Using double integrals to evaluate single integrals

  • Thread starter autodidude
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Integrals
In summary, In most calculus textbooks, they use double integrals to evaluate the Gaussian integral. Double integrals allow for a simpler evaluation of the integral.
  • #1
autodidude
333
0
In most calculus textbooks, they use double integrals to evaluate the Gaussian integral. Where did they get the idea - or how did they choose the two variable function [tex]e^{-(x^2+y^x)}[/tex] to evaluate it?

I guess this is related...but if you were given a fairly hairy integral and it was suggested that you write the integrand as an integral, how would you go about doing so? The example I have in mind is [tex]\int^2_0 arctan(\pi x)-arctan(x) dx[/tex]. The only way I know how to do that is by integration by parts
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Where did they get the idea
Intuition, or just brute force: Test options until one of them is successful.

and it was suggested that you write the integrand as an integral, how would you go about doing so?
arctan has a nice representation as integral.
 
  • #3
If you have [itex]\int_a^b F(x)dx[/itex] and F'(x)= f(x) then, by the fundamental theorem of Calculus,[itex]F(x)= \int_p^x f(y)dy[/tex] for some p so [itex]\int_a^b F(x)dx= \int_a^b\int_p^x f(y)dydx[/itex]
 
  • #4
HallsofIvy said:
If you have [itex]\int_a^b F(x)dx[/itex] and F'(x)= f(x) then, by the fundamental theorem of Calculus,[itex]F(x)= \int_p^x f(y)dy[/tex] for some p so [itex]\int_a^b F(x)dx= \int_a^b\int_p^x f(y)dydx[/itex]

This wouldn't be known as 'integration under the integral sign' would it? I just came across the technique in Woods' 'Advanced Calculus' and it looks similar.

I tried it on the integral I posted and I've probably misunderstood something, but it doesn't seem to simplify it at all (still have to use integration by parts). And secondly, how do you choose the lower bound p?

What I got was:

[tex]\int_0^{\pi} \int_0^2 arctan(\alpha x)-arctan(x)dxd\alpha[/tex]

I ended up choosing 0 as a lower bound cause that's when the integrand is 0...hmmm...I think I've got down the wrong track here
 
  • #5
autodidude said:
In most calculus textbooks, they use double integrals to evaluate the Gaussian integral. Where did they get the idea - or how did they choose the two variable function [tex]e^{-(x^2+y^x)}[/tex] to evaluate it?

I guess this is related...but if you were given a fairly hairy integral and it was suggested that you write the integrand as an integral, how would you go about doing so? The example I have in mind is [tex]\int^2_0 arctan(\pi x)-arctan(x) dx[/tex]. The only way I know how to do that is by integration by parts

I presume you realize you have a typo. The exponent is x2+y2. The integration is easily carried out by converting to polar coordinates. The exponent is now r2, the differential is rdrdθ, and the limits are [0,∞) and [0,2π). As you can see the integration is straightforward.

Your other example seems to be completely unrelated.
 
  • #6
autodidude said:
This wouldn't be known as 'integration under the integral sign' would it? I just came across the technique in Woods' 'Advanced Calculus' and it looks similar.

I tried it on the integral I posted and I've probably misunderstood something, but it doesn't seem to simplify it at all (still have to use integration by parts). And secondly, how do you choose the lower bound p?

What I got was:

[tex]\int_0^{\pi} \int_0^2 arctan(\alpha x)-arctan(x)dxd\alpha[/tex]

I ended up choosing 0 as a lower bound cause that's when the integrand is 0...hmmm...I think I've got down the wrong track here

You're not quite going in the right direction. You want to start with

$$\int_0^2 dx~(\mbox{arctan}(\pi x) - \mbox{arctan}(x) ) = \int_0^2 dx~\left. \mbox{arctan}(yx)\right|^{y=\pi}_{y=1}.$$

You want to replace the ##\left. \mbox{arctan}(yx)\right|^{y=\pi}_{y=1}## with an integral. Do you think you know what to do now?
 
  • #7
mathman said:
I presume you realize you have a typo. The exponent is x2+y2. The integration is easily carried out by converting to polar coordinates. The exponent is now r2, the differential is rdrdθ, and the limits are [0,∞) and [0,2π). As you can see the integration is straightforward.

Your other example seems to be completely unrelated.

No, I don't think his other example is unrelated at all. Why do you think it is?

There are integrals that are difficult to evaluate, but sometimes the integrand can be modified by adding another variable. Then, one can use, say, Fubini's Theorem to evaluate the original integral by switching order of integration and comparing. So, perhaps the integral he posted can be computed that way.
 
  • #8
autodidude said:
In most calculus textbooks, they use double integrals to evaluate the Gaussian integral. Where did they get the idea - or how did they choose the two variable function [tex]e^{-(x^2+y^x)}[/tex] to evaluate it?

well the single integral is just area under the curve

so if [tex]A=\int e^{-x^2}dx[/tex]

then [tex]A^2=(\int e^{-x^2}dx)(\int e^{-y^2}dy)=\iint e^{-(x^2+y^2)}dxdy[/tex]

so[tex] A= \sqrt{\iint e^{-(x^2+y^2)}dxdy}[/tex]
 
  • #9
Mute said:
You're not quite going in the right direction. You want to start with

$$\int_0^2 dx~(\mbox{arctan}(\pi x) - \mbox{arctan}(x) ) = \int_0^2 dx~\left. \mbox{arctan}(yx)\right|^{y=\pi}_{y=1}.$$

You want to replace the ##\left. \mbox{arctan}(yx)\right|^{y=\pi}_{y=1}## with an integral. Do you think you know what to do now?

Sorry for the late reply, I've been a bit occupied with coursework.

I'm not sure how you knew to replace the original integrand with arctan(yx) evaluated from y=1 to y=π
 
  • #10
autodidude said:
Sorry for the late reply, I've been a bit occupied with coursework.

I'm not sure how you knew to replace the original integrand with arctan(yx) evaluated from y=1 to y=π

Well, you want to make the single integral into a double integral, so it seems like the most straightforward way to do that would be to replace the integrand with another integral. You integrand had the form f(bx) - f(ax). This looks like the result of a definite integration:

$$ \int_a^b dy~\frac{d}{dy} f(yx)= \left.f(yx)\right|_{y=a}^{y=b} = f(bx) - f(ax).$$

I wrote it as ##\left. \mbox{arctan}(yx)\right|_{y=1}^{y=\pi}## rather than as an integral so that you could try and fill in the last step yourself.

Does this make more sense?
 

1. What is a double integral?

A double integral is a mathematical concept used to find the volume under a curved surface in two dimensions. It involves summing the areas of infinitely thin rectangles within a given region.

2. How is a double integral used to evaluate single integrals?

A double integral can be used to evaluate single integrals by integrating over one variable and treating the other as a constant. This allows us to find the area under a curve in one dimension by using the double integral to find the volume under the curve in two dimensions.

3. What is the difference between a single integral and a double integral?

A single integral is used to find the area under a curve in one dimension, while a double integral is used to find the volume under a curved surface in two dimensions. A single integral has one variable of integration, while a double integral has two variables of integration.

4. What are the applications of using double integrals to evaluate single integrals?

Double integrals are commonly used in physics and engineering to find the volume of a solid, the center of mass of an object, and the work done by a force. They are also used in economics and statistics to calculate probabilities and expected values.

5. What are some common techniques for solving double integrals?

Some common techniques for solving double integrals include using the Fubini's theorem, changing the order of integration, and using substitution or polar coordinates. It is also helpful to visualize the region of integration and break it into smaller, simpler shapes.

Similar threads

Replies
14
Views
1K
  • Calculus
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
178
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • Calculus
Replies
29
Views
511
Replies
13
Views
925
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
793
Back
Top