? Please correct me if I translate it wrong into English... but this is my interpretation of "the rule:"

If g(x) = f(x) for all x except x = a, then the limit as x approaches a of f(x) is equal to the limit * a(g(x)).

Perhaps the latter half of the sentence means, "the limit of x approaches to a is equivalent to g(x). If this is so, then this rule isn't a problem anymore--I just misread it.

One last thing--what bearing does the Epsilon-Delta rule have on this problem (Problem #1), when #1's answer is: The Limit DNE?

Carlo
 
  • #17
I hadn't noticed that I had the LaTex wrong. It should have been
[itex]\lim_{x\rightarrow a} f(x)= \lim_{\rightarrow a} g(x)[/itex]


By "#1" do you mean "a":
[tex]\lim_{x\rightarrow2}\frac{\left|x^2 + x -6\right|}{x-2}[/tex]

It has already been shown that, as x goes to 2 from above, the "one-sided" limit is (2+ 3)= 5 and, as x goes to 2 from below, the "one-sided" limit is -(2+ 3)= -5 so the limit itself does not exist.

What does that have to do with "epsilon-delta"? That shows that for any [itex]\delta> 0[/itex] we can find x closer to 2 than that ([itex]|x- 2|< \delta[/itex]) with x> 2 arbitrarily close to 5 and with x< 2, arbitrarily close to -5. If we were to claim that the limit is any number, L, then we would have to have [itex]|f(x)- L|= |5- L|< \epsilon[/itex] and [itex]|f(x)- L|= |-5-L|= |5+L|< \epsilon[/itex] for values of x within the same [itex]\delta[/itex] of 2. It should be clear that those can't both be true for any [itex]\epsilon< 5[/itex].
 
  • #18
Thank you! That cleared up some of my thoughts.
 

1. What is the purpose of solving hard limits?

Solving hard limits is important in mathematics and physics because it allows us to determine the behavior of a function as it approaches a certain value or point. This information is essential in understanding the properties and characteristics of a function, and is often used in solving complex equations and problems.

2. How do you find the limits of a function?

To find the limit of a function, you can use algebraic techniques such as factoring, simplifying, and substitution. You can also use graphical methods, such as plotting points and observing the trend of the function as it approaches a specific value. Additionally, calculus techniques such as derivatives and integrals can also be used to find limits.

3. What are some common reasons for a limit not existing?

A limit may not exist for several reasons, including a vertical asymptote, a discontinuity, or an infinite oscillation. These situations occur when the function approaches different values from the left and right sides, or when the function becomes undefined at a certain point.

4. Can limits be solved for any type of function?

Limits can be solved for most types of functions, including polynomial, rational, exponential, logarithmic, and trigonometric functions. However, there are some functions, such as oscillating or discontinuous functions, that may not have a well-defined limit.

5. How can finding limits be useful in real-world applications?

Finding limits is essential in many real-world applications, such as determining the maximum or minimum value of a function, calculating rates of change, and predicting the behavior of a system. It is also used in fields such as engineering, economics, and physics to model and analyze real-world phenomena.

Similar threads

  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
8
Views
661
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
17
Views
611
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
3
Views
952
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
10
Views
826
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
4
Views
964
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
8
Views
801
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
12
Views
1K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
16
Views
1K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
847
Back
Top