If a divides bc, then a divides b or a divides c

  • Thread starter Dustinsfl
  • Start date
In summary, the statement "If a|bc, then a|b or a|c" is false because it does not hold true for all cases. A counterexample is given where a = 4, b = 6, and c = 10. The proof provided is also incorrect as it divides by b without considering the possibility of b being 0, and it assumes that m/b will always be an integer. It is advised to refrain from dividing in proofs unless it is certain that the denominator is not 0 and the quotient is an integer.
  • #1
Dustinsfl
2,281
5
If [tex]a|bc[/tex], then [tex]a|b[/tex] or [tex]a|c[/tex].

[tex]a|bc\Leftrightarrow am=bc\Leftrightarrow a\left(\frac{m}{b}\right)=c[/tex]

Hence, [tex]a|c[/tex]
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Dustinsfl said:
If [tex]a|bc[/tex], then [tex]a|b[/tex] or [tex]a|c[/tex].

[tex]a|bc\Leftrightarrow am=bc\Leftrightarrow a\left(\frac{m}{b}\right)=c[/tex]

Hence, [tex]a|c[/tex]

That statement is false as stated. Let b = 6, c = 10. Then a = 4 divides bc = 60 but a doesn't divide either b or c.
 
  • #3
Your proof is false because you are dividing by b. This is incorrect since b could be 0.
 
Last edited:
  • #4
ocohen said:
This is only true if b or c is prime. As a side note, your proof is false because you are dividing by b. This is incorrect since b could be 0.

he also doesn't know whether m/b will be an integer or not.

I am guessing you are reading an introductory number theory book. you should refrain from dividing as much as possible in your proofs. modding out is acceptable later when you start doing it, but don't divide unless you know that the denominator is NOT zero and the quotient is an integer.
 

1. How is the statement "If a divides bc, then a divides b or a divides c" written in mathematical notation?

The statement can be written as a | bc ➝ a | b or a | c, where the vertical bar represents "divides" and the arrow represents "implies".

2. What does it mean for a number to divide another number?

When a number, let's say x, divides another number y, it means that y can be evenly divided by x with no remainder. In other words, y is a multiple of x.

3. How does this statement relate to the concept of prime numbers?

This statement is related to the concept of prime numbers because it helps us identify whether a number is prime or not. If a number a divides a product bc, then either a must be a factor of b or a must be a factor of c. Therefore, if a number is not a factor of either b or c, then it cannot divide their product, making it a prime number.

4. Can you provide an example to illustrate this statement?

Sure, let's say a = 2, b = 4, and c = 6. We know that 2 divides 4 (2 | 4) and also 2 divides 6 (2 | 6). Therefore, if 2 divides their product (4 * 6 = 24), it must also divide either 4 or 6. In this case, it divides both 4 and 6, making the statement true.

5. What is the significance of this statement in mathematics?

This statement is significant in mathematics because it helps us prove other theorems and make deductions in number theory. It also helps us identify properties of numbers, such as prime numbers and factors. Understanding this statement can also aid in solving mathematical problems and equations more efficiently.

Similar threads

  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
4
Views
989
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
386
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
966
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
575
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
6
Views
558
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
773
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
571
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • Precalculus Mathematics Homework Help
Replies
5
Views
1K
Back
Top