Is there a way to replace nuclear power with a (big) hydrogen fuel cell

In summary: Yes. The fuel cells were used during the Apollo series missions because the batteries were not yet perfected. Yes. The fuel cells were used during the Apollo series missions because the batteries were not yet perfected.
  • #1
baywax
Gold Member
2,176
1
Could one really big hydrogen fuel cell battery replace a nuclear reactor in providing power to millions of people? This may end up being a safer option for generating power.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
  • #2
baywax said:
Could one really big hydrogen fuel cell battery replace a nuclear reactor in providing power to millions of people? This may end up being a safer option for generating power.

Sure.

But what are you going to use to produce the Hydrogen? Electrolysis on seawater? And the energy for that comes from... ?
 
  • #3
No. Coincidentally someone answered a related thread with the perfect explanation. Hydrogen is not naturally occurring, you need to use energy to produce hydrogen. Hydrogen is only useful as a storage medium. You create hydrogen and can use it in hydrogen powered automobiles for example. However, it's a net loss, you need energy to create it and then you use it, with less than 100% efficiency, for something else such as powering a car. It's not a fuel source such as naturally occurring oil, sunlight, wind power etc.
 
  • #4
That sounds vaguely familiar... :tongue:
 
  • #5
russ_watters said:
That sounds vaguely familiar... :tongue:

I think you copied me in another thread...
 
  • #6
Pengwuino said:
No. Coincidentally someone answered a related thread with the perfect explanation. Hydrogen is not naturally occurring, you need to use energy to produce hydrogen. Hydrogen is only useful as a storage medium. You create hydrogen and can use it in hydrogen powered automobiles for example. However, it's a net loss, you need energy to create it and then you use it, with less than 100% efficiency, for something else such as powering a car. It's not a fuel source such as naturally occurring oil, sunlight, wind power etc.

So using solar power to produce the hydrogen would be redundant... when you could simply generate the power with the solar power?
 
  • #7
baywax said:
So using solar power to produce the hydrogen would be redundant... when you could simply generate the power with the solar power?

No. There are many prospective methods of producing hydrogen with sunlight that are much more efficient and cheaper than just using solar panels. Thermochemical and photochemical cycles can reach efficiencies more than double that of similar priced solar cells and using SOFCs (~70% efficient) to generate electricity.

You can also generate hydrogen via high temperature electrolysis in a nuclear reactor and use fuel cells generate power more efficiently than you can with a typical rankin cycle design.
 
  • #8
Using solar power to produce hydrogen also allows you to store the solar energy.
 
  • #9
RandomGuy88 said:
Using solar power to produce hydrogen also allows you to store the solar energy.

Solar power isn't particularly efficient as it is (30% at best?).

Allowing for energy loss during the process of extracting the Hydrogen, you get a very inefficient system.

Other renewable sources may be better suited.
 
  • #10
Topher925 said:
No. There are many prospective methods of producing hydrogen with sunlight that are much more efficient and cheaper than just using solar panels. Thermochemical and photochemical cycles can reach efficiencies more than double that of similar priced solar cells and using SOFCs (~70% efficient) to generate electricity.

You can also generate hydrogen via high temperature electrolysis in a nuclear reactor and use fuel cells generate power more efficiently than you can with a typical rankin cycle design.

Ok. Very good to hear that. Kind of a play on photosynthesis or a metabolic system that produces hydrogen.

Also a good comment about how using solar energy to produce hydrogen is a form of storing solar energy for later use.

How big and how efficient would a hydrogen fuel cell... or fuel cell of any kind... have to be to power millions of people's needs? Or would it be profitable and safer etc... to include the individual fuel cells with each residence or apartment etc...?

Also, since fuel cell batteries were used during the Apollo series missions ( around 1969), haven't they been perfected to a point of being able to power helicopters and so on?
 

1. Can hydrogen fuel cells completely replace nuclear power?

No, hydrogen fuel cells cannot completely replace nuclear power. While hydrogen fuel cells can generate electricity, they are not capable of producing the same level of energy as nuclear power plants. Additionally, nuclear power plants can operate continuously, while hydrogen fuel cells require refueling.

2. How does the energy efficiency of hydrogen fuel cells compare to nuclear power?

The energy efficiency of hydrogen fuel cells is lower than nuclear power. Nuclear power plants have an efficiency rate of around 33%, while hydrogen fuel cells have an efficiency rate of around 60%. This means that nuclear power plants can generate more electricity with the same amount of fuel compared to hydrogen fuel cells.

3. Are there any safety concerns with using hydrogen fuel cells as a replacement for nuclear power?

Yes, there are safety concerns with using hydrogen fuel cells as a replacement for nuclear power. Hydrogen fuel cells require the use of highly flammable hydrogen gas, which can pose a fire and explosion risk if not handled properly. In contrast, nuclear power plants have strict safety protocols in place to prevent accidents and protect the public.

4. How feasible is it to replace nuclear power with hydrogen fuel cells on a large scale?

It is not currently feasible to replace nuclear power with hydrogen fuel cells on a large scale. While hydrogen fuel cells have been used in smaller applications, such as powering vehicles, the technology is not yet developed enough to handle the energy demands of a large-scale power grid. Additionally, the infrastructure for producing and distributing hydrogen fuel is still limited.

5. What are the potential environmental impacts of using hydrogen fuel cells instead of nuclear power?

The use of hydrogen fuel cells instead of nuclear power could have both positive and negative environmental impacts. On one hand, hydrogen fuel cells produce no emissions and use a clean energy source. On the other hand, the production of hydrogen fuel itself can contribute to pollution and greenhouse gas emissions. Additionally, the disposal of used fuel cells can also have environmental consequences.

Similar threads

  • General Engineering
3
Replies
96
Views
10K
  • Nuclear Engineering
2
Replies
45
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • Nuclear Engineering
Replies
0
Views
564
  • General Engineering
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • Nuclear Engineering
6
Replies
191
Views
5K
Replies
26
Views
965
  • Mechanical Engineering
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
17
Views
2K
Replies
47
Views
9K
Back
Top